IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v150y2021ics1364032121007498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Analysis of hill-climbing MPPT algorithms under low irradiance levels

Author

Listed:
  • Jately, Vibhu
  • Azzopardi, Brian
  • Joshi, Jyoti
  • Venkateswaran V, Balaji
  • Sharma, Abhinav
  • Arora, Sudha

Abstract

Adaptive hill-climbing MPPT algorithms have superior performance as opposed to their conventional counterparts under medium-high irradiance. However, the performance of these hill-climbing algorithms remains mostly unknown under low irradiance condition. The low irradiance conditions are prominent in tropical countries during rainy seasons and niche PV applications. Additionally, several thin-film photovoltaic (PV) technologies have better efficiency under low irradiance conditions. Hence, the optimum operation of MPPT algorithms under low irradiance conditions is vital. In the real-time implementation, MPPT algorithms can fail to detect the incremental changes in voltage and current under low irradiance conditions. Hence, analog to digital converter (ADC) resolution becomes a critical constraint that governs the performance of hill-climbing (HC) MPPT algorithms. This work entails a detailed calculation to determine the perturbation step-sizes of the MPPT algorithms under a wide range of irradiance. Two distinct perturbation step-sizes are determined corresponding to the minimum and optimum change in voltage and current due to perturbation, that is sensed by the ADC. The authors also defined a general expression to determine the optimum digitized step-size for duty-based perturb and observe algorithm under low irradiance condition. This expression is formulated by considering the resolution of the ADC and the desirability of keeping the power oscillations at an acceptable level. Finally, the performance of eight hill-climbing algorithms for two distinct step-sizes is analyzed on a small-scale experimental prototype under both uniform and sudden changes in low values of irradiance. The statistical analysis validates that the adaptive HC drift-free MPPT algorithm outperforms other HC algorithms when implemented with the optimum perturbation step-size under low irradiance conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jately, Vibhu & Azzopardi, Brian & Joshi, Jyoti & Venkateswaran V, Balaji & Sharma, Abhinav & Arora, Sudha, 2021. "Experimental Analysis of hill-climbing MPPT algorithms under low irradiance levels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121007498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121007498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sumathi, Vijayan & Jayapragash, R. & Bakshi, Abhinav & Kumar Akella, Praveen, 2017. "Solar tracking methods to maximize PV system output – A review of the methods adopted in recent decade," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 130-138.
    2. Mohanty, Parimita & Bhuvaneswari, G. & Balasubramanian, R. & Dhaliwal, Navdeep Kaur, 2014. "MATLAB based modeling to study the performance of different MPPT techniques used for solar PV system under various operating conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 581-593.
    3. Joshi, Puneet & Arora, Sudha, 2017. "Maximum power point tracking methodologies for solar PV systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1154-1177.
    4. Danandeh, M.A. & Mousavi G., S.M., 2018. "Comparative and comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking methods for PV cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2743-2767.
    5. Ram, J. Prasanth & Babu, T. Sudhakar & Rajasekar, N., 2017. "A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 826-847.
    6. Jately, V. & Arora, S., 2017. "Development of a dual-tracking technique for extracting maximum power from PV systems under rapidly changing environmental conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 557-571.
    7. Ahmed, Jubaer & Salam, Zainal, 2015. "An improved perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for higher efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 97-108.
    8. Issaadi, Wassila & Issaadi, Salim & Khireddine, Abdelkrim, 2018. "Comparative study of photovoltaic system optimization techniques: Contribution to the improvement and development of new approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2112-2127.
    9. Bendib, Boualem & Belmili, Hocine & Krim, Fateh, 2015. "A survey of the most used MPPT methods: Conventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 637-648.
    10. Verma, Deepak & Nema, Savita & Shandilya, A.M. & Dash, Soubhagya K., 2016. "Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques: Recapitulation in solar photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1018-1034.
    11. Enany, Mohamed A. & Farahat, Mohamed A. & Nasr, Ahmed, 2016. "Modeling and evaluation of main maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaics systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1578-1586.
    12. Eltawil, Mohamed A. & Zhao, Zhengming, 2013. "MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 793-813.
