IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v138y2021ics1364032120307759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential of power-to-heat demand response to improve the flexibility of the energy system: An empirical review

Author

Listed:
  • Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z.
  • Markovska, Natasa
  • Abazi, Alajdin
  • Duić, Neven

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic review of 34 large-scale projects of power-to-heat demand response. The projects have been classified in terms of location, size, technical implementation and objective. The chronological ordering of the reviewed projects enables key takeaways to be drawn considering other developments in the energy sector, such as its restructuring and the emergence of competing flexibility options. The presented approach provides renewed insight to the debate on power-to-heat demand response diffusion. Historically, power-to-heat demand response has been used because of its wide availability on the demand side. Within utility programs, it has mostly been used to deal with infrastructure capacity limitations. This is still a major driver for power-to-heat demand response today. To address the challenges that come with the integration of renewable energy sources, more recent research projects have focused on exploring its capability to provide real-time balancing and frequency response at a smaller scale. The literature review suggests that the period of energy sector restructuring introduced uncertainty to energy companies regarding power-to-heat demand response and thus influenced its use. This period is now superseded by developments focused on electricity markets that are open to the demand side. Considering the flexibility requirement of the future energy system, new opportunities arise for power-to-heat demand response. Based on a critical analysis of the technical and regulatory changes, this paper makes the claim that the economic and policy frameworks have had a much more significant effect on the varying diffusion of power-to-heat demand response than the effect of the control and information technologies. In that sense, market rules should be carefully tailored so as to unlock the flexibility not only of power-to-heat demand response, but also of other flexibility resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Gjorgievski, Vladimir Z. & Markovska, Natasa & Abazi, Alajdin & Duić, Neven, 2021. "The potential of power-to-heat demand response to improve the flexibility of the energy system: An empirical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120307759
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120307759
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M. & Espatolero, Sergio, 2017. "Power to Gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 292-312.
    2. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2001. "Opportunities and perils of the newly liberalized European electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 419-427, May.
    3. Paterakis, Nikolaos G. & Erdinç, Ozan & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 871-891.
    4. Obinna, Uchechi & Joore, Peter & Wauben, Linda & Reinders, Angele, 2017. "Comparison of two residential Smart Grid pilots in the Netherlands and in the USA, focusing on energy performance and user experiences," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 264-275.
    5. Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Chang, Miguel & Werner, Sven & Svendsen, Svend & Sorknæs, Peter & Thorsen, Jan Eric & Hvelplund, Frede & Mortensen, Bent Ole Gram & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Boje, 2018. "The status of 4th generation district heating: Research and results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 147-159.
    6. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Tielens, Pieter & Van Hertem, Dirk, 2016. "The relevance of inertia in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 999-1009.
    8. Vine, Edward L., 1996. "International DSM and DSM program evaluation: An indeep assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 983-996.
    9. O׳Connell, Niamh & Pinson, Pierre & Madsen, Henrik & O׳Malley, Mark, 2014. "Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 686-699.
    10. Groppi, Daniele & Pfeifer, Antun & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A review on energy storage and demand side management solutions in smart energy islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Darby, Sarah J., 2020. "Demand response and smart technology in theory and practice: Customer experiences and system actors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Stenner, Karen & Frederiks, Elisha R. & Hobman, Elizabeth V. & Cook, Stephanie, 2017. "Willingness to participate in direct load control: The role of consumer distrust," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 76-88.
    13. Markovska, Natasa & Duić, Neven & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Guzović, Zvonimir & Piacentino, Antonio & Schlör, Holger & Lund, Henrik, 2016. "Addressing the main challenges of energy security in the twenty-first century – Contributions of the conferences on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1504-1512.
    14. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    15. Nadel, Steven & Geller, Howard, 1996. "Utility DSM : What have we learned? Where are we going?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 289-302, April.
    16. Kohlhepp, Peter & Harb, Hassan & Wolisz, Henryk & Waczowicz, Simon & Müller, Dirk & Hagenmeyer, Veit, 2019. "Large-scale grid integration of residential thermal energy storages as demand-side flexibility resource: A review of international field studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 527-547.
    17. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    18. Wang, Jianhui & Bloyd, Cary N. & Hu, Zhaoguang & Tan, Zhongfu, 2010. "Demand response in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1592-1597.
    19. Bloess, Andreas & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2018. "Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 212, pages 1611-1626.
    20. Good, Nicholas & Ellis, Keith A. & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2017. "Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 57-72.
