IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v268y2024ics0925527323003390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity sharing between competing manufacturers: A collective good or a detrimental effect?

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xu
  • Peng, Ying
  • Wang, Xiaojun
  • Wang, Pengfei

Abstract

Capacity sharing has become a prevalent solution for addressing the supply-demand mismatch by optimizing capacity allocation among participating manufacturers. However, effective coordination and cooperation are required among involved parties, particularly if capacity sharing occurs between competing manufacturers. This paper investigates capacity sharing between competing manufacturers and examines the optimal sharing service fee policy, taking external market, internal operational, and relationship-specific factors into consideration. Our study incorporates product substitution rate, information symmetry (or asymmetry), and interfirm power relationship to go beyond the immediate direct cost-benefit analysis of capacity sharing and evaluates the trade-off between capacity sharing associated benefits and costs. Our analysis results illustrate how the market and relationship-specific factors interact with operational factors such as production cost difference and capacity constraints to influence firms' capacity sharing decisions. The broad set of decision outcomes derived from our comprehensive analyses is beneficial for companies of all sizes and shapes to make informed strategic and operational decisions according to their own circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xu & Peng, Ying & Wang, Xiaojun & Wang, Pengfei, 2024. "Capacity sharing between competing manufacturers: A collective good or a detrimental effect?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003390
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323003390
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.