IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v66y2016icp435-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioenergy from Cotton Industry Wastes: A review and potential

Author

Listed:
  • Hamawand, Ihsan
  • Sandell, Gary
  • Pittaway, Pam
  • Chakrabarty, Sayan
  • Yusaf, Talal
  • Chen, Guangnan
  • Seneweera, Saman
  • Al-Lwayzy, Saddam
  • Bennett, John
  • Hopf, Joshua

Abstract

Current estimates for world cotton production are about 25 million tonnes and accounting for 50 million tons of biomass waste. The options for utilising cotton biomass wastes include composting, gasification, pyrolysis, fermentation (ethanol), anaerobic digestion and direct incineration. Solid cotton gin waste cannot be directly reused on-farm due to farm hygiene risks. Composting either on-farm or at the gin is an accepted method for pathogen disinfection and pesticide degradation, although this option may face the problem of small market demand and possible disease concerns. On the other hand, on-farm cotton residues are fundamental for minimising losses in soil carbon, organic carbon content and surface protection. Converting these wastes to energy using various treatments such as gasification, pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion minimises the land required for processing, and the energy produced may offset the much higher capital costs involved. The scope of this study is to examine the size of cotton industry in Australia and the associated by-products produced. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of different options for utilising cotton wastes throughout processing were examined. The technical, environmental and economic aspects of each waste management option have formed the basis of our conclusions and recommendations. It seems that pyrolysis of cotton stalks is a good option due to the potential revenue of $104 million dollars. Using cotton gin trash (CGT) for ethanol production is another option, and the average production would be around 33–47 million litres of ethanol for the entire industry. The revenue from this process can be $33–47 million ($1/L). Cotton stalk provides the highest burning efficiency and longest burn time compared to corn stover and soybean residues. The potential amount of energy produced from burning cotton stalks can be around 24.8PJ which is equivalent to $97 million worth of coal.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamawand, Ihsan & Sandell, Gary & Pittaway, Pam & Chakrabarty, Sayan & Yusaf, Talal & Chen, Guangnan & Seneweera, Saman & Al-Lwayzy, Saddam & Bennett, John & Hopf, Joshua, 2016. "Bioenergy from Cotton Industry Wastes: A review and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:66:y:2016:i:c:p:435-448
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116304646
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Zhi-Ao & Jin, Bao-Sheng & Zhang, Ming-Yao & Liu, Ren-Ping & Zhang, Yong, 2008. "Experimental study on cotton stalk combustion in a circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(11), pages 1027-1040, November.
    2. Chakrabarty, Sayan & Boksh, F.I.M. Muktadir & Chakraborty, Arpita, 2013. "Economic viability of biogas and green self-employment opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 757-766.
    3. D. J. Gielen & J. Fujino & S. Hashimoto & Y. Moriguchi, 2002. "Biomass strategies for climate policies?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 319-333, December.
    4. Isci, A. & Demirer, G.N., 2007. "Biogas production potential from cotton wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 750-757.
    5. Liu, Xiaolan & Farmer, Michael, 2010. "Economic Aspects of Renewable Energy from Agricultural Waste on the Southern Plains of Texas," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61752, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Hamawand, Ihsan, 2015. "Anaerobic digestion process and bio-energy in meat industry: A review and a potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-51.
    7. Julia C. Terrapon-Pfaff, 2012. "Linking Energy- and Land-Use Systems: Energy Potentials and Environmental Risks of Using Agricultural Residues in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Widjaya, Elita R. & Chen, Guangnan & Bowtell, Les & Hills, Catherine, 2018. "Gasification of non-woody biomass: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 184-193.
    2. Qurat-ul-Ain & Aisha Nazir & Sergio C. Capareda & Muhammad Shafiq & Firdaus-e-Bareen, 2021. "Valorization of Cotton Gin Trash through Thermal and Biological Conversion for Soil Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Manoj Kandasamy & Ihsan Hamawand & Leslie Bowtell & Saman Seneweera & Sayan Chakrabarty & Talal Yusaf & Zaidoon Shakoor & Sattar Algayyim & Friederike Eberhard, 2017. "Investigation of Ethanol Production Potential from Lignocellulosic Material without Enzymatic Hydrolysis Using the Ultrasound Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Ihsan Hamawand & Wilton da Silva & Saman Seneweera & Jochen Bundschuh, 2021. "Value Proposition of Different Methods for Utilisation of Sugarcane Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Hosseini, Seyyed Hasan & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Biofuel production from citrus wastes: A feasibility study in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1100-1112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuprianov, Vladimir I. & Kaewklum, Rachadaporn & Chakritthakul, Songpol, 2011. "Effects of operating conditions and fuel properties on emission performance and combustion efficiency of a swirling fluidized-bed combustor fired with a biomass fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2038-2048.
