IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v114y2008i1p91-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business process perspectives: Theoretical developments vs. real-world practice

Author

Listed:
  • Vergidis, K.
  • Turner, C.J.
  • Tiwari, A.

Abstract

Business processes have been discussed for more than a decade now. However, there are not as of yet comprehensive and substantial benefits that can justify the hype around the concept. This paper contrasts and summarises the main findings of literature research and a targeted survey conducted within the service industry in order to investigate the current state of research and practice regarding key aspects of business processes. The survey involved the participation of 25 respondents working in service industry sectors such as finance, public sector and consultancy. The paper demonstrates that although theoretical developments are dealing with sophisticated issues around business processes, the service industry is reluctant to adopt a similar perspective and still uses simple and manual techniques in dealing with business processes. The main reason is that the service industry is not convinced that a business process approach could bring significant tangible and measurable benefits. This is due to the fact that there is no comprehensive and systematic solution proposed in terms of a fully functional business process software suite. The requirements for an integrated business process management tool include some of the paper's findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Vergidis, K. & Turner, C.J. & Tiwari, A., 2008. "Business process perspectives: Theoretical developments vs. real-world practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 91-104, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:114:y:2008:i:1:p:91-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(08)00002-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aguilar-Saven, R.S.Ruth Sara, 2004. "Business process modelling: Review and framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 129-149, July.
    2. Volkner, Peer & Werners, Brigitte, 2000. "A decision support system for business process planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 633-647, September.
    3. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993. "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 90-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2014. "Deriving research agendas for manufacturing and logistics systems: A methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 49-61.
    2. Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 0. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-45.
    3. Piotr Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Aneta Wysokinska-Senkus & Angelika Panka, 2021. "Process Definitions - Critical Literature Review," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 241-255.
    4. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Céline Averseng, 2011. "How to structure the complexity without giving up the thematic exhaustiveness of a state of the art in management science? Feedback on the methodological contribution of classification tools of qualit," Post-Print hal-01992760, HAL.
    6. Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 2017. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 377-421, May.
    7. Silvestro, Rhian, 2014. "Performance topology mapping: understanding the drivers of performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 269-282.
    8. Mingook Lee & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Evaluating Internal Technological Capabilities in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar & Mohd Shamsul Mohd Shoid, 2020. "Ontology Application for the Organizational Goals," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 4871-4871, December.
    10. Garcia Martin, Patricia Carolina & Schroeder, Andreas & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali, 2019. "The value architecture of servitization: Expanding the research scope," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 438-449.
    11. Börner, René & Goeken, Matthias & Rabhi, Fethi, 2012. "SOA development and service identification: A case study on method use, context and success factors," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 189, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    12. Alicia Martin-Navarro & Maria Paula Lechuga Sancho & Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido, 2023. "BPMS for management: a systematic literature review," Papers 2312.00442, arXiv.org.
    13. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Aneta Wysokinska-Senkus & Angelika Panka, 2021. "Process Definitions - Critical Literature Review," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 241-255.
    2. Wieslaw Urban & Elzbieta Krawczyk-Dembicka, 2020. "An In-depth Investigation of Technology Management Process in the Metal Processing Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 115-136.
    3. Toppen, R. & Smits, M.T. & Ribbers, P.M.A., 1998. "Improving process performance through market network design : A study of the impact of electronic markets in the financial securities sector," Other publications TiSEM c3c8d2ea-7727-475e-83cf-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    5. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    6. V.K. Gupta, 2016. "Strategic framework for managing forces of continuity and change in innovation and risk management in service sector: a study of service industry in India," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17.
    7. Douglas Dean & Richard Orwig & Douglas Vogel, 2000. "Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 109-128, March.
    8. Harry Hummels & Patrick Nullens, 2022. "‘Other-wise’ Organizing. A Levinasian Approach to Agape in Work and Business Organisations," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 211-232, October.
    9. Magdalena LUCA (DEDIU), 2014. "Business Process Reengineering," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 233-236.
    10. Tina George Karippacheril & Soonhee Kim & Robert P. Jr. Beschel & Changyong Choi, 2016. "Bringing Government into the 21st Century," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 24579, December.
    11. Stephan Kudyba, 2006. "Enhancing Organisational Information Flow And Knowledge Creation In Re-Engineering Supply Chain Systems: An Analysis Of The U.S. Automotive Parts And Supplies Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 163-173.
    12. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.
    13. Csaba Deák, 2005. "Change by Successful Projects - IT and Change Projects in Hungary," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 3(01), pages 17-22.
    14. Daniele Binci, 2013. "L?equilibrio organizzativo attraverso il clima. L?evidenza empirica di un ente locale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 65-97.
    15. Vansina, L.S. & Taillieu, T.C.B., 1994. "Business process reengineering or socio-technical system design in new clothes?," WORC Paper 94.09.064/3, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    16. Rajat Roy & Justine Brown & Chris Gaze, 2003. "Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 137-146.
    17. Awolusi & Olawumi Dele & Akeke & Niyi Isreal & Akinruwa & Temitope Emmanuel, 2014. "Modeling Business Process Re-Engineering and Organizational Performance in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(5), pages 336-350.
    18. Jolanta Žemgulienė & Mantas Valukonis, 2018. "Structured literature review on business process performance analysis and evaluation," Post-Print hal-02121157, HAL.
    19. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Jacques Simonin & Selmin Nurcan & Judith Barrios, 2013. "Evolution organisationnelle fondée sur la cohérence des relations entre acteurs avec les buts métiers," Post-Print hal-00831621, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:114:y:2008:i:1:p:91-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.