IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v216y2025ics1364032125003119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Upcycling anaerobic digestion streams into feed-grade protein for increased environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Marami, Hadis
  • Khademi, Sahar
  • Rafiee, Shahin
  • Mobli, Hossein
  • Birkved, Morten
  • Li, He
  • Angelidaki, Irini
  • Khoshnevisan, Benyamin

Abstract

Biogas plants have long been recognized as well-established systems for converting waste into energy and organic fertilizers. However, biogas plants are expected to go beyond their primary functions to enhance the sustainability gains from the circular bioeconomy. Carbon (CO2 and CH4) and nitrogen streams from anaerobic digestion (AD) facilities can be converted into higher-value products, such as microbial proteins (MPs). While two dominant pathways are known for MP production from AD streams, namely methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) and hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria (HOB), there is a lack of comprehensive research comparing these two pathways from an environmental sustainability viewpoint. Furthermore, the extent to which the environmental sustainability of MP production platforms depends on feedstock characteristics is yet to be scrutinized. To address the above-mentioned research questions, four biogas plants treating different types of biowaste were selected as case studies. Specifically, the effects of the C/N ratio in the input streams, biogas upgrading technologies (water scrubbing and biological biogas upgrading), and microbial platforms (HOB and MOB) were investigated. Environmental impacts were assessed using consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA), with Denmark as the spatial boundary and 2030 as the temporal boundary. Across all scenarios, the MOB pathway demonstrated superior environmental performance compared with the other pathways. Furthermore, the composition of the feedstock and quantity of biogas play key roles in the total environmental gains. Finally, the sources of uncertainty and opportunities for future improvements are identified to pave the way for land-independent feed-grade protein production using locally available biowastes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marami, Hadis & Khademi, Sahar & Rafiee, Shahin & Mobli, Hossein & Birkved, Morten & Li, He & Angelidaki, Irini & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin, 2025. "Upcycling anaerobic digestion streams into feed-grade protein for increased environmental sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125003119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125003119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.