IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v261y2025ics0951832025003667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic inspection model for predictive maintenance considering different degrees of inspection quality

Author

Listed:
  • Dinh, Duc-Hanh
  • Do, Phuc
  • Bui, Minh-Hien
  • Dang, Phuoc-Vinh

Abstract

In predictive maintenance (PdM), inspection plays a key role since it provides information about system health to support maintenance decision-making. However, inspection may be costly, which is one of the bottlenecks of the PdM. To reduce the overall inspection cost, this paper proposes a dynamic inspection model that incorporates three levels of inspection quality: (1) Binary state inspection, which is the cheapest one, can only reveal the binary state of the system, whether functioning or not; (2) Imperfect degradation inspection, which incurs a higher cost, but can provide the system state and degradation level with uncertainty; and (3) Perfect degradation inspection, which is the most expensive one, can provide the true system’s degradation level. Accordingly, at each inspection epoch, the inspection level is selected based on the predictive reliability of the system. By dynamically selecting the inspection level at each inspection epoch, the overall inspection cost of the system can be reduced. In that way, a reliability prediction model considering three kinds of inspections is first proposed for inspection and maintenance decision-making. Then, a maintenance cost model is developed to find the optimal predictive inspection and maintenance policy. Finally, a case study on predictive maintenance of an injection molding machine is conducted to investigate the applicability and benefit of the proposed dynamic inspection model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinh, Duc-Hanh & Do, Phuc & Bui, Minh-Hien & Dang, Phuoc-Vinh, 2025. "A dynamic inspection model for predictive maintenance considering different degrees of inspection quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003667
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.