IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v120y2016icp91-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bootstrap prediction in univariate volatility models with leverage effect

Author

Listed:
  • Trucíos, Carlos
  • Hotta, Luiz K.

Abstract

The EGARCH and GJR-GARCH models are widely used in modeling volatility when a leverage effect is present in the data. Traditional methods of constructing prediction intervals for time series normally assume that the model parameters are known, and the innovations are normally distributed. When these assumptions are not true, the prediction interval obtained usually has the wrong coverage. In this article, the Pascual, Romo and Ruiz (PRR) algorithm, developed to obtain prediction intervals for GARCH models, is adapted to obtain prediction intervals of returns and volatilities in EGARCH and GJR-GARCH models. These adjustments have the same advantage of the original PRR algorithm, which incorporates a component of uncertainty due to parameter estimation and does not require assumptions about the distribution of the innovations. The adaptations show good performance in Monte Carlo experiments. However, the performance, especially in volatility prediction, can be very poor in the presence of an additive outlier near the forecasting origin. The algorithms are applied to the daily returns series of the GBP/USD exchange rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Trucíos, Carlos & Hotta, Luiz K., 2016. "Bootstrap prediction in univariate volatility models with leverage effect," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 91-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:120:y:2016:i:c:p:91-103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2015.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475415001330
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2015.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bei Chen & Yulia R. Gel & N. Balakrishna & Bovas Abraham, 2011. "Computationally efficient bootstrap prediction intervals for returns and volatilities in ARCH and GARCH processes," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 51-71, January.
    2. Andersen, Torben G. & Dobrev, Dobrislav & Schaumburg, Ernst, 2012. "Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 75-93.
    3. Carnero, M. Angeles & Peña, Daniel & Ruiz, Esther, 2012. "Estimating GARCH volatility in the presence of outliers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 86-90.
    4. Pascual, Lorenzo & Romo, Juan & Ruiz, Esther, 2005. "Bootstrap prediction intervals for power-transformed time series," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 219-235.
    5. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    6. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    7. Lorenzo Pascual & Juan Romo & Esther Ruiz, 2004. "Bootstrap predictive inference for ARIMA processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 449-465, July.
    8. Reeves, Jonathan J., 2005. "Bootstrap prediction intervals for ARCH models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 237-248.
    9. Lutz Kilian, 1998. "Accounting for Lag Order Uncertainty in Autoregressions: the Endogenous Lag Order Bootstrap Algorithm," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(5), pages 531-548, September.
    10. Jesús Miguel & Pilar Olave, 1999. "Bootstrapping forecast intervals in ARCH models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 8(2), pages 345-364, December.
    11. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    12. Pascual, Lorenzo & Romo, Juan & Ruiz, Esther, 2006. "Bootstrap prediction for returns and volatilities in GARCH models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(9), pages 2293-2312, May.
    13. Hotta, Luiz & Trucíos, Carlos & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2015. "Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH models: returns, volatilities and value-at-risk," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws1523, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hotta, Luiz & Trucíos, Carlos & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2015. "Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH models: returns, volatilities and value-at-risk," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws1523, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    2. Mahsa Gorji & Rasoul Sajjad, 2017. "Improving Value-at-Risk Estimation from the Normal EGARCH Model," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(1), March.
    3. Carlos Trucíos & James W. Taylor, 2023. "A comparison of methods for forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall of cryptocurrencies," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 989-1007, July.
    4. Trucíos, Carlos, 2019. "Forecasting Bitcoin risk measures: A robust approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 836-847.
    5. Trucíos, Carlos & Hotta, Luiz K. & Valls Pereira, Pedro L., 2019. "On the robustness of the principal volatility components," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-219.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trucíos, Carlos, 2019. "Forecasting Bitcoin risk measures: A robust approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 836-847.
    2. Beste Hamiye Beyaztas & Ufuk Beyaztas & Soutir Bandyopadhyay & Wei-Min Huang, 2018. "New and Fast Block Bootstrap-Based Prediction Intervals for GARCH(1,1) Process with Application to Exchange Rates," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 168-194, February.
    3. Ufuk Beyaztas & Beste H. Beyaztas, 2019. "On Jackknife-After-Bootstrap Method for Dependent Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 1613-1632, April.
    4. Meriem Rjiba & Michail Tsagris & Hedi Mhalla, 2015. "Bootstrap for Value at Risk Prediction," International Journal of Empirical Finance, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 4(6), pages 362-371.
    5. Deniz Erdemlioglu & Sébastien Laurent & Christopher J. Neely, 2013. "Econometric modeling of exchange rate volatility and jumps," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 16, pages 373-427, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. T. -N. Nguyen & M. -N. Tran & R. Kohn, 2020. "Recurrent Conditional Heteroskedasticity," Papers 2010.13061, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    7. Štefan Lyócsa & Roman Horváth, 2018. "Stock Market Contagion: a New Approach," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 547-577, July.
    8. Nieto, María Rosa & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2008. "Measuring financial risk : comparison of alternative procedures to estimate VaR and ES," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws087326, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Qu, Hui & Duan, Qingling & Niu, Mengyi, 2018. "Modeling the volatility of realized volatility to improve volatility forecasts in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 767-776.
    10. João Henrique G. Mazzeu & Gloria González-Rivera & Esther Ruiz & Helena Veiga, 2020. "A bootstrap approach for generalized Autocontour testing Implications for VIX forecast densities," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 971-990, November.
    11. Andersen, Torben G. & Bollerslev, Tim & Christoffersen, Peter F. & Diebold, Francis X., 2013. "Financial Risk Measurement for Financial Risk Management," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1127-1220, Elsevier.
    12. Fresoli, Diego & Ruiz, Esther & Pascual, Lorenzo, 2015. "Bootstrap multi-step forecasts of non-Gaussian VAR models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 834-848.
    13. Goulas, Lambros & Skiadopoulos, George, 2012. "Are freight futures markets efficient? Evidence from IMAREX," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 644-659.
    14. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2017. "Forecasting crude-oil market volatility: Further evidence with jumps," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 508-519.
    15. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné, 2019. "The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 157, pages 179-202.
    16. Hotta, Luiz & Trucíos, Carlos & Ruiz Ortega, Esther, 2015. "Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH models: returns, volatilities and value-at-risk," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws1523, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    17. Cristina Chinazzo & Vahidin Jeleskovic, 2024. "Forecasting Bitcoin Volatility: A Comparative Analysis of Volatility Approaches," Papers 2401.02049, arXiv.org.
    18. Piotr Fiszeder & Grzegorz Perczak, 2013. "A new look at variance estimation based on low, high and closing prices taking into account the drift," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 456-481, November.
    19. Trong‐Nghia Nguyen & Minh‐Ngoc Tran & Robert Kohn, 2022. "Recurrent conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 1031-1054, August.
    20. Mahsa Gorji & Rasoul Sajjad, 2017. "Improving Value-at-Risk Estimation from the Normal EGARCH Model," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:120:y:2016:i:c:p:91-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.