    13. Karami, Nabil & Moubayed, Nazih & Outbib, Rachid, 2017. "General review and classification of different MPPT Techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kishore, D.J. Krishna & Mohamed, M.R. & Sudhakar, K. & Peddakapu, K., 2023. "Swarm intelligence-based MPPT design for PV systems under diverse partial shading conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Mohamed Derbeli & Cristian Napole & Oscar Barambones & Jesus Sanchez & Isidro Calvo & Pablo Fernández-Bustamante, 2021. "Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Panel: A Review and Experimental Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    3. Gao, Fang & Hu, Rongzhao & Yin, Linfei, 2023. "Variable boundary reinforcement learning for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic grid-connected systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kermadi, Mostefa & Berkouk, El Madjid, 2017. "Artificial intelligence-based maximum power point tracking controllers for Photovoltaic systems: Comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 369-386.
    2. Venkateswari, R. & Sreejith, S., 2019. "Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 376-394.
    3. Rezk, Hegazy & AL-Oran, Mazen & Gomaa, Mohamed R. & Tolba, Mohamed A. & Fathy, Ahmed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Olabi, A.G. & El-Sayed, Abou Hashema M., 2019. "A novel statistical performance evaluation of most modern optimization-based global MPPT techniques for partially shaded PV system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Arshdeep Singh & Shimi Sudha Letha, 2019. "Emerging energy sources for electric vehicle charging station," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2043-2082, October.
    5. Boukenoui, R. & Ghanes, M. & Barbot, J.-P. & Bradai, R. & Mellit, A. & Salhi, H., 2017. "Experimental assessment of Maximum Power Point Tracking methods for photovoltaic systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 324-340.
    6. Singh, Bhuwan Pratap & Goyal, Sunil Kumar & Siddiqui, Shahbaz Ahmed & Saraswat, Amit & Ucheniya, Ravi, 2022. "Intersection Point Determination Method: A novel MPPT approach for sudden and fast changing environmental conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 614-632.
    7. Poompavai, T. & Kowsalya, M., 2019. "Control and energy management strategies applied for solar photovoltaic and wind energy fed water pumping system: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 108-122.
    8. Abderrazek Saoudi & Saber Krim & Mohamed Faouzi Mimouni, 2021. "Enhanced Intelligent Closed Loop Direct Torque and Flux Control of Induction Motor for Standalone Photovoltaic Water Pumping System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Başoğlu, Mustafa Engin & Çakır, Bekir, 2016. "Comparisons of MPPT performances of isolated and non-isolated DC–DC converters by using a new approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1100-1113.
    10. Vavilapalli, Sridhar & Umashankar, S. & Sanjeevikumar, P. & Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. & Mihet-Popa, Lucian & Fedák, Viliam, 2018. "Three-stage control architecture for cascaded H-Bridge inverters in large-scale PV systems – Real time simulation validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1111-1127.
    11. Julio López Seguel & Seleme I. Seleme & Lenin M. F. Morais, 2022. "Comparative Study of Buck-Boost, SEPIC, Cuk and Zeta DC-DC Converters Using Different MPPT Methods for Photovoltaic Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Belhachat, Faiza & Larbes, Cherif, 2017. "Global maximum power point tracking based on ANFIS approach for PV array configurations under partial shading conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 875-889.
    13. Victor Andrean & Pei Cheng Chang & Kuo Lung Lian, 2018. "A Review and New Problems Discovery of Four Simple Decentralized Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms—Perturb and Observe, Incremental Conductance, Golden Section Search, and Newton’s Quadratic Int," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Osmani, Khaled & Haddad, Ahmad & Lemenand, Thierry & Castanier, Bruno & Ramadan, Mohamad, 2021. "An investigation on maximum power extraction algorithms from PV systems with corresponding DC-DC converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Ram, J.Prasanth & Rajasekar, N. & Miyatake, Masafumi, 2017. "Design and overview of maximum power point tracking techniques in wind and solar photovoltaic systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1138-1159.
    16. Grażyna Frydrychowicz-Jastrzębska & Artur Bugała, 2021. "Solar Tracking System with New Hybrid Control in Energy Production Optimization from Photovoltaic Conversion for Polish Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Baldwin Cortés & Roberto Tapia & Juan J. Flores, 2021. "System-Independent Irradiance Sensorless ANN-Based MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Hsen Abidi & Lilia Sidhom & Ines Chihi, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review and Benchmarking for Photovoltaic MPPT Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-45, April.
    19. Haidar Islam & Saad Mekhilef & Noraisyah Binti Mohamed Shah & Tey Kok Soon & Mehdi Seyedmahmousian & Ben Horan & Alex Stojcevski, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Maximum Power Point Tracking Approaches and Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Julio López Seguel & Seleme I. Seleme, 2021. "Robust Digital Control Strategy Based on Fuzzy Logic for a Solar Charger of VRLA Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121007498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.