IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v220y2022ics0951832021007420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A condition-based maintenance model considering multiple maintenance effects on the dependent failure processes

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Qiannan
  • Ma, Lin
  • Wang, Naichao
  • Chen, Ankang
  • Jiang, Qihang

Abstract

Maintenance is generally assumed to play a positive role, however, in reality, it is also common that maintenance actions have negative impacts. In this paper, a condition-based maintenance model for repairable systems subject to dependent failure processes (soft failure due to system degradation and hard failure due to random shocks) is proposed. It is a unified model with strong compatibility. The effects of maintenance actions with negative or positive effects incurred by inspection, preventive maintenance and corrective maintenance are all considered. In order to show the effects of maintenance actions intuitively, a vector space spanned by the degradation level, deteriorate rate and hard failure threshold is constructed. It can easily show the complex and multiple effects between maintenance impacts. Finally, the model is used to deal with high-voltage transmission lines’ maintenance optimization problem. The results show that the model is feasible and can be applied in the field of maintenance optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Qiannan & Ma, Lin & Wang, Naichao & Chen, Ankang & Jiang, Qihang, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance model considering multiple maintenance effects on the dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:220:y:2022:i:c:s0951832021007420
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021007420
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro, I.T., 2009. "A model of imperfect preventive maintenance with dependent failure modes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 217-224, July.
    2. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    3. de Jonge, Bram, 2019. "Discretizing continuous-time continuous-state deterioration processes, with an application to condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-5.
    4. Liu, Bin & Wu, Shaomin & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 879-887.
    5. Yan, Tao & Lei, Yaguo & Li, Naipeng & Wang, Biao & Wang, Wenting, 2021. "Degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction for dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    7. Zhou, Xiaojun & Wu, Changjie & Li, Yanting & Xi, Lifeng, 2016. "A preventive maintenance model for leased equipment subject to internal degradation and external shock damage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    9. Bressi, Sara & Santos, João & Losa, Massimo, 2021. "Optimization of maintenance strategies for railway track-bed considering probabilistic degradation models and different reliability levels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Xiang Wu & Sarah Ryan, 2010. "Value of condition monitoring for optimal replacement in the proportional hazards model with continuous degradation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 553-563.
    11. Wang, Xiaofei & Wang, Bing Xing & Hong, Yili & Jiang, Pei Hua, 2021. "Degradation data analysis based on gamma process with random effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1200-1208.
    12. Guo, Chiming & Wang, Wenbin & Guo, Bo & Si, Xiaosheng, 2013. "A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented systems based on Wiener degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 183-194.
    13. Austin J. Lemoine & Michael L. Wenocur, 1985. "On failure modeling," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 497-508, August.
    14. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling & Feng, Qianmei, 2019. "Optimization of on-condition thresholds for a system of degrading components with competing dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier & Syamsundar, Annamraju, 2017. "On geometric reduction of age or intensity models for imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 40-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazarizadeh, Farzaneh & Alemtabriz, Akbar & Zandieh, Mostafa & Raad, Abbas, 2022. "An analytical model for reliability assessment of the rail system considering dependent failures (case study of Iranian railway)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Jin, Yuxue & Geng, Jie & Lv, Chuan & Chi, Ying & Zhao, Tingdi, 2023. "A methodology for equipment condition simulation and maintenance threshold optimization oriented to the influence of multiple events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Dinh, Duc-Hanh & Do, Phuc & Iung, Benoit & Nguyen, Pham-The-Nhan, 2024. "Reliability modeling and opportunistic maintenance optimization for a multicomponent system with structural dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Liu, Yongchao & Wang, Guanjun & Liu, Peng, 2024. "A condition-based maintenance policy with non-periodic inspection for k-out-of-n: G systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Wang, Weikai & Chen, Xian, 2023. "Piecewise deterministic Markov process for condition-based imperfect maintenance models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Gan, Shuyuan & Hu, Hengheng & Coit, David W., 2023. "Maintenance optimization considering the mutual dependence of the environment and system with decreasing effects of imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Zhang, Wenyu & Zhang, Xiaohong & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xing & He, Zhen, 2024. "Optimal condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component repairable systems with economic dependence in a finite-horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Nguyen, Van-Thai & Do, Phuc & Vosin, Alexandre & Iung, Benoit, 2022. "Artificial-intelligence-based maintenance decision-making and optimization for multi-state component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Zhao, Xiujie & He, Shuguang & Xie, Min, 2018. "Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 108-119.
    5. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Liu, Bin & Wu, Shaomin & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 879-887.
    7. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Wang, Weikai & Chen, Xian, 2023. "Piecewise deterministic Markov process for condition-based imperfect maintenance models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Yang, Li & Ye, Zhi-sheng & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Yang, Su-fen & Peng, Rui, 2019. "A two-phase preventive maintenance policy considering imperfect repair and postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 966-977.
    10. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2022. "Reinforcement learning for adaptive maintenance policy optimization under imperfect knowledge of the system degradation model and partial observability of system states," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    14. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A. & Shemehsavar, S., 2020. "A dynamic auto-adaptive predictive maintenance policy for degradation with unknown parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 81-92.
    15. Thiago Lima de Barros & Rodrigo Sampaio Lopes, 2021. "Continuous improvement of imperfect maintenance actions in PAS and PAR models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 941-958, October.
    16. Shuyuan Gan & Bolun Wang & Zhifang Song, 2021. "A Combined Maintenance Strategy Considering Spares, Buffer, and Quality," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 431-445, June.
    17. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    18. Wu, Bei & Wei, Xiaohua & Zhang, Yamei & Bai, Sijun, 2023. "Modeling dynamic environment effects on dependent failure processes with varying failure thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    20. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:220:y:2022:i:c:s0951832021007420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.