IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v242y2024ics0951832023006488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty-aware trustworthy weather-driven failure risk predictor for overhead contact lines

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jian
  • Gao, Shibin
  • Yu, Long
  • Liu, Xingyang
  • Neri, Ferrante
  • Zhang, Dongkai
  • Kou, Lei

Abstract

Overhead contact lines (OCLs) are electric transmission lines that power railways, which are constantly threatened by external weather and environmental factors due to their outdoor location. Hence, for the long-term functioning of railway lines, a weather-driven risk predictor is an essential tool. Current prediction methods mainly adopt a single-point estimation system with fixed weights of neural networks and therefore cannot propagate the uncertainties within the data and model, resulting in unreliable predictions. To enhance safety-risk prevention capabilities, this paper proposes an uncertainty-aware trustworthy weather-driven failure-risk approach for OCLs, in a probabilistic deep multitask learning framework. Firstly, a deep Gaussian process is employed as the backbone model to deal with imbalanced weather-related failure datasets with limited fault samples. Moreover, a multi-task learning framework is embedded to simultaneously predict the multiple weather-driven failure risks under lightning, wind and haze. Finally, the predictive uncertainty is decomposed into epistemic and aleatory uncertainties, where epistemic and aleatory uncertainties account for the uncertainty within the model and data, respectively. Extensive experiments on actual OCLs are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, which can effectively capture the predictive uncertainty and provide trustworthy predictive decisions of mitigating operational risk for railway operators.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jian & Gao, Shibin & Yu, Long & Liu, Xingyang & Neri, Ferrante & Zhang, Dongkai & Kou, Lei, 2024. "Uncertainty-aware trustworthy weather-driven failure risk predictor for overhead contact lines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006488
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023006488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.