IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i9p1328-1344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations

Author

Listed:
  • Vanem, Erik
  • Antão, Pedro
  • Østvik, Ivan
  • de Comas, Francisco Del Castillo

Abstract

This paper presents a generic, high-level risk assessment of the global operation of ocean-going liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers. The analysis collects and combines information from several sources such as an initial hazid, a thorough review of historic LNG accidents, review of previous studies, published damage statistics and expert judgement, and develops modular risk models for critical accident scenarios. In accordance with these risk models, available information from different sources has been structured in the form of event trees for different generic accident categories. In this way, high-risk areas pertaining to LNG shipping operations have been identified. The major contributions to the risk associated with LNG shipping are found to stem from five generic accident categories, i.e. collision, grounding, contact, fire and explosion, and events occurring while loading or unloading LNG at the terminal. Of these, collision risk was found to be the highest. According to the risk analysis presented in this paper, both the individual and the societal risk level associated with LNG carrier operations lie within the As Low As Reasonable Practicable (ALARP) area, meaning that further risk reduction should be required only if available cost-effective risk control options could be identified. This paper also includes a critical review of the various components of the risk models and hence identifies areas of improvements and suggests topics for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanem, Erik & Antão, Pedro & Østvik, Ivan & de Comas, Francisco Del Castillo, 2008. "Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(9), pages 1328-1344.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:9:p:1328-1344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007002025
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, J. & Foinikis, P., 2001. "Formal safety assessment of containerships," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 143-157, March.
    2. Hu, Shenping & Fang, Quangen & Xia, Haibo & Xi, Yongtao, 2007. "Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 369-377.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Puisa, Romanas & Montewka, Jakub & Krata, Przemyslaw, 2023. "A framework estimating the minimum sample size and margin of error for maritime quantitative risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Siqi Wang & Jingbo Yin & Rafi Ullah Khan, 2020. "The Multi-State Maritime Transportation System Risk Assessment and Safety Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Miana, Mario & Hoyo, Rafael del & Rodrigálvarez, Vega & Valdés, José Ramón & Llorens, Raúl, 2010. "Calculation models for prediction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) ageing during ship transportation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1687-1700, May.
    6. Goran STANKOVIĆ & Stojan PETELIN & Peter VIDMAR & Marko PERKOVIČ, 2017. "Influence Of Implementation Of Technologically Advanced Evacuation Models On The Process Of Decreasing The Risk During Accidents In An Lng Terminal," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 12(1), pages 25-38, March.
    7. Martins, Marcelo Ramos & Maturana, Marcos Coelho, 2013. "Application of Bayesian Belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-109.
    8. Hoang, Anh Tuan & Pandey, Ashok & Martinez De Osés, Francisco Javier & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Said, Zafar & Ng, Kim Hoong & Ağbulut, Ümit & Tarełko, Wiesław & Ölçer, Aykut I. & Nguyen, Xuan Phuong, 2023. "Technological solutions for boosting hydrogen role in decarbonization strategies and net-zero goals of world shipping: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Valdez Banda, Osiris A. & Kannos, Sirpa & Goerlandt, Floris & van Gelder, Pieter H.A.J.M. & Bergström, Martin & Kujala, Pentti, 2019. "A systemic hazard analysis and management process for the concept design phase of an autonomous vessel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. HÃ¥vold, Jon Ivar, 2010. "Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 511-519.
    11. Hosack, Geoffrey R. & Hayes, Keith R. & Barry, Simon C., 2017. "Prior elicitation for Bayesian generalised linear models with application to risk control option assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 351-361.
    12. Berle, Øyvind & Asbjørnslett, Bjørn Egil & Rice, James B., 2011. "Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 696-705.
    13. Atiq Siddiqui & Manish Verma, 2013. "An Expected Consequence Approach to Route Choice in the Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2041-2055, November.
    14. Fernández, Ignacio Arias & Gómez, Manuel Romero & Gómez, Javier Romero & Insua, Álvaro Baaliña, 2017. "Review of propulsion systems on LNG carriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1395-1411.
    15. Hu, Jinqiu & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Laibin, 2021. "Dynamic resilience assessment of the Marine LNG offloading system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Saleh Aseel & Hussein Al-Yafei & Murat Kucukvar & Nuri C. Onat, 2021. "Life Cycle Air Emissions and Social Human Health Impact Assessment of Liquified Natural Gas Maritime Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Ilyas & Zhihong Jin & Irfan Ullah & Abbas Agha Jafri, 2023. "Investigation of Risk Factors Influencing the Safety of Maritime Containers Supply Chain: In the Period of the Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yishu Zheng & Wayne K. Talley & Di Jin & ManWo Ng, 2016. "Crew injuries in container vessel accidents," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 541-551, July.
    3. Molin Sun & Zhongyi Zheng & Longhui Gang, 2018. "Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimated Risk in Formal Safety Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Goerlandt, Floris & Montewka, Jakub, 2015. "Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 115-134.
    5. Szlapczynski, Rafal & Szlapczynska, Joanna, 2021. "A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and Collision Alert Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Zhang, D. & Yan, X.P. & Yang, Z.L. & Wall, A. & Wang, J., 2013. "Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 93-105.
    7. Feng, Zhichao & Zhou, Zhijie & Hu, Changhua & Ban, Xiaojun & Hu, Guanyu, 2020. "A safety assessment model based on belief rule base with new optimization method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Chikha, Paulina & Skorupski, Jacek, 2022. "The risk of an airport traffic accident in the context of the ground handling personnel performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Atiq W. Siddiqui & Manish Verma, 2018. "Assessing risk in the intercontinental transportation of crude oil," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(2), pages 280-299, June.
    10. Gino J. Lim & Jaeyoung Cho & Selim Bora & Taofeek Biobaku & Hamid Parsaei, 2018. "Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 765-786, December.
    11. Atiq Siddiqui & Manish Verma, 2013. "An Expected Consequence Approach to Route Choice in the Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2041-2055, November.
    12. Kim, Kyungmee O. & Yang, Yoonjung & Zuo, Ming J., 2013. "A new reliability allocation weight for reducing the occurrence of severe failure effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 81-88.
    13. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    14. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & Di Zhang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "Three‐Stage Decision‐Making Model under Restricted Conditions for Emergency Response to Ships Not under Control," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2455-2474, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:9:p:1328-1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.