    21. Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Connolly, David & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2017. "Smart energy and smart energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 556-565.
    22. Wei, Congying & Xu, Jian & Liao, Siyang & Sun, Yuanzhang & Jiang, Yibo & Ke, Deping & Zhang, Zhen & Wang, Jing, 2018. "A bi-level scheduling model for virtual power plants with aggregated thermostatically controlled loads and renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 659-670.
    23. Banerjee, Rangan, 1998. "Load management in the Indian power sector using US experience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 961-972.
    24. Colak, Ilhami & Fulli, Gianluca & Sagiroglu, Seref & Yesilbudak, Mehmet & Covrig, Catalin-Felix, 2015. "Smart grid projects in Europe: Current status, maturity and future scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 58-70.
    25. Malhotra, Abhishek & Battke, Benedikt & Beuse, Martin & Stephan, Annegret & Schmidt, Tobias, 2016. "Use cases for stationary battery technologies: A review of the literature and existing projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 705-721.
    26. Luthander, Rasmus & Widén, Joakim & Nilsson, Daniel & Palm, Jenny, 2015. "Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 80-94.
    27. Torriti, Jacopo & Hassan, Mohamed G. & Leach, Matthew, 2010. "Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1575-1583.
    28. Broeer, Torsten & Fuller, Jason & Tuffner, Francis & Chassin, David & Djilali, Ned, 2014. "Modeling framework and validation of a smart grid and demand response system for wind power integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 199-207.
    29. Grein, Arne & Pehnt, Martin, 2011. "Load management for refrigeration systems: Potentials and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5598-5608, September.
    30. Nolan, Sheila & O’Malley, Mark, 2015. "Challenges and barriers to demand response deployment and evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-10.
    31. Mathieu, Johanna L. & Dyson, Mark E.H. & Callaway, Duncan S., 2015. "Resource and revenue potential of California residential load participation in ancillary services," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 76-87.
    32. Di Santo, Katia Gregio & Kanashiro, Eduardo & Di Santo, Silvio Giuseppe & Saidel, Marco Antonio, 2015. "A review on smart grids and experiences in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1072-1082.
    33. Söder, Lennart & Lund, Peter D. & Koduvere, Hardi & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland & Rossebø, Geir Høyvik & Rosenlund-Soysal, Emilie & Skytte, Klaus & Katz, Jonas & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2018. "A review of demand side flexibility potential in Northern Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 654-664.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    3. Stede, Jan & Arnold, Karin & Dufter, Christa & Holtz, Georg & von Roon, Serafin & Richstein, Jörn C., 2020. "The role of aggregators in facilitating industrial demand response: Evidence from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Schellenberg, C. & Lohan, J. & Dimache, L., 2020. "Comparison of metaheuristic optimisation methods for grid-edge technology that leverages heat pumps and thermal energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula, 2019. "Review and assessment of the different categories of demand response potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 280-294.
    6. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Ricciardi, Guido & de Santoli, Livio, 2023. "Smart energy systems for renewable energy communities: A comparative analysis of power-to-X strategies for improving energy self-consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    7. Cruz, Marco R.M. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 338-353.
    8. Pallonetto, Fabiano & De Rosa, Mattia & D’Ettorre, Francesco & Finn, Donal P., 2020. "On the assessment and control optimisation of demand response programs in residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Kohlhepp, Peter & Harb, Hassan & Wolisz, Henryk & Waczowicz, Simon & Müller, Dirk & Hagenmeyer, Veit, 2019. "Large-scale grid integration of residential thermal energy storages as demand-side flexibility resource: A review of international field studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 527-547.
    10. Ribó-Pérez, D. & Carrión, A. & Rodríguez García, J. & Álvarez Bel, C., 2021. "Ex-post evaluation of Interruptible Load programs with a system optimisation perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    11. Nilsson, Anders & Bartusch, Cajsa, 2024. "Empowered or enchained? Exploring consumer perspectives on Direct Load Control," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Topi Rasku & Juha Kiviluoma, 2018. "A Comparison of Widespread Flexible Residential Electric Heating and Energy Efficiency in a Future Nordic Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "Process-to-market matrix mapping: A multi-criteria evaluation framework for industrial processes’ electricity market participation feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    15. Devenish, Anna, 2023. "Institutional and contextual drivers of and barriers to incentive-based demand response: A comparative case study in the Pacific Northwest," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Tang, Hong & Wang, Shengwei & Li, Hangxin, 2021. "Flexibility categorization, sources, capabilities and technologies for energy-flexible and grid-responsive buildings: State-of-the-art and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2018. "What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3570-3581.
    18. Scharnhorst, L. & Sloot, D. & Lehmann, N. & Ardone, A. & Fichtner, W., 2024. "Barriers to demand response in the commercial and industrial sectors – An empirical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PB).
    19. Sneum, Daniel Møller & González, Mario Garzón & Gea-Bermúdez, Juan, 2021. "Increased heat-electricity sector coupling by constraining biomass use?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Norouzi, Farshid & Hoppe, Thomas & Elizondo, Laura Ramirez & Bauer, Pavol, 2022. "A review of socio-technical barriers to Smart Microgrid development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120307759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.