IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v200y2020ics0951832019309007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance cost evaluation for heterogeneous complex systems under continuous monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Castro, Inma T.
  • Basten, Rob J.I.
  • van Houtum, Geert-Jan

Abstract

The maintenance strategy for a complex system consisting of both non-monitored and monitored components is analyzed in this paper. Non-monitored components can only be maintained correctively upon failure. Monitored components are monitored continuously and are maintained when they become too degraded, i.e., when its degradation level hits a threshold. For this complex system, an opportunistic maintenance strategy is implemented, meaning that a maintenance intervention for a component can be used as an opportunity for preventive maintenance of monitored components: If the degradation level of a monitored component exceeds a preventive threshold at the time of another maintenance intervention, this component is maintained preventively. By performing these maintenance actions, different costs are incurred. The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the expected cost rate of the system. To that end, two methods are compared: renewal and semi-regenerative techniques. Using renewal techniques, the evaluation of the expected cost rate of this maintenance strategy is time consuming, especially for a large number of monitored components. However, using semi-regenerative techniques the required computation time is drastically shortened: For a system with ten monitored components, the computation time to evaluate the optimal maintenance strategy goes from more than a day to few seconds. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the results. The conclusion is that for a large number of monitored components, semi-regenerative techniques are more appropriate to evaluate the expected cost rate in terms of computation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Castro, Inma T. & Basten, Rob J.I. & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2020. "Maintenance cost evaluation for heterogeneous complex systems under continuous monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019309007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019309007
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cholette, Michael E. & Yu, Hongyang & Borghesani, Pietro & Ma, Lin & Kent, Geoff, 2019. "Degradation modeling and condition-based maintenance of boiler heat exchangers using gamma processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 184-196.
    2. Poppe, Joeri & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2018. "A hybrid condition-based maintenance policy for continuously monitored components with two degradation thresholds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 515-532.
    3. Khac Tuan Huynh & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer & Inma T. Castro, 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Post-Print hal-00790728, HAL.
    4. Huynh, K.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C. & Castro, I.T., 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 497-508.
    5. Huynh, K.T., 2020. "Modeling past-dependent partial repairs for condition-based maintenance of continuously deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 152-163.
    6. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    7. M M Hosseini & R M Kerr & R B Randall, 1999. "A hybrid maintenance model with imperfect inspection for a system with deterioration and Poisson failure," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(12), pages 1229-1243, December.
    8. Ding, Fangfang & Tian, Zhigang, 2012. "Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 175-182.
    9. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    10. Sophie Mercier & Hai Ha Pham, 2014. "A condition‐based imperfect replacement policy for a periodically inspected system with two dependent wear indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 766-782, November.
    11. Joachim Arts & Rob Basten, 2018. "Design of multi-component periodic maintenance programs with single-component models," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 606-615, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Yao & Wei, Yian & Liao, Haitao, 2022. "Optimal sampling-based sequential inspection and maintenance plans for a heterogeneous product with competing failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    2. Hamdan, K. & Tavangar, M. & Asadi, M., 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance for repairable weighted k-out-of-n systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Zhang, Aibo & Zhang, Tieling & Barros, Anne & Liu, Yiliu, 2020. "Optimization of maintenances following proof tests for the final element of a safety-instrumented system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Esposito, Nicola & Mele, Agostino & Castanier, Bruno & GIORGIO, Massimiliano, 2023. "A hybrid maintenance policy for a deteriorating unit in the presence of three forms of variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2024. "The effect of model misspecification of the bounded transformed gamma process on maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Khac Tuan Huynh & Antoine Grall, 2020. "A condition-based maintenance model with past-dependent imperfect preventive repairs for continuously deteriorating systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 333-358, April.
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    8. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    9. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    10. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Hao, Yaqian, 2021. "Component rearrangement and system replacement for a system with stochastic degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Sun, Xuxue & Mraied, Hesham & Cai, Wenjun & Zhang, Qiong & Liang, Guoyuan & Li, Mingyang, 2018. "Bayesian latent degradation performance modeling and quantification of corroding aluminum alloys," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 84-96.
    12. N. C. Caballé & I. T. Castro, 2019. "Assessment of the maintenance cost and analysis of availability measures in a finite life cycle for a system subject to competing failures," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 255-290, March.
    13. Huynh, K.T. & Vu, H.C. & Nguyen, T.D. & Ho, A.C., 2022. "A predictive maintenance model for k-out-of-n:F continuously deteriorating systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Fauriat, William & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Optimization of an aperiodic sequential inspection and condition-based maintenance policy driven by value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    16. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    17. Keedy, Elias & Feng, Qianmei, 2012. "A physics-of-failure based reliability and maintenance modeling framework for stent deployment and operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 94-101.
    18. de Jonge, Bram, 2019. "Discretizing continuous-time continuous-state deterioration processes, with an application to condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-5.
    19. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Multi-objective design of aircraft maintenance using Gaussian process learning and adaptive sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    20. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019309007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.