IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v162y2022ics1364032122003811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of scaling laws applied to floating offshore wind turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Sergiienko, N.Y.
  • da Silva, L.S.P.
  • Bachynski-Polić, E.E.
  • Cazzolato, B.S.
  • Arjomandi, M.
  • Ding, B.

Abstract

The wind energy industry is moving to offshore installations allowing for larger wind turbines to be deployed in deep-water regions with higher and steadier wind speeds. Floating offshore wind turbines consist of two main subsystems: a wind turbine itself and a floating substructure that supports it and provides stability. While the wind turbine technology is mature, the floating support structures for offshore wind turbines are still evolving and have not been deployed at a commercial scale. Due to a significant increase in the size of wind turbines over the last decade, it is important to understand how to design the floating platform to support larger wind turbines, and how the dynamics of the entire system change with increasing scale. Firstly, this article provides an overview of the trends in wind energy systems for offshore applications. Secondly, a review of existing semi-submersible platforms designed to support 5–15 MW wind turbines is provided. In addition, this article provides a comparative analysis of the techniques proposed to upscale floating support structures for larger wind energy systems with a particular focus on the system dynamics. The results demonstrate that the wind turbine mass, rated power and rotor thrust force scale with close to square rotor diameter. Towers designed for floating wind applications are usually significantly stiffer and heavier as compared to their fixed-bottom counterparts to place the tower’s natural frequencies outside the wave excitation region. The analysis of semi-submersible platforms revealed a strong correlation between the wind turbine rotor diameter and the product of the distance to the offset columns and their diameter. Also, it has been found that design practices adapted by the platform developers roughly follow the theoretical square–cube (or ‘mass’) scaling law when designing platforms for larger wind turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergiienko, N.Y. & da Silva, L.S.P. & Bachynski-Polić, E.E. & Cazzolato, B.S. & Arjomandi, M. & Ding, B., 2022. "Review of scaling laws applied to floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003811
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122003811
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Wu & Moo-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Generic Upscaling Methodology of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. van de Kaa, Geerten & van Ek, Martijn & Kamp, Linda M. & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Wind turbine technology battles: Gearbox versus direct drive - opening up the black box of technology characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Yurdusev, M.A. & Ata, R. & Çetin, N.S., 2006. "Assessment of optimum tip speed ratio in wind turbines using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2153-2161.
    4. Sedaghat, Ahmad & Hassanzadeh, Arash & Jamali, Jamaloddin & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Chen, Wei-Hsin, 2017. "Determination of rated wind speed for maximum annual energy production of variable speed wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 781-789.
    5. Petrović, Vlaho & Bottasso, Carlo L., 2017. "Wind turbine envelope protection control over the full wind speed range," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 836-848.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verma, Amrit Shankar & Yan, Jiquan & Hu, Weifei & Jiang, Zhiyu & Shi, Wei & Teuwen, Julie J.E., 2023. "A review of impact loads on composite wind turbine blades: Impact threats and classification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. da Silva, L.S.P. & Sergiienko, N.Y. & Cazzolato, B. & Ding, B., 2022. "Dynamics of hybrid offshore renewable energy platforms: Heaving point absorbers connected to a semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1424-1439.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Whei-Min & Hong, Chih-Ming & Cheng, Fu-Sheng, 2010. "On-line designed hybrid controller with adaptive observer for variable-speed wind generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3022-3030.
    2. Xiao, Qing & Zhou, Shaowu, 2018. "Probabilistic power flow computation considering correlated wind speeds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 677-685.
    3. Ata, Rasit, 2015. "Artificial neural networks applications in wind energy systems: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 534-562.
    4. Imraan, Mustahib & Sharma, Rajnish N. & Flay, Richard G.J., 2013. "Wind tunnel testing of a wind turbine with telescopic blades: The influence of blade extension," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 22-32.
    5. Dali, Ali & Abdelmalek, Samir & Bakdi, Azzeddine & Bettayeb, Maamar, 2021. "A new robust control scheme: Application for MPP tracking of a PMSG-based variable-speed wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1021-1034.
    6. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.
    7. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2010. "Power optimization of wind turbines with data mining and evolutionary computation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 695-702.
    8. Lidong Zhang & Qikai Li & Yuanjun Guo & Zhile Yang & Lei Zhang, 2018. "An Investigation of Wind Direction and Speed in a Featured Wind Farm Using Joint Probability Distribution Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Kehinde A. Adeyeye & Nelson Ijumba & Jonathan S. Colton, 2021. "Multi-Parameter Optimization of Efficiency, Capital Cost and Mass of Ferris Wheel Turbine for Low Wind Speed Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Lin, Whei-Min & Hong, Chih-Ming & Cheng, Fu-Sheng, 2010. "Fuzzy neural network output maximization control for sensorless wind energy conversion system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 592-601.
    11. Kumar, Dipesh & Chatterjee, Kalyan, 2016. "A review of conventional and advanced MPPT algorithms for wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 957-970.
    12. José Luis Torres-Madroñero & Joham Alvarez-Montoya & Daniel Restrepo-Montoya & Jorge Mario Tamayo-Avendaño & César Nieto-Londoño & Julián Sierra-Pérez, 2020. "Technological and Operational Aspects That Limit Small Wind Turbines Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-39, November.
    13. Guedes, Kevin S. & de Andrade, Carla F. & Rocha, Paulo A.C. & Mangueira, Rivanilso dos S. & de Moura, Elineudo P., 2020. "Performance analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in estimating the parameters of several wind speed distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Silke van der Burg & Maarten F. M. Jurg & Flore M. Tadema & Linda M. Kamp & Geerten van de Kaa, 2022. "Dominant Designs for Wings of Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    16. Stebbings, Emily & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2021. "Accounting for benefits from natural capital: Applying a novel composite indicator framework to the marine environment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    17. Marugán, Alberto Pliego & Márquez, Fausto Pedro García & Perez, Jesus María Pinar & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego, 2018. "A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1822-1836.
    18. Edson Bortoni & Zulcy de Souza & Augusto Viana & Helcio Villa-Nova & Ângelo Rezek & Luciano Pinto & Roberto Siniscalchi & Rafael Bragança & José Bernardes, 2019. "The Benefits of Variable Speed Operation in Hydropower Plants Driven by Francis Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Cao, Li-hua & Yu, Jing-wen & Li, Yong, 2016. "Study on the determination method of the normal value of relative internal efficiency of the last stage group of steam turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 101-107.
    20. Wei-Hsin Chen & Trinh Tung Lam & Min-Hsing Chang & Liwen Jin & Chih-Che Chueh & Gerardo Lumagbas Augusto, 2024. "Optimizing H-Darrieus Wind Turbine Performance with Double-Deflector Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.