IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v159y2020icp683-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of electrochemical advanced oxidation on the long-term operation of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor treating 4-chlorophenol containing wastewater

Author

Listed:
  • De Coster, Jonas
  • Liu, Jia
  • Van den Broeck, Rob
  • Rossi, Barbara
  • Dewil, Raf
  • Appels, Lise

Abstract

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) systems are of specific interest for the treatment of high organic wastewater since they offer the opportunity to recover energy in the form of methane (biogas). The technology is highly suitable for the degradation of biodegradable organics, but its efficiency can be significantly hampered by the presence of toxic pollutants in the water. In this study, the use of electrochemical advanced oxidation (eAOP) coupled to a lab-scale UASB reactor for the degradation of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) in wastewater was investigated. The eAOP treatment consisted of the electrochemical production of active chlorine at a Ti/RuO2–IrO2 anode with a fixed current density of 25 mA/cm2 in the recycle of the UASB reactor. It was noticed that the total COD removal efficiency decreased from 75.8% when no 4-CP was present in the wastewater to 25.6% and 13.6% after the addition of 100 ppm and 50 ppm 4-CP, respectively. Furthermore, elevated levels of volatile fatty acids and ORP were observed in the effluent of the reactor, indicating process failure. It was postulated that the decrease in COD removal efficiency was due to the release of high amounts of hypochlorite, causing an oxidative environment in the anaerobic reactor. This hypochlorite may have reacted with several components such as ammonia to form other toxic components (e.g., chloramine).

Suggested Citation

  • De Coster, Jonas & Liu, Jia & Van den Broeck, Rob & Rossi, Barbara & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2020. "Influence of electrochemical advanced oxidation on the long-term operation of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor treating 4-chlorophenol containing wastewater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 683-692.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:683-692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120305693
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yimin Deng & Renaud Ansart & Jan Baeyens & Huili Zhang, 2019. "Flue Gas Desulphurization in Circulating Fluidized Beds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Lohani, Sunil Prasad & Wang, Shuai & Lackner, Susanne & Horn, Harald & Khanal, Sanjay Nath & Bakke, Rune, 2016. "ADM1 modeling of UASB treating domestic wastewater in Nepal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 263-268.
    3. Chan, Pak Chuen & de Toledo, Renata Alves & Shim, Hojae, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and domestic wastewater – Effect of intermittent feeding on short and long chain fatty acids accumulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 129-135.
    4. Rosa, A.P. & Chernicharo, C.A.L. & Lobato, L.C.S. & Silva, R.V. & Padilha, R.F. & Borges, J.M., 2018. "Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources (biogas and sludge) in a full-scale UASB-based treatment plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 21-26.
    5. Ning, Yan-Yan & Wang, Shao-Feng & Jin, Da-Wei & Harada, Hideki & Shi, Xian-Yang, 2013. "Formation of hydrogen-producing granules and microbial community analysis in a UASB reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 12-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azad Pashaki, Saeed Ghanbari & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Ebrahimi-Nik, Mohammadali & Rohani, Abbas, 2021. "Treatment of municipal landfill leachate: Optimization of organic loading rate in a two-stage CSTR followed by aerobic degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1210-1221.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartocci, Pietro & Abad, Alberto & Mattisson, Tobias & Cabello, Arturo & Loscertales, Margarita de las Obras & Negredo, Teresa Mendiara & Zampilli, Mauro & Taiana, Andrea & Serra, Angela & Arauzo, Inm, 2022. "Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) developed by coupling a Pressurised Chemical Looping combustor with a turbo expander: How to optimize plant efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Al Afif, Rafat & Linke, Bernd, 2019. "Biogas production from three-phase olive mill solid waste in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1046-1052.
    3. A. Sinan Akturk & Goksel N. Demirer, 2020. "Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Yahui Zhou & Shaobo Liu & Yunguo Liu & Xiaofei Tan & Ni Liu & Jun Wen, 2020. "Efficient Removal 17-Estradiol by Graphene-Like Magnetic Sawdust Biochar: Preparation Condition and Adsorption Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Costa, Alexis & Coppitters, Diederik & Dubois, Lionel & Contino, Francesco & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2024. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    6. Felipe Solferini de Carvalho & Luiz Carlos Bevilaqua dos Santos Reis & Pedro Teixeira Lacava & Fernando Henrique Mayworm de Araújo & João Andrade de Carvalho Jr., 2023. "Substitution of Natural Gas by Biomethane: Operational Aspects in Industrial Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Li Nie & Jiayi Lu & Qigang Deng & Liming Gong & Dayong Xue & Zhongzhi Yang & Xiaofeng Lu, 2022. "Study on the Uniformity of Secondary Air of a 660 MW Ultra-Supercritical CFB Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Schiochet Pinto, Luane & Pinheiro Neto, Daywes & de Leles Ferreira Filho, Anésio & Domingues, Elder Geraldo, 2020. "An alternative methodology for analyzing the risk and sensitivity of the economic viability for generating electrical energy with biogas from the anaerobic bio-digestion of vinasse," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1401-1410.
    9. Montecchio, D. & Braguglia, C.M. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A., 2017. "A model-based tool for reactor configuration of thermophilic biogas plants fed with Waste Activated Sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 411-419.
    10. Adhikari, J.R. & Lohani, S.P., 2019. "Design, installation, operation and experimentation of septic tank – UASB wastewater treatment system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1406-1415.
    11. Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Lovato, Giovanna & Domingues Rodrigues, José Alberto & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin, 2024. "Amendments to model frameworks to optimize the anaerobic digestion and support the green transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Zhen, Guangyin & Pan, Yang & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhang, Zhongyi & Niu, Chengxin & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Kobayashi, Takuro & Zhao, Youcai & Xu, Kaiqin, 2019. "Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Patrycja Pochwatka & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Piotr Sołowiej & Agnieszka Wawrzyniak & Jacek Dach, 2020. "Biogas Plant Exploitation in a Middle-Sized Dairy Farm in Poland: Energetic and Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Bedoić, Robert & Špehar, Ana & Puljko, Josip & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Opportunities and challenges: Experimental and kinetic analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rendering industry streams for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Du, Haixia & Shao, Zongping, 2022. "Synergistic effects between solid potato waste and waste activated sludge for waste-to-power conversion in microbial fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    16. Li, Shuo & Baeyens, Jan & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise & Zhang, Huili & Deng, Yimin, 2021. "Advances in rigid porous high temperature filters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Castelló, Elena & Nunes Ferraz-Junior, Antonio Djalma & Andreani, Cristiane & Anzola-Rojas, Melida del Pilar & Borzacconi, Liliana & Buitrón, Germán & Carrillo-Reyes, Julián & Gomes, Simone Damasceno , 2020. "Stability problems in the hydrogen production by dark fermentation: Possible causes and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Xueshen Wang & Zheng Gan & Shengwei Xin & Chunzhen Yang, 2023. "Study on Gas–Solid Two–Phase Flow Characteristics of One–Furnace with Two–Tower Semi–Dry Desulfurization in Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Kalisz, Sylwester & Wejkowski, Robert & Maj, Izabella & Garbacz, Przemysław, 2023. "A novel approach to the dry desulfurization process by means of sodium bicarbonate: A full-scale study on SO2 emission and geochemistry of fly ash," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Yong Hu & Haiyuan Ma & Jiang Wu & Takuro Kobayashi & Kai-Qin Xu, 2022. "Performance Comparison of CSTR and CSFBR in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Grease Trap Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:683-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.