IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v147y2020ip1p2102-2117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Analysis of three different silicon-based Technologies in Composite Climate Condition – Part II – Seasonal assessment and performance degradation rates using statistical tools

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Rashmi
  • Sharma, Madhu
  • Rawat, Rahul
  • Banerjee, Chandan

Abstract

This paper is an extension study to the ‘Field Analysis of three different Silicon-based Technologies in Composite Climate Condition’ wherein, monthly average performance ratio, temperature corrected performance ratio, series resistance and effective peak power of multi-crystalline (mc-si), heterojunction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT) and amorphous silicon (a-si) based photovoltaic modules for three years were presented. The present study attempts to investigate seasonal performance and determine the degradation rates using three statistical tools, i.e. linear regression, classical seasonal decomposition (CSD), and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) on normalized performance ratio and normalized efficiency for three years. Further, comparative analysis of nine PV modules, i.e. three modules of each technology, and sensitivity analysis of solar irradiance and module temperature on performance ratio have been evaluated. The degradation rates are found to be 1.24%/year, 1.16%/year and 1.16%/year for a-si modules, 0.14%/year, 0.56%/year and 0.11%/year for HIT modules and 1.50%/year, 0.82%/year and 1.46%/year for mc-si modules using linear regression, CSD and LOESS analysis respectively. The average efficiency is found to be 5.17% for a-si, 15.40% for HIT and 10.78% of mc-si modules. Furthermore, the performance of these module technologies during particular season after three years of outdoor operation has also been assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Rawat, Rahul & Banerjee, Chandan, 2020. "Field Analysis of three different silicon-based Technologies in Composite Climate Condition – Part II – Seasonal assessment and performance degradation rates using statistical tools," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2102-2117.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:147:y:2020:i:p1:p:2102-2117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119315022
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rawat, Rahul & Singh, Ramayan & Sastry, O.S. & Kaushik, S.C., 2017. "Performance evaluation of micromorph based thin film photovoltaic modules in real operating conditions of composite climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 537-548.
    2. Debije, Michael G. & Tzikas, Chris & de Jong, Minne M. & Kanellis, Michalis & Slooff, Lenneke H., 2018. "The solar noise barrier project: 3. The effects of seasonal spectral variation, cloud cover and heat distribution on the performance of full-scale luminescent solar concentrator panels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 335-343.
    3. Djordjevic, Sinisa & Parlevliet, David & Jennings, Philip, 2014. "Detectable faults on recently installed solar modules in Western Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 215-221.
    4. Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Rawat, Rahul & Banerjee, Chandan, 2018. "An assessment of series resistance estimation techniques for different silicon based SPV modules," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 199-216.
    5. Muñoz, J.V. & Nofuentes, G. & Fuentes, M. & de la Casa, J. & Aguilera, J., 2016. "DC energy yield prediction in large monocrystalline and polycrystalline PV plants: Time-domain integration of Osterwald's model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 951-960.
    6. Balaska, Amira & Tahri, Ali & Tahri, Fatima & Stambouli, Amine Boudghene, 2017. "Performance assessment of five different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions in Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-60.
    7. Gaglia, Athina G. & Lykoudis, Spyros & Argiriou, Athanassios A. & Balaras, Constantinos A. & Dialynas, Evangelos, 2017. "Energy efficiency of PV panels under real outdoor conditions–An experimental assessment in Athens, Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 236-243.
    8. Phinikarides, Alexander & Makrides, George & Zinsser, Bastian & Schubert, Markus & Georghiou, George E., 2015. "Analysis of photovoltaic system performance time series: Seasonality and performance loss," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 51-63.
    9. Tossa, Alain K. & Soro, Y.M. & Thiaw, L. & Azoumah, Y. & Sicot, Lionel & Yamegueu, D. & Lishou, Claude & Coulibaly, Y. & Razongles, Guillaume, 2016. "Energy performance of different silicon photovoltaic technologies under hot and harsh climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 261-270.
    10. Elibol, Erdem & Özmen, Özge Tüzün & Tutkun, Nedim & Köysal, Oğuz, 2017. "Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 651-661.
    11. Kaldellis, John K. & Kapsali, Marina & Kavadias, Kosmas A., 2014. "Temperature and wind speed impact on the efficiency of PV installations. Experience obtained from outdoor measurements in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 612-624.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olczak, Piotr, 2023. "Evaluation of degradation energy productivity of photovoltaic installations in long-term case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    2. Piliougine, Michel & Sánchez-Friera, Paula & Petrone, Giovanni & Sánchez-Pacheco, Francisco José & Spagnuolo, Giovanni & Sidrach-de-Cardona, Mariano, 2022. "New model to study the outdoor degradation of thin–film photovoltaic modules," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 857-869.
