IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v392y2013i7p1702-1711.html

Approximate tolerance limits for Zipf–Mandelbrot distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Young, D.S.

Abstract

Zipf–Mandelbrot distributions are commonly used to model natural phenomena where the frequency of an event’s occurrence is inversely proportional to its rank based on that frequency of occurrence. This discrete distribution typically exhibits a large number of rare events; however, it may be of interest to obtain reasonable limits that bound the majority of the number of different events. We propose the use of statistical tolerance limits as a way to quantify such a bound. The tolerance limits are constructed using Wald confidence limits for the Zipf–Mandelbrot parameters and are shown through a simulation study to have coverage probabilities near the nominal levels. We also calculate Zipf–Mandelbrot tolerance limits for two real datasets and discuss the associated computer code developed for the R programming language.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, D.S., 2013. "Approximate tolerance limits for Zipf–Mandelbrot distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(7), pages 1702-1711.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:392:y:2013:i:7:p:1702-1711
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.11.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437112010497
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2012.11.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barker L., 2002. "A Comparison of Nine Confidence Intervals for a Poisson Parameter When the Expected Number of Events is 5," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 56, pages 85-89, May.
    2. Zornig, Peter & Altmann, Gabriel, 1995. "Unified representation of Zipf distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 461-473, April.
    3. Kii, Masanobu & Akimoto, Keigo & Doi, Kenji, 2012. "Random-growth urban model with geographical fitness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(23), pages 5960-5970.
    4. Sinha, Sitabhra, 2006. "Evidence for power-law tail of the wealth distribution in India," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 555-562.
    5. Montemurro, Marcelo A., 2001. "Beyond the Zipf–Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 567-578.
    6. Young, Derek S., 2010. "tolerance: An R Package for Estimating Tolerance Intervals," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kedai Cheng & Derek S. Young, 2023. "An Approach for Specifying Trimming and Winsorization Cutoffs," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(2), pages 299-323, June.
    2. Coelho, Ricardo & Richmond, Peter & Barry, Joseph & Hutzler, Stefan, 2008. "Double power laws in income and wealth distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(15), pages 3847-3851.
    3. Kwame Boamah‐Addo & Tomasz J. Kozubowski & Anna K. Panorska, 2023. "A discrete truncated Zipf distribution," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(2), pages 156-187, May.
    4. Jan Schulz & Mishael Milaković, 2023. "How Wealthy are the Rich?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(1), pages 100-123, March.
    5. Kerim Eser Afc{s}ar & Mehmet Ozyi~git & Yusuf Yuksel & Umit Ak{i}nc{i}, 2021. "Testing the Goodwin Growth Cycles with Econophysics Approach in 2002-2019 Period in Turkey," Papers 2106.02546, arXiv.org.
    6. Wang, Yuanjun & You, Shibing, 2016. "An alternative method for modeling the size distribution of top wealth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 443-453.
    7. Néda, Zoltán & Gere, István & Biró, Tamás S. & Tóth, Géza & Derzsy, Noemi, 2020. "Scaling in income inequalities and its dynamical origin," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    8. Guillermo Vinue & Irene Epifanio, 2021. "Robust archetypoids for anomaly detection in big functional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(2), pages 437-462, June.
    9. Matthew A. Ohemeng & Tomasz J. Kozubowski, 2025. "Discrete-Continuous Dual Families, Reciprocal Laws, Random Summation, and Mixtures of Gaussian Distributions," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 87(2), pages 741-789, August.
    10. Anindya S. Chakrabarti & Arnab Chatterjee & Tushar Nandi & Asim Ghosh & Anirban Chakraborti, 2018. "Quantifying invariant features of within-group inequality in consumption across groups," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 13(3), pages 469-490, October.
    11. Tomson Ogwang, 2011. "Power laws in top wealth distributions: evidence from Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 473-486, October.
    12. Kyung Serk Cho & Hon Keung Tony Ng, 2021. "Tolerance intervals in statistical software and robustness under model misspecification," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-49, December.
    13. Ogwang, Tomson, 2013. "Is the wealth of the world’s billionaires Paretian?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(4), pages 757-762.
    14. Fabio Clementi & Mauro Gallegati, 2005. "Pareto's Law of Income Distribution: Evidence for Grermany, the United Kingdom, and the United States," Microeconomics 0505006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. James Stamey & Dean Young & Tom Bratcher, 2006. "Bayesian sample-size determination for one and two Poisson rate parameters with applications to quality control," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 583-594.
    16. Ghosh, Dipak & Chakraborty, Sayantan & Samanta, Shukla, 2019. "Study of translational effect in Tagore’s Gitanjali using Chaos based Multifractal analysis technique," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1343-1354.
    17. J. R. Iglesias & R. M. C. de Almeida, 2011. "Entropy and equilibrium state of free market models," Papers 1108.5725, arXiv.org.
    18. Rotundo, Giulia, 2014. "Black–Scholes–Schrödinger–Zipf–Mandelbrot model framework for improving a study of the coauthor core score," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 296-301.
    19. Arnab Chatterjee & Bikas K Chakrabarti, 2005. "Ideal-Gas Like Markets: Effect of Savings," Papers physics/0507136, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2005.
    20. Chakrabarti, Anindya S. & Chakrabarti, Bikas K., 2010. "Statistical theories of income and wealth distribution," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 4, pages 1-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:392:y:2013:i:7:p:1702-1711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.