IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4346-d1398922.html

Use of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors for Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy and Meat Industry By-Products for Biogas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Neri

    (Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Ferdinand Hummel

    (Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, BOKU University, Konrad-Lorenz. Straße 20, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria)

  • Souraya Benalia

    (Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Zimbalatti

    (Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Wolfgang Gabauer

    (Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, BOKU University, Konrad-Lorenz. Straße 20, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria)

  • Ivana Mihajlovic

    (Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, BOKU University, Konrad-Lorenz. Straße 20, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria)

  • Bruno Bernardi

    (Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Abstract

The dairy and meat industries generate thousands of tons of organic waste and by-products each year, making them two of the least environmentally sustainable sectors. Typical waste includes not only processing by-products such as curds but also commercial products that are defective or unsaleable due to expiration or damaged packaging. This study aimed to evaluate the methanogenic potential of a mixture of 80% inedible curds and 20% expired sausages, as a substrate, using two continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR). The reactors were fed daily with increasing doses of the 80–20% mixture and an organic loading rate ranging from 0.31 gVS/litre/day at the beginning of the trials to 7.20 gVS/litre/day toward the end. The produced biogas was continuously analysed from both quantitative and qualitative point of view. Also, the process was continuously monitored by withdrawing samples from each reactor during the whole process, to analyse their physical–chemical parameters, including pH, total solids (TS), total volatile solids (TVS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonium nitrogen (NH4 + -N), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and total volatile fatty acids (VFA). The results of this study show a promising increase in biogas production with the increase in feed. In terms of biogas production, organic waste from the dairy and meat industry shows the potential to be exploited as a substrate to produce biomethane. Indeed, in this study, biomethane cumulative production reached 410.86 NL CH4 ∙gTVS −1 using an 8 L capacity reactor filled up to 6 L. This makes the tested by-products usable as a renewable energy source in the future, particularly within a circular economy approach, helping to mitigate the effects of global warming and addressing sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Neri & Ferdinand Hummel & Souraya Benalia & Giuseppe Zimbalatti & Wolfgang Gabauer & Ivana Mihajlovic & Bruno Bernardi, 2024. "Use of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors for Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy and Meat Industry By-Products for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4346-:d:1398922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4346/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4346/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ware, Aidan & Power, Niamh, 2016. "Biogas from cattle slaughterhouse waste: Energy recovery towards an energy self-sufficient industry in Ireland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 541-549.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    2. Yao, Tianfu & Song, Junnian & Xing, Jiahao & Yang, Wei, 2025. "Water-energy-waste metabolic integration unlocks co-benefits in China's food processing sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Chen, Wen-Lih & Currao, Gaetano & Li, Yueh-Heng & Kao, Chien-Chun, 2023. "Employing Taguchi method to optimize the performance of a microscale combined heat and power system with Stirling engine and thermophotovoltaic array," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Velusamy Mozhiarasi & Pious Michealammal Benish Rose & Dirk Weichgrebe & Shanmugham Venkatachalam Srinivasan, 2025. "Comparative study on effect of shredding and extrusion on biogas production from cauliflower and banana peduncle wastes," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 22795-22821, September.
    5. Francesco Arfelli & Cristian Tosi & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Sangyeol Jo & Rahul Kadam & Heewon Jang & Dongyun Seo & Jungyu Park, 2024. "Elucidating Synergetic Effects of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Slaughterhouse Waste with Livestock Manures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2020. "A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Orlando Corigliano & Pietropaolo Morrone & Angelo Algieri, 2025. "Navigating the Challenges of Sustainability in the Food Processing Chain: Insights into Energy Interventions to Reduce Footprint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-40, January.
    9. Spence, Jennifer & Buttsworth, David & McCabe, Bernadette K. & Baillie, Craig & Antille, Diogenes L. & Carter, Brad, 2018. "Investigation into thin layer drying rates and equilibrium moisture content of abattoir paunch waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 95-102.
    10. Ware, Aidan & Power, Niamh, 2017. "Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 50-59.
    11. Dikonketso Shirleymay Matjuda & Memory Tekere & Mary-Jane Thaela-Chimuka, 2024. "Impact of Thermal Pretreatment on the Physicochemical Characteristics and Biomethane Yield Potential of Solid Slaughter Waste from High-Throughput Red Meat Abattoirs Valorized as a Potential Feedstock for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Derseh Yilie Limeneh & Tamrat Tesfaye & Million Ayele & Nuredin Muhammed Husien & Eyasu Ferede & Adane Haile & Wassie Mengie & Amare Abuhay & Gemeda Gebino Gelebo & Magdi Gibril & Fangong Kong, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Utilization of Slaughterhouse By-Product: Current Status and Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Abbas, Tahir & Ali, Ghaffar & Adil, Sultan Ali & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Kamran, Muhammad Asif, 2017. "Economic analysis of biogas adoption technology by rural farmers: The case of Faisalabad district in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 431-439.
    14. Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska & Marcin Niemiec & Jakub Sikora & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Elżbieta Olech & Edyta Molik & Jakub Gajda, 2024. "The Impact of Biochar Additives and Fat-Emulsifying Substances on the Efficiency of the Slaughterhouse Waste Biogasing Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Vilvert, Amanda Junkes & Saldeira Junior, Joaquim Carlos & Bautitz, Ivonete Rossi & Zenatti, Dilcemara Cristina & Andrade, Maurício Guy & Hermes, Eliane, 2020. "Minimization of energy demand in slaughterhouses: Estimated production of biogas generated from the effluent," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Loganath, Radhakrishnan & Senophiyah-Mary, J., 2020. "Critical review on the necessity of bioelectricity generation from slaughterhouse industry waste and wastewater using different anaerobic digestion reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Joseph Yankyera Kusi & Florian Empl & Ralf Müller & Stefan Pelz & Jens Poetsch & Gregor Sailer & Rainer Kirchhof & Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi & Francis Attiogbe & Sarah Elikplim Siabi, 2024. "Evaluation of Energetic Potential of Slaughterhouse Waste and Its Press Water Obtained by Pressure-Induced Separation via Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Sarker, Swati Anindita & Wang, Shouyang & Adnan, K.M. Mehedi & Sattar, M. Nahid, 2020. "Economic feasibility and determinants of biogas technology adoption: Evidence from Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. A. C. Marcos & A. Al-Kassir & Francisco Cuadros & Talal Yusaf, 2017. "Treatment of Slaughterhouse Waste Water Mixed with Serum from Lacteal Industry of Extremadura in Spain to Produce Clean Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Czekała, Wojciech & Frankowski, Jakub & Sieracka, Dominika & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Witaszek, Kamil & Dudnyk, Alla & Zielińska, Aleksandra & Wisła-Świder, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2025. "The energy efficiency analysis of sorghum waste biomass grown in a temperate climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4346-:d:1398922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.