Very weakly dominant strategies
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.09.005
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Shengwu Li, 2017.
"Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(11), pages 3257-3287, November.
- Li, Shengwu, 2017. "Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms," MPRA Paper 78930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Fey, Mark, 2012. "Symmetric games with only asymmetric equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 424-427.
- Rachmilevitch, Shiran, 2020. "An implementation of the Nash bargaining solution by iterated strict dominance," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
- Karagözoğlu, Emin & Keskin, Kerim & Sağlam, Çağrı, 2013. "A minimally altruistic refinement of Nash equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 422-430.
- Nejat Anbarci, 2001. "Divide-the-Dollar Game Revisited," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 295-303, June.
- Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2023. "Symmetric games with only asymmetric equilibria: examples with continuous payoff functions," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 11(1), pages 65-68, April.
- Emin Karagözoğlu & Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2018. "Implementing egalitarianism in a class of Nash demand games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 495-508, October.
- Kalai, Adam Tauman & Kalai, Ehud, 2024. "Beyond dominance and Nash: Ranking equilibria by critical mass," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 378-394.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2022. "Reasonable Nash demand games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 319-330, September.
- Atakan Dizarlar & Emin Karagözoğlu, 2023. "Kantian equilibria of a class of Nash bargaining games," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(4), pages 867-891, August.
- Emin Karagözoğlu & Kerim Keskin & Çağrı Sağlam, 2023. "(In)efficiency and equitability of equilibrium outcomes in a family of bargaining games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 175-193, March.
- William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
- Pablo Guillen & Róbert F. Veszteg, 2021.
"Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 650-668, June.
- Pablo Guillen & Róbert F. Veszteg, 2019. "Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets," Working Papers 1913, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
- Josué Ortega & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2022.
"Obvious manipulations in cake-cutting,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(4), pages 969-988, November.
- Josue Ortega & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2019. "Obvious Manipulations in Cake-Cutting," Papers 1908.02988, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
- Ortega, Josué & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2019. "Obvious manipulations in cake-cutting," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-056, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Ortega, Josué & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2020. "Obvious Manipulations in Cake-Cutting," QBS Working Paper Series 2020/04, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
- Markus Möller, 2024. "Transparent Matching Mechanisms," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 306, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Takashi Kamihigashi & Kerim Keskin & Çağrı Sağlam, 2021.
"Organizational refinements of Nash equilibrium,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 289-312, October.
- Takashi Kamihigashi & Kerim Keskin & Çağrı Sağlam, 2017. "Organizational Refinements of Nash Equilibrium," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-25, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2019.
"Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 423-447.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2015. "Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions," MPRA Paper 62052, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2016. "Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions," MPRA Paper 68981, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2015. "Knowing me, imagining you: Projection and overbidding in auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113160, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Tilman Börgers & Jiangtao Li, 2019.
"Strategically Simple Mechanisms,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 2003-2035, November.
- Tilman Borgers & Jiangtao Li, 2018. "Strategically Simple Mechanisms," Papers 1812.00849, arXiv.org.
- Tilman Borgers & Jiangtao Li, 2018. "Strategically Simple Mechanisms," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2148, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Tilman Börgers & Jiangtao Li, 2018. "Strategically Simple Mechanisms," CESifo Working Paper Series 6844, CESifo.
- Thomas Kourouxous & Thomas Bauer, 2019. "Violations of dominance in decision-making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 209-239, April.
- Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Flip Klijn & Marc Vorsatz, 2023.
"Constrained school choice: an experimental QRE analysis,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 587-624, October.
- Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Marc Vorsatz & Flip Klijn, 2021. "Constrained School Choice: An Experimental QRE Analysis," Working Papers 1270, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Philippe Jehiel & Konrad Mierendorff, 2021.
"Auction Design with Data-Driven Misspecifications,"
Papers
2107.00640, arXiv.org.
- Philippe Jehiel & Konrad Mierendorff, 2022. "Auction Design with Data-Driven Misspecifications," PSE Working Papers halshs-03735747, HAL.
- Philippe Jehiel & Konrad Mierendorff, 2022. "Auction Design with Data-Driven Misspecifications," Working Papers halshs-03735747, HAL.
- Andrew Komo & Scott Duke Kominers & Tim Roughgarden, 2024. "Shill-Proof Auctions," Papers 2404.00475, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
- Sander Onderstal & Yang Yang, 2020. "Cheap-talk Communication in Procurement Auctions: Theory and Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-013/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
- Guillen, Pablo & Kesten, Onur & Kiefer, Alexander & Melatos, Mark, 2020. "A Field Evaluation of a Matching Mechanism: University Applicant Behaviour in Australia," Working Papers 2020-15, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
- Chen, Yan & Kesten, Onur, 2019. "Chinese college admissions and school choice reforms: An experimental study," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 83-100.
- Ryuji Sano, 2021. "Dynamic communication mechanism design," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 163-180, July.
- Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018.
"How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances,"
Working Papers
2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
- Canavari, Maurizio & Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo, 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," MPRA Paper 89715, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Burguet, Roberto & Sákovics, József, 2019.
"Personalized prices and uncertainty in monopsony,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
- Roberto Burguet & József Sákovics, 2019. "Personalized prices and uncertainty in monopsony," Working Papers 2019-01, University of Central Florida, Department of Economics.
- Roberto Burguet & Jozsef Sakovics, 2019. "Personalized Prices and Uncertainty in Monopsony," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 290, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
More about this item
Keywords
Dominant strategies; Solution concepts;Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:132:y:2024:i:c:p:75-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.