Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Xinxin
- Wei, Haonan
Abstract
Due to the low thermal-to-power conversion efficiency of low-temperature geothermal energy, low-temperature geothermal energy driven Kalina cycle system (KCS) 11, 34, and 34g were designed and have been widely studied. Two reconstructed systems installing a second vapor-liquid separator are proposed for each of the above three Kalina cycle systems in this paper. In the A-reconstructed system, the second separator is positioned between the original separator and regenerator (regenerator-1 in KCS 34). In the B-reconstructed system, the second separator is placed downstream of the original absorber. Thermodynamic performance comparison of these systems shows that the two reconstructed systems of KCS 34 and KCS 34g are superior to their respective original systems. The B-reconstructed system of KCS 11 only outperforms the original system at high evaporating pressures and with a high ammonia mass concentration. The B-reconstructed system performs better when used for KCS 34, while the A-reconstructed system performs better when used for KCS 34g, and the two reconstructed systems perform close to each other when used for KCS 11. Comparing three original cycles and their respective two reconstructed cycles, it can be observed that KCS 34 and its two reconstructed cycles exhibit the best performance, KCS 34g and its reconstructed systems exhibit the worst, while have a wider ammonia mass concentration range. Evaporators contribute the largest exergy loss in all systems. The highest thermal efficiencies of 10.99 %, 12.65 %, and 10.92 % and the highest exergy efficiencies of 54.38 %, 62.59 %, and 54.03 % can be obtained at an evaporating pressure of 3 MPa, corresponding to B-reconstructed system of KCS 11, B-reconstructed system of KCS 34, and A-reconstructed system of KCS 34g, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Xinxin & Wei, Haonan, 2026.
"Low-temperature geothermal energy utilization improvement based on the addition of a second vapor-liquid separator in Kalina cycle systems,"
Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027879
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.125123
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.