IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v118y2009i1p152-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buyer-supplier cooperation and negotiation support with random yield consideration

Author

Listed:
  • Kelle, Peter
  • Transchel, Sandra
  • Minner, Stefan

Abstract

Random yield is still prevailing in several industries despite quality improvement efforts. In this case, the supply chain partners jointly must find the best way to cope with yield uncertainty. We focus on the inventory-related costs that can be influenced by adjusting the ordering, setup, and delivery policy to the random yield. The yield model of having a random proportion of defective items is assumed with known mean and variance. Two alternative scenarios are examined: when the buyer or when the supplier makes 100% inspection. We provide analytic tools and approximations to optimize the decisions. Our main contribution is to help in the cooperation and negotiation process by showing under which circumstances have the yield characteristics important effects and when are they negligible. We show that not the average yield but the yield uncertainty plays the critical role mainly in providing an appropriate service level but also in finding the optimal shipment and setup policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelle, Peter & Transchel, Sandra & Minner, Stefan, 2009. "Buyer-supplier cooperation and negotiation support with random yield consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 152-159, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:118:y:2009:i:1:p:152-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(08)00259-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamal, A. M. M. & Sarker, Bhaba R., 1993. "An optimal batch size for a production system operating under a just-in-time delivery system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 255-260, September.
    2. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    3. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    4. Kelle, Peter & Miller, Pamela A. & Akbulut, Asli Y., 2007. "Coordinating ordering/shipment policy for buyer and supplier: Numerical and empirical analysis of influencing factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 100-110, July.
    5. Abraham Grosfeld-Nir & Yigal Gerchak, 2004. "Multiple Lotsizing in Production to Order with Random Yields: Review of Recent Advances," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 43-69, February.
    6. Prafulla N. Joglekar, 1988. "Note---Comments on "A Quantity Discount Pricing Model to Increase Vendor Profits"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(11), pages 1391-1398, November.
    7. M Ben-Daya & M Hariga, 2000. "Economic lot scheduling problem with imperfect production processes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(7), pages 875-881, July.
    8. Kelle, Peter & Al-khateeb, Faisal & Anders Miller, Pam, 2003. "Partnership and negotiation support by joint optimal ordering/setup policies for JIT," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 431-441, January.
    9. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    10. Sucky, Eric, 2006. "A bargaining model with asymmetric information for a single supplier-single buyer problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 516-535, June.
    11. Candace Arai Yano & Hau L. Lee, 1995. "Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 311-334, April.
    12. Charles J. Corbett & Xavier de Groote, 2000. "A Supplier's Optimal Quantity Discount Policy Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 444-450, March.
    13. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Cardenas-Barron, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2002. "Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality - a practical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 85-87, May.
    14. Can Huang & Luc Soete, 2008. "Policy forum," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(10), pages 771-781, December.
    15. Lee, Wenyih, 2005. "A joint economic lot size model for raw material ordering, manufacturing setup, and finished goods delivering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 163-174, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo Li & Mengqi Liu & Xu Guan, 2017. "Diversity of payment contracts in a decentralized assembly system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 613-639, October.
    2. Arifoglu, Kenan & Özekici, Süleyman, 2011. "Inventory management with random supply and imperfect information: A hidden Markov model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 123-137, November.
    3. Zare, Marjan & Esmaeili, Maryam & He, Yuanjie, 2019. "Implications of risk-sharing strategies on supply chains with multiple retailers and under random yield," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 413-424.
    4. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu, 2017. "Sourcing strategies under agglomeration economies, capacity risks and retail competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 311-322.
    5. Glock, Christoph H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 671-686.
    6. He, Yuanjie, 2013. "Sequential price and quantity decisions under supply and demand risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 541-551.
    7. Yu, Jonas C.P., 2013. "A collaborative strategy for deteriorating inventory system with imperfect items and supplier credits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 403-409.
    8. Laslo, Zohar & Gurevich, Gregory & Keren, Baruch, 2009. "Economic distribution of budget among producers for fulfilling orders under delivery chance constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 656-662, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    3. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    4. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    5. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    6. Maddah, Bacel & Moussawi, Lama & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2010. "Lot sizing with a Markov production process and imperfect items scrapped," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 340-347, April.
    7. Yassine, Ali & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen, 2012. "Disaggregation and consolidation of imperfect quality shipments in an extended EPQ model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 345-352.
    8. Lie-Fern Hsu & Jia-Tzer Hsu, 2016. "Economic production quantity (EPQ) models under an imperfect production process with shortages backordered," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 852-867, March.
    9. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    10. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    11. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    12. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    13. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    14. Anuraag Gutgutia & J. K. Jha, 2018. "A closed-form solution for the distribution free continuous review integrated inventory model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 159-186, April.
    15. Dey, O. & Giri, B.C., 2014. "Optimal vendor investment for reducing defect rate in a vendor–buyer integrated system with imperfect production process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 222-228.
    16. Nasr, Walid W. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2019. "Supplier development in a two-level lot sizing problem with non-conforming items and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 349-363.
    17. Rezaei, Jafar & Salimi, Negin, 2012. "Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 11-18.
    18. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    19. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2010. "Coordination between vendor and buyer considering trade credit and items of imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 52-61, January.
    20. B.C. Giri & S. Sharma, 2014. "Lot sizing and unequal-sized shipment policy for an integrated production-inventory system," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 888-901, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:118:y:2009:i:1:p:152-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.