    3. Tuhibur Rahman & Ahmed Al Mansur & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Md. Siddikur Rahman & Ratil H. Ashique & Mohamad Abou Houran & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Eklas Hossain, 2023. "Investigation of Degradation of Solar Photovoltaics: A Review of Aging Factors, Impacts, and Future Directions toward Sustainable Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Jaeun Kim & Matheus Rabelo & Siva Parvathi Padi & Hasnain Yousuf & Eun-Chel Cho & Junsin Yi, 2021. "A Review of the Degradation of Photovoltaic Modules for Life Expectancy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Yadav, Kamlesh, 2022. "Degradation and reliability analysis of photovoltaic modules after operating for 12 years: A case study with comparisons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1170-1186.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Yadav, Kamlesh, 2022. "Degradation and reliability analysis of photovoltaic modules after operating for 12 years: A case study with comparisons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1170-1186.
    2. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2017. "Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-587.
    3. Bouaichi, Abdellatif & El Amrani, Aumeur & Ouhadou, Malika & Lfakir, Aberrazak & Messaoudi, Choukri, 2020. "In-situ performance and degradation of three different photovoltaic module technologies installed in arid climate of Morocco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Santhakumari, Manju & Sagar, Netramani, 2019. "A review of the environmental factors degrading the performance of silicon wafer-based photovoltaic modules: Failure detection methods and essential mitigation techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 83-100.
    5. Nofuentes, Gustavo & de la Casa, Juan & Solís-Alemán, Ernesto M. & Fernández, Eduardo F., 2017. "Spectral impact on PV performance in mid-latitude sunny inland sites: Experimental vs. modelled results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1857-1868.
    6. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2019. "Experimental validation of performance and degradation study of canal-top photovoltaic system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 102-118.
    7. Dias, César Luiz de Azevedo & Castelo Branco, David Alves & Arouca, Maurício Cardoso & Loureiro Legey, Luiz Fernando, 2017. "Performance estimation of photovoltaic technologies in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 367-375.
    8. Silvestre, Santiago & Tahri, Ali & Tahri, Fatima & Benlebna, Soumiya & Chouder, Aissa, 2018. "Evaluation of the performance and degradation of crystalline silicon-based photovoltaic modules in the Saharan environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 57-63.
    9. Chikh, Madjid & Berkane, Smain & Mahrane, Achour & Sellami, Rabah & Yassaa, Noureddine, 2021. "Performance assessment of a 400 kWp multi- technology photovoltaic grid-connected pilot plant in arid region of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 488-501.
    10. Balaska, Amira & Tahri, Ali & Tahri, Fatima & Stambouli, Amine Boudghene, 2017. "Performance assessment of five different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions in Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-60.
    11. Jha, Aprajeeta & Tripathy, P.P., 2019. "Heat transfer modeling and performance evaluation of photovoltaic system in different seasonal and climatic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 856-865.
    12. Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Rawat, Rahul & Banerjee, Chandan, 2018. "An assessment of series resistance estimation techniques for different silicon based SPV modules," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 199-216.
    13. Gulkowski, Slawomir & Muñoz Diez, José Vicente & Aguilera Tejero, Jorge & Nofuentes, Gustavo, 2019. "Computational modeling and experimental analysis of heterojunction with intrinsic thin-layer photovoltaic module under different environmental conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 380-390.
    14. Hasan, Ahmed & Sarwar, Jawad & Shah, Ali Hasan, 2018. "Concentrated photovoltaic: A review of thermal aspects, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 835-852.
    15. Zia R. Tahir & Ammara Kanwal & Muhammad Asim & M. Bilal & Muhammad Abdullah & Sabeena Saleem & M. A. Mujtaba & Ibham Veza & Mohamed Mousa & M. A. Kalam, 2022. "Effect of Temperature and Wind Speed on Efficiency of Five Photovoltaic Module Technologies for Different Climatic Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    16. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Chandel, S.S., 2017. "Identification of relevant input variables for prediction of 1-minute time-step photovoltaic module power using Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression Models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 955-969.
    17. Agata Zdyb & Slawomir Gulkowski, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Four Different Photovoltaic Technologies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Dag, H.I. & Buker, M.S., 2020. "Performance evaluation and degradation assessment of crystalline silicon based photovoltaic rooftop technologies under outdoor conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1292-1300.
    19. Ruixiaoxiao Zhang & Geoffrey QP Shen & Meng Ni & Johnny Wong, 2020. "The relationship between energy consumption and gross domestic product in Hong Kong (1992–2015): Evidence from sectoral analysis and implications on future energy policy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 215-236, March.
    20. Zhang, Minhui & Zhang, Qin & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Punishment or reward? Strategies of stakeholders in the quality of photovoltaic plants based on evolutionary game analysis in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:147:y:2020:i:p1:p:2102-2117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.