IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v124y2018icp95-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation into thin layer drying rates and equilibrium moisture content of abattoir paunch waste

Author

Listed:
  • Spence, Jennifer
  • Buttsworth, David
  • McCabe, Bernadette K.
  • Baillie, Craig
  • Antille, Diogenes L.
  • Carter, Brad

Abstract

The work reported in this article was conducted to determine thin layer drying rates and equilibrium moisture contents of abattoir paunch waste. The equilibrium moisture content of paunch varied from 7.14% to 13.12% for drying in air between 35 and 55 °C, and at 40–80% relative humidity. A predictive equilibrium moisture content equation based on the Chung-Pfost model was developed with the constants A found to be 586.72, B (27.461), and C (28.913) with a standard error of ±0.0035. These values were comparable to the published values for wheat and barley. The thin layer drying constant, k, varied from 0.00023 to 0.0029 min-n with an average time exponent, n, value of 1.42 for air temperatures in the range of 35–55 °C. The variation in drying rates demonstrated a significant sensitivity to humidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Spence, Jennifer & Buttsworth, David & McCabe, Bernadette K. & Baillie, Craig & Antille, Diogenes L. & Carter, Brad, 2018. "Investigation into thin layer drying rates and equilibrium moisture content of abattoir paunch waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 95-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:124:y:2018:i:c:p:95-102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117306444
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ortner, Markus & Wöss, David & Schumergruber, Alexander & Pröll, Tobias & Fuchs, Werner, 2015. "Energy self-supply of large abattoir by sustainable waste utilization based on anaerobic mono-digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 460-471.
    2. Ware, Aidan & Power, Niamh, 2016. "Biogas from cattle slaughterhouse waste: Energy recovery towards an energy self-sufficient industry in Ireland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 541-549.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spence, Jennifer & Buttsworth, David & Carter, Brad, 2022. "Energy content, bulk density, and the latent heat of vaporisation characteristics of abattoir paunch waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Zhao, Zhong & Feng, Shuo & Zhao, Yaying & Wang, Zhuozhi & Ma, Jiao & Xu, Lianfei & Yang, Jiancheng & Shen, Boxiong, 2022. "Investigation on the fuel quality and hydrophobicity of upgraded rice husk derived from various inert and oxidative torrefaction conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1234-1248.
    3. Moussaoui, Haytem & Bahammou, Younes & Tagnamas, Zakaria & Kouhila, Mounir & Lamharrar, Abdelkader & Idlimam, Ali, 2021. "Application of solar drying on the apple peels using an indirect hybrid solar-electrical forced convection dryer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 131-140.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2020. "A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Hassan, Muhammad & Zhao, Chao & Ding, Weimin, 2020. "Enhanced methane generation and biodegradation efficiencies of goose manure by thermal-sonication pretreatment and organic loading management in CSTR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Tasnia Hassan Nazifa & Noori M. Cata Saady & Carlos Bazan & Sohrab Zendehboudi & Adnan Aftab & Talib M. Albayati, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Blood from Slaughtered Livestock: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Dikonketso Shirleymay Matjuda & Memory Tekere & Mary-Jane Thaela-Chimuka, 2024. "Impact of Thermal Pretreatment on the Physicochemical Characteristics and Biomethane Yield Potential of Solid Slaughter Waste from High-Throughput Red Meat Abattoirs Valorized as a Potential Feedstock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Grosser, A. & Neczaj, E. & Jasinska, Anna & Celary, P., 2020. "The influence of grease trap sludge sterilization on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-997.
    6. O'Shea, Richard & Lin, Richen & Wall, David M. & Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D, 2020. "Using biogas to reduce natural gas consumption and greenhouse gas emissions at a large distillery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Loganath, Radhakrishnan & Senophiyah-Mary, J., 2020. "Critical review on the necessity of bioelectricity generation from slaughterhouse industry waste and wastewater using different anaerobic digestion reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. A. C. Marcos & A. Al-Kassir & Francisco Cuadros & Talal Yusaf, 2017. "Treatment of Slaughterhouse Waste Water Mixed with Serum from Lacteal Industry of Extremadura in Spain to Produce Clean Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    10. Chen, Wen-Lih & Currao, Gaetano & Li, Yueh-Heng & Kao, Chien-Chun, 2023. "Employing Taguchi method to optimize the performance of a microscale combined heat and power system with Stirling engine and thermophotovoltaic array," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Ware, Aidan & Power, Niamh, 2017. "Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 50-59.
    12. Derseh Yilie Limeneh & Tamrat Tesfaye & Million Ayele & Nuredin Muhammed Husien & Eyasu Ferede & Adane Haile & Wassie Mengie & Amare Abuhay & Gemeda Gebino Gelebo & Magdi Gibril & Fangong Kong, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Utilization of Slaughterhouse By-Product: Current Status and Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Abbas, Tahir & Ali, Ghaffar & Adil, Sultan Ali & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Kamran, Muhammad Asif, 2017. "Economic analysis of biogas adoption technology by rural farmers: The case of Faisalabad district in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 431-439.
    14. Vilvert, Amanda Junkes & Saldeira Junior, Joaquim Carlos & Bautitz, Ivonete Rossi & Zenatti, Dilcemara Cristina & Andrade, Maurício Guy & Hermes, Eliane, 2020. "Minimization of energy demand in slaughterhouses: Estimated production of biogas generated from the effluent," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Joseph Yankyera Kusi & Florian Empl & Ralf Müller & Stefan Pelz & Jens Poetsch & Gregor Sailer & Rainer Kirchhof & Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi & Francis Attiogbe & Sarah Elikplim Siabi, 2024. "Evaluation of Energetic Potential of Slaughterhouse Waste and Its Press Water Obtained by Pressure-Induced Separation via Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Sarker, Swati Anindita & Wang, Shouyang & Adnan, K.M. Mehedi & Sattar, M. Nahid, 2020. "Economic feasibility and determinants of biogas technology adoption: Evidence from Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:124:y:2018:i:c:p:95-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.