    2. Youssef, Mahmoud A. & Wahid, Seddik S. & Mohamed, Maher A. & Askalany, Ahmed A., 2009. "Experimental study on Egyptian biomass combustion in circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(12), pages 2644-2650, December.
    3. Ihsan Hamawand & Anas Ghadouani & Jochen Bundschuh & Sara Hamawand & Raed A. Al Juboori & Sayan Chakrabarty & Talal Yusaf, 2017. "A Critical Review on Processes and Energy Profile of the Australian Meat Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Islam, Md Tasbirul & Karim, Mohd Aminul & Karim, Nissar Mohammad, 2014. "Exploitation of renewable energy for sustainable development and overcoming power crisis in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 223-235.
    5. Chandni Singh & James Ford & Debora Ley & Amir Bazaz & Aromar Revi, 2020. "Assessing the feasibility of adaptation options: methodological advancements and directions for climate adaptation research and practice," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 255-277, September.
    6. Povellato, Andrea & Bosello, Francesco & Giupponi, Carlo, 2007. "A Review of Recent Studies on Cost Effectiveness of GHG Mitigation Measures in the European Agro-Forestry Sector," Natural Resources Management Working Papers 10268, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    7. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.
    8. Duan, Lunbo & Liu, Daoyin & Chen, Xiaoping & Zhao, Changsui, 2012. "Fly ash recirculation by bottom feeding on a circulating fluidized bed boiler co-burning coal sludge and coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 295-299.
    9. Meneses-Jácome, Alexander & Diaz-Chavez, Rocío & Velásquez-Arredondo, Héctor I. & Cárdenas-Chávez, Diana L. & Parra, Roberto & Ruiz-Colorado, Angela A., 2016. "Sustainable Energy from agro-industrial wastewaters in Latin-America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1249-1262.
    10. Åhman, Max, 2010. "Biomethane in the transport sector--An appraisal of the forgotten option," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 208-217, January.
    11. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Zahida Aslam & Hu Li & James Hammerton & Gordon Andrews & Andrew Ross & Jon C. Lovett, 2021. "Increasing Access to Electricity: An Assessment of the Energy and Power Generation Potential from Biomass Waste Residues in Tanzania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Paulo Rotela Junior & Eugenio Fischetti & Victor G. Araújo & Rogério S. Peruchi & Giancarlo Aquila & Luiz Célio S. Rocha & Liviam S. Lacerda, 2019. "Wind Power Economic Feasibility under Uncertainty and the Application of ANN in Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-10, June.
    14. Yasar, Abdullah & Nazir, Saba & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Nazar, Masooma & Rasheed, Rizwan & Afzaal, Muhammad, 2017. "Socio-economic, health and agriculture benefits of rural household biogas plants in energy scarce developing countries: A case study from Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 19-25.
    15. Luz, Sandra M. & Caldeira-Pires, Armando & Ferrão, Paulo M.C., 2010. "Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: Ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1135-1144.
    16. Suberu, Mohammed Yekini & Bashir, Nouruddeen & Mustafa, Mohd. Wazir, 2013. "Biogenic waste methane emissions and methane optimization for bioelectricity in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 643-654.
    17. Sandberg, Jan & Karlsson, Christer & Fdhila, Rebei Bel, 2011. "A 7Â year long measurement period investigating the correlation of corrosion, deposit and fuel in a biomass fired circulated fluidized bed boiler," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 99-110, January.
    18. Khan, Ershad Ullah & Martin, Andrew R., 2015. "Optimization of hybrid renewable energy polygeneration system with membrane distillation for rural households in Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1116-1127.
    19. Duan, Feng & Liu, Jian & Chyang, Chien-Song & Hu, Chun-Hsuan & Tso, Jim, 2013. "Combustion behavior and pollutant emission characteristics of RDF (refuse derived fuel) and sawdust in a vortexing fluidized bed combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 421-426.
    20. Amjid, Syed S. & Bilal, Muhammad Q. & Nazir, Muhammad S. & Hussain, Altaf, 2011. "Biogas, renewable energy resource for Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2833-2837, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:66:y:2016:i:c:p:435-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.