IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v244y2024ics0951832024000334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual nature of cyber–physical power systems and the mitigation strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Xiao
  • Wang, Huan
  • Zhang, Xi
  • Ma, Chuang
  • Zhang, Hai-Feng

Abstract

Cyber–physical power system (CPPS) offers benefits in terms of enhanced grid operation and improved performance, but it also brings forth new threats to the power system posed by digital intelligence. In this paper, we propose a general cascading failure model to analyze the vulnerability of CPPS when facing various attack modes (physical attacks and information attacks). In addition, we introduce an all-type connected islands (ACI) mechanism in model to reflect the fact that a well-working island should contain all types of nodes. Then we conduct experiments under different scenarios, such as different attack modes, different coupling strategies, and different power flow calculation models. Our findings demonstrate that, on the one hand, the introduction of ACI enlarges the cascading failure size in CPPS. On the other hand, the double-edged sword effect of CPPS exists in various scenarios. Furthermore, given the potential threat of information attacks, we propose a fused centrality index from the perspectives of structure and function, and apply it to two mitigation strategies before and during the cascading process. Experimental results show that these strategies are effective in mitigating the damages of the information attacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Xiao & Wang, Huan & Zhang, Xi & Ma, Chuang & Zhang, Hai-Feng, 2024. "Dual nature of cyber–physical power systems and the mitigation strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.109958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024000334
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.109958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.