IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v154y2022ics1364032121011357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of landfill operation factors on improving biogas generation in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Ruoso, Ana Cristina
  • Dalla Nora, Macklini
  • Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse
  • Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte

Abstract

The systems for recovering energy from biogas in landfills represent a solution for solid waste treatment and the growing demand for renewable energy. However, landfill biogas recovery in Brazil is not efficient considering that the impact of the operational factors is unknown. To cope with this problem, this study presents a model to measure the impact of the various factors of landfills in the production of biogas. The study focused on improving the generation of methane. The modelling of the impact factors was supported by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was employed to build the strategic map of the cause-and-effect relationship between the factors and the biodegradation. To complement the diagnostic, the performance of biogas companies was evaluated using the Key Performance Indicators (KPI). The results showed that the operational factor that most impacted the methane generation system was the coating process (23.8%), followed by the gas drainage (23.3%) and liquid management (19.6%). On the other hand, site characteristics such as landfill extension and depth had the lowest impact, about five times smaller than that of the coating system. Meanwhile, the factors that most impacted the biodegradation were the moisture content and the fraction of organic carbon. Combined, these two factors had an impact of nearly 40% on the biodegradation process. One of the companies evaluated presented a fully satisfactory performance (80.6%), while the others achieved potentially satisfactory performance concerning the level of achievement of the operational factors. The difference among the companies’ performance was found up to 12.5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruoso, Ana Cristina & Dalla Nora, Macklini & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte, 2022. "The impact of landfill operation factors on improving biogas generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121011357
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121011357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuwahara, N. & Berni, M.D. & Bajay, S.V., 1999. "Energy supply from municipal wastes: The potential of biogas-fuelled buses in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1000-1003.
    2. Aguilar-Virgen, Quetzalli & Taboada-González, Paul & Ojeda-Benítez, Sara & Cruz-Sotelo, Samantha, 2014. "Power generation with biogas from municipal solid waste: Prediction of gas generation with in situ parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 412-419.
    3. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Đekić, Petar S. & Mijailović, Ivan & Tomić, Mladen, 2017. "Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 917-926.
    4. Rosa, Carmen B. & Wendt, João Francisco M. & Chaves, Daniel M.S. & Thomasi, Virginia & Michels, Leandro & Siluk, Julio Cezar M., 2020. "Mathematical modeling for the measurement of the competitiveness index of Brazil south urban sectors for installation of photovoltaic systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    6. Mambeli Barros, Regina & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lúcio & da Silva, Tiago Rodrigo, 2014. "The electric energy potential of landfill biogas in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 150-164.
    7. Leme, Marcio Montagnana Vicente & Rocha, Mateus Henrique & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Lopes, Bruno Marciano & Ferreira, Cláudio Homero, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 8-20.
    8. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    9. Penteado, Roger & Cavalli, Massimo & Magnano, Enrico & Chiampo, Fulvia, 2012. "Application of the IPCC model to a Brazilian landfill: First results," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 551-556.
    10. Hondo, Hiroki & Moriizumi, Yue, 2017. "Employment creation potential of renewable power generation technologies: A life cycle approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 128-136.
    11. Nixon, J.D. & Dey, P.K. & Ghosh, S.K. & Davies, P.A., 2013. "Evaluation of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India using the hierarchical analytical network process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 215-223.
    12. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 149-162.
    13. Li, Yebo & Park, Stephen Y. & Zhu, Jiying, 2011. "Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 821-826, January.
    14. Nadaletti, W.C. & Cremonez, P.A. & de Souza, S.N.M. & Bariccatti, R.A. & Belli Filho, P. & Secco, D., 2015. "Potential use of landfill biogas in urban bus fleet in the Brazilian states: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 277-283.
    15. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.
    16. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Antonio Barragán-Escandón & Jonathan Miguel Olmedo Ruiz & Jonnathan David Curillo Tigre & Esteban F. Zalamea-León, 2020. "Assessment of Power Generation Using Biogas from Landfills in an Equatorial Tropical Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Nguyen Huu Hoang & Csaba Fogarassy, 2020. "Sustainability Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management System for Hanoi (Vietnam)—Why to Choose the ‘Waste-to-Energy’ Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Natalia M. Gusmerotti & Filippo Corsini & Alessandra Borghini & Marco Frey, 2019. "Assessing the role of preparation for reuse in waste-prevention strategies by analytical hierarchical process: suggestions for an optimal implementation in waste management supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2773-2792, December.
    6. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    7. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Md Monjurul Islam & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "Land Suitability and Insurance Premiums: A GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Sustainable Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Hadi Soltanifard & Elham Jafari, 2019. "A conceptual framework to assess ecological quality of urban green space: a case study in Mashhad city, Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1781-1808, August.
    10. Angeliki Tsantili & Irene Koronaki & Vasilis Polydoros, 2023. "Maximizing Energy Performance of University Campus Buildings through BIM Software and Multicriteria Optimization Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Klaus D. Goepel, 2019. "Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process — A New Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 445-463, March.
    12. Romero-Ramos, J.A. & Gil, J.D. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R.A. & Arias, I. & Pérez-García, M., 2023. "A GIS-AHP approach for determining the potential of solar energy to meet the thermal demand in southeastern Spain productive enclaves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Dinesh Seth & Minhaj Ahemad A. Rehman, 2022. "Critical success factors‐based strategy to facilitate green manufacturing for responsible business: An application experience in Indian context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2786-2806, November.
    14. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    15. Tamer F. Abdelmaguid & Waleed Elrashidy, 2019. "Halting decisions for gas pipeline construction projects using AHP: a case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 179-199, March.
    16. Billal Hossen & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2021. "Land Suitability Assessment for Pulse (Green Gram) Production through Remote Sensing, GIS and Multicriteria Analysis in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Oliveira, Gilson Adamczuk & Tan, Kim Hua & Guedes, Bruno Turmina, 2018. "Lean and green approach: An evaluation tool for new product development focused on small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 62-73.
    18. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    19. Alao, M.A. & Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Popoola, O.M., 2020. "Multi-criteria decision based waste to energy technology selection using entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique: The case study of Lagos, Nigeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Mustafa Topuz & Mehmet Deniz, 2023. "Application of GIS and AHP for land use suitability analysis: case of Demirci district (Turkey)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121011357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.