IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v260y2023ics0925527323000889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploratory decision robustness analysis of the theory of constraints focusing process using system dynamics modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Machado, Mariana Paim
  • Abreu, Jaqueline Lilge
  • Morandi, Maria Isabel Motta
  • Piran, Fabio Sartori
  • Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco

Abstract

The classic P and Q problem is used to illustrate Throughput Accounting (TA) concepts proposed by the Theory of Constraints (TOC). Since the release of Throughput Accounting, several studies have been conducted, both to discuss it and to consider uncertainties. However, these uncertainties are included in isolation in each research. This limitation distances the analysis from the reality of companies, in which variations and uncertainties occur simultaneously. This study aims to verify whether decisions based on Throughput Accounting are robust when simultaneous variations occur, bringing the problem closer to the reality of companies. A System Dynamics model based on the P and Q problem was used, including simultaneous variability in different parameters. Finally, an analysis of the prevalent variables for decision-making was performed using Artificial Neural Networks. The results suggest robustness of decisions, even in systems with simultaneous variations. One contribution to the literature consists of the demonstration that the Throughput Accounting heuristic is robust in stochastic conditions, even though the original proposal was deterministic. Another contribution lies in the identification of the prevalent variables, so far unexplored by the literature. Finally, the robustness of Throughput Accounting to support product mix and constraint identification decisions in companies is evident in dynamic scenarios that feature variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Machado, Mariana Paim & Abreu, Jaqueline Lilge & Morandi, Maria Isabel Motta & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2023. "Exploratory decision robustness analysis of the theory of constraints focusing process using system dynamics modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:260:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323000889
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323000889
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary, Linnéusson & Amos, Ng H.C. & Tehseen, Aslam, 2018. "Towards strategic development of maintenance and its effects on production performance by using system dynamics in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 151-169.
    2. Amitava Ray & Bijan Sarkar & Subir Kumar Sanyal, 2008. "An improved theory of constraints," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 155-165, October.
    3. Marques, Alex & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Camargo, Luís Felipe Riehs & Teixeira, Rafael, 2014. "Exploring the relationship between marketing and operations: Neural network analysis of marketing decision impacts on delivery performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 178-190.
    4. R.P. Mohanty & D. Mishra & T. Mishra, 2009. "Comparative study of production outsourcing models," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 41-69, April.
    5. Linhares, Alexandre, 2009. "Theory of constraints and the combinatorial complexity of the product-mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 121-129, September.
    6. Siems, Erik & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2004. "Enhancing System-Wide Profitability With New Product Introduction And Throughput Accounting," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(03), pages 289-306.
    8. Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Lauri Lattila, 2008. "Throughput accounting and stochastic system behaviour: importance of low throughput products," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 123-142.
    9. Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Camanho, Ana S. & Silva, Maria C.A., 2021. "Internal benchmarking to assess the cost efficiency of a broiler production system combining data envelopment analysis and throughput accounting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Plenert, Gerhard, 1993. "Optimizing theory of constraints when multiple constrained resources exist," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 126-133, October.
    11. R.P. Mohanty & D. Mishra & T. Mishra, 2009. "Comparative study of production outsourcing models," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 41-69, April.
    12. Delis, Manthos D. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2018. "Measuring management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 65-77.
    13. R.P. Mohanty & D. Mishra & T. Mishra, 2009. "Comparative study of production outsourcing models," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 41-69, April.
    14. Barbosa, Luziane Machado & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori & Dresch, Aline, 2017. "Exploratory analysis of the variables prevailing on the effects of product modularization on production volume and efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 677-690.
    15. Davies, J. & Mabin, V.J. & Balderstone, S.J., 2005. "The theory of constraints: a methodology apart?--a comparison with selected OR/MS methodologies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 506-524, December.
    16. Bakke, Nils Arne & Hellberg, Roland, 1991. "Relevance lost? A critical discussion of different cost accounting principles in connection with decision making for both short and long term production scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kee, Robert & Schmidt, Charles, 2000. "A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Luigi Cantone & Pierpaolo Testa & Svend Hollensen & Giuseppe Fabio Cantone, 2019. "Outsourcing New Product Development Fostered By Disruptive Technological Innovation: A Decision-Making Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-45, January.
    3. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    4. Lea, Bih-Ru & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2002. "The impact of management accounting, product structure, product mix algorithm, and planning horizon on manufacturing performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 279-299, October.
    5. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Golmohammadi, Davood & Miller, Jason, 2019. "The moderating role of master production scheduling method on throughput in job shop systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 67-80.
    7. Zheng-Yun Zhuang & Shu-Chin Chang, 2017. "Deciding product mix based on time-driven activity-based costing by mixed integer programming," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 959-974, April.
    8. Davood Golmohammadi & S. Afshin Mansouri, 2015. "Complexity and workload considerations in product mix decisions under the theory of constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 357-369, August.
    9. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Lai, Chien-Wen & Tseng, Li-Jung & Chou, Wen-Chin, 2008. "Embedding management discretionary power into an ABC model for a joint products mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 210-220, September.
    10. Bhattacharya, Arijit & Vasant, Pandian, 2007. "Soft-sensing of level of satisfaction in TOC product-mix decision heuristic using robust fuzzy-LP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 55-70, February.
    11. Daraio, Cinzia & Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul, 2019. "Quality and its impact on efficiency," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019004, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shang-Yu Lai & Chu-Lun Hsieh, 2023. "Exploring the impact of different carbon emission cost models on corporate profitability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 41-74, March.
    13. Amanda Curry, 2019. "Across the great divide: a literature review of management accounting and operations management at the shop floor," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 75-119, February.
    14. Delis, Manthos D. & Iosifidi, Maria & Kazakis, Pantelis & Ongena, Steven & Tsionas, Mike G., 2022. "Management practices and M&A success," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Eichhorn Colombo, Konrad W., 2023. "Financial resilience analysis of floating production, storage and offloading plant operated in Norwegian Arctic region: Case study using inter-/transdisciplinary system dynamics modeling and simulatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Ribeiro, M.A. & Silveira, J.L. & Qassim, R.Y., 2007. "Joint optimisation of maintenance and buffer size in a manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 405-413, January.
    17. Lee, Jooh & Kwon, He-Boong, 2017. "Progressive performance modeling for the strategic determinants of market value in the high-tech oriented SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 91-102.
    18. Brocklesby, John, 2009. "Ethics beyond the model: How social dynamics can interfere with ethical practice in operational research/management science," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1073-1082, December.
    19. Miloš Lukić & Veselin Petričević & Nikola Delić & Nataša Tolimir & Vladimir Dosković & Simeon Rakonjac & Zdenka Škrbić, 2022. "How Does the Choice of Genotype and Feed in the Local Market Affect Broiler Performance and the Farm Economy? A Case Study in Serbia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shi-Yin Jhong, 2018. "Carbon Emissions Cost Analysis with Activity-Based Costing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:260:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323000889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.