IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v62y2015i5p357-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity and workload considerations in product mix decisions under the theory of constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Davood Golmohammadi
  • S. Afshin Mansouri

Abstract

The literature on the product mix decision (or master production scheduling) under the Theory of Constraints (TOC), which was developed in the past two decades, has addressed this problem as a static operational decision. Consequently, the developed solution techniques do not consider the system's dynamism and the associated challenges arising from the complexity of operations during the implementation of master production schedules. This paper aims to address this gap by developing a new heuristic approach for master production scheduling under the TOC philosophy that considers the main operational factors that influence actual throughput after implementation of the detailed schedule. We examine the validity of the proposed heuristic by comparison to Integer Linear Programming and two heuristics in a wide range of scenarios using simulation modelling. Statistical analyses indicate that the new algorithm leads to significantly enhanced performance during implementation for problems with setup times. The findings show that the bottleneck identification approach in current methods in the TOC literature is not effective and accurate for complex operations in real‐world job shop systems. This study contributes to the literature on master production scheduling and product mix decisions by enhancing the likelihood of achieving anticipated throughput during the implementation of the detailed schedule. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 62: 357–369, 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Davood Golmohammadi & S. Afshin Mansouri, 2015. "Complexity and workload considerations in product mix decisions under the theory of constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 357-369, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:5:p:357-369
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21632
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linhares, Alexandre, 2009. "Theory of constraints and the combinatorial complexity of the product-mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 121-129, September.
    2. Christos Koulamas & Shrikant. S. Panwalkar, 2013. "A note on combined job selection and sequencing problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(6), pages 449-453, September.
    3. Plenert, Gerhard, 1993. "Optimizing theory of constraints when multiple constrained resources exist," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 126-133, October.
    4. Fredendall, Lawrence D. & Ojha, Divesh & Wayne Patterson, J., 2010. "Concerning the theory of workload control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 99-111, February.
    5. Bhattacharya, Arijit & Vasant, Pandian, 2007. "Soft-sensing of level of satisfaction in TOC product-mix decision heuristic using robust fuzzy-LP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 55-70, February.
    6. Kangbok Lee & Lei Lei & Michael Pinedo, 2012. "Production scheduling with history‐dependent setup times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 58-68, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Golmohammadi, Davood & Miller, Jason, 2019. "The moderating role of master production scheduling method on throughput in job shop systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 67-80.
    2. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    2. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Golmohammadi, Davood & Miller, Jason, 2019. "The moderating role of master production scheduling method on throughput in job shop systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 67-80.
    4. Wellington, John F. & Guiffrida, Alfred L. & Lewis, Stephen A., 2014. "Interior analysis of the green product mix solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 966-974.
    5. Machado, Mariana Paim & Abreu, Jaqueline Lilge & Morandi, Maria Isabel Motta & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2023. "Exploratory decision robustness analysis of the theory of constraints focusing process using system dynamics modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Bhattacharya, Arijit & Vasant, Pandian, 2007. "Soft-sensing of level of satisfaction in TOC product-mix decision heuristic using robust fuzzy-LP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 55-70, February.
    7. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shang-Yu Lai & Chu-Lun Hsieh, 2023. "Exploring the impact of different carbon emission cost models on corporate profitability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 41-74, March.
    8. Kee, Robert & Schmidt, Charles, 2000. "A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Silva, Cristovao & Qu, Ting, 2017. "Drum-buffer-rope and workload control in High-variety flow and job shops with bottlenecks: An assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 116-127.
    10. Lea, Bih-Ru & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2002. "The impact of management accounting, product structure, product mix algorithm, and planning horizon on manufacturing performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 279-299, October.
    11. Ribeiro, M.A. & Silveira, J.L. & Qassim, R.Y., 2007. "Joint optimisation of maintenance and buffer size in a manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 405-413, January.
    12. Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2021. "Labor flexibility integration in workload control in Industry 4.0 era," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 420-433, December.
    13. Hasuike, Takashi & Ishii, Hiroaki, 2009. "On flexible product-mix decision problems under randomness and fuzziness," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 770-787, August.
    14. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2017. "On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4695-4711, August.
    15. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2016. "Job sequencing and selection within workload control order release: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1061-1075, February.
    16. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shi-Yin Jhong, 2018. "Carbon Emissions Cost Analysis with Activity-Based Costing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2016. "Card-based delivery date promising in pure flow shops with order release control," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(22), pages 6798-6811, November.
    18. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Qu, Ting & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2014. "The design of simple subcontracting rules for make-to-order shops: An assessment by simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 854-864.
    19. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2016. "Workload control in job shops with re-entrant flows: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5136-5150, September.
    20. Tien-Fu Liang, 2012. "Integrated manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multiple imprecise goals in an uncertain environment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-153, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:62:y:2015:i:5:p:357-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.