IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v51y2015icp452-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum economic yield of the western rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after moving from effort to quota control

Author

Listed:
  • Caputi, Nick
  • de Lestang, Simon
  • Reid, Chris
  • Hesp, Alex
  • How, Jason

Abstract

The western rock lobster (Panulirus cygnus) fishery is Australia’s most valuable single-species fishery, worth AUD$200–$400 million annually. Stock assessment for this fishery utilises the puerulus settlement to predict recruitment to the fishery 3–4 years later. This predictive ability has been particularly useful recently, due to an unprecedented period of low settlement between 2006/07 and 2012/13. Pre-emptive management action (~70% effort reduction) was taken to provide greater protection to the breeding stock which also moved the fishery to the maximum economic yield (MEY) level of effort for the projected recruitment. In 2010/11, the fishery moved from an effort-controlled to a quota-controlled fishery, which led to changes in fishing practices resulting in reductions in fishing costs and increases in lobster prices of about US$16/kg. This provided a unique opportunity to compare an MEY assessment under effort and quota controls. The MEY assessment under quota controls for a 5-year period indicated that annual harvest rates of 37–47% of legal biomass will achieve catches of 5780–7370t. in 2014. This MEY target harvest range, which complements existing sustainability reference points based on egg production, is robust to a range of costs, prices and profit discount rates. This catch range enables industry/managers to take into account marketing implications and social issues (e.g. employment) in quota setting and therefore could be considered a socio-economic target. The MEY level of fishing has increased egg production to well above threshold levels that were based on maximum sustainable yield, providing the fishery with increased resilience when faced with environmental perturbations. This enables consideration for relaxing some existing biological controls, e.g. setose (mature) females, females above a maximum size, and lobsters 76–77mm carapace length. The relaxation of these controls is estimated to increase profits by about AUD$15 million annually due to higher catch rates and reduced fishing effort while maintaining egg production well above threshold levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Caputi, Nick & de Lestang, Simon & Reid, Chris & Hesp, Alex & How, Jason, 2015. "Maximum economic yield of the western rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after moving from effort to quota control," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 452-464.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:452-464
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14002681
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grafton, R. Quentin & Kompas, Tom & Chu, Long & Che, Nhu, 2010. "Maximum economic yield," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 1-8.
    2. Kompas, Tom & Dichmont, Cathy M. & Punt, Andre E. & Deng, A. & Che, Tuong Nhu & Bishop, Janet & Gooday, Peter & Ye, Yemin & Zhou, S., 2010. "Maximizing profits and conserving stocks in the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 1-19.
    3. Norman-López, Ana & Pascoe, Sean, 2011. "Net economic effects of achieving maximum economic yield in fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 489-495, July.
    4. Reid, Chris & Caputi, Nick & de Lestang, Simon & Stephenson, Peter, 2013. "Assessing the effects of moving to maximum economic yield effort level in the western rock lobster fishery of Western Australia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 303-313.
    5. Hilborn, Ray, 2007. "Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 153-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamazaki, Satoshi & Jennings, Sarah & Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom, 2015. "Are marine reserves and harvest control rules substitutes or complements for rebuilding fisheries?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Diop, Bassirou & Sanz, Nicolas & Duplan, Yves Jamont Junior & Guene, El Hadji Mama & Blanchard, Fabian & Pereau, Jean-Christophe & Doyen, Luc, 2018. "Maximum Economic Yield Fishery Management in the Face of Global Warming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 52-61.
    3. Thanh Viet Nguyen, 2011. "Sustainable Management of Shrimp Trawl Fishery in Tonkin Gulf, Vietnam," Applied Economics Journal, Kasetsart University, Faculty of Economics, Center for Applied Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 65-81, December.
    4. Da Rocha, José María & Gutiérrez Huerta, María José & Taboada Antelo, Luis, 2011. "Pulse vs. Optimal Stationary Fishing: The Northern Stock of Hake," DFAEII Working Papers 1988-088X, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II.
    5. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas, 2014. "Three Pillars of Fisheries Policy," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 609-614, September.
    6. Pascoe, Sean & Hutton, Trevor & Hoshino, Eriko, 2018. "Offsetting Externalities in Estimating MEY in Multispecies Fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 304-311.
    7. Violaine Tarizzo & Eric Tromeur & Olivier Thébaud & Richard Little & Sarah Jennings & Luc Doyen, 2018. "Risk averse policies foster bio-economic sustainability in mixed fisheries," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-07, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    8. Long Chu & Tom Kompas, 2014. "Targets and Fisheries Management in the Asia and Pacific Region," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 615-622, September.
    9. Da Rocha, José María & Gutiérrez Huerta, María José & Cerviño, Santiago, 2012. "Reference Points Based on Dynamic Optimisation: A Versatil Algorithm for Mixed Fishery Management with Bio-economic Agestructured Models," DFAEII Working Papers 1988-088X, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II.
    10. Dennis, Darren & Plagányi, Éva & Van Putten, Ingrid & Hutton, Trevor & Pascoe, Sean, 2015. "Cost benefit of fishery-independent surveys: Are they worth the money?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 108-115.
    11. Stefano Mainardi, 2021. "Parametric and Semiparametric Efficiency Frontiers in Fishery Analysis: Overview and Case Study on the Falkland Islands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 169-210, June.
    12. Alonso Roldán, Virginia & Villasante, Sebastian & Outeiro, Luis, 2015. "Linking marine and terrestrial ecosystem services through governance social networks analysis in Central Patagonia (Argentina)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 390-402.
    13. Tromeur, Eric & Doyen, Luc & Tarizzo, Violaine & Little, L. Richard & Jennings, Sarah & Thébaud, Olivier, 2021. "Risk averse policies foster bio-economic sustainability in mixed fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Nichols, Rachel & Yamazaki, Satoshi & Jennings, Sarah, 2018. "The Role of Precaution in Stock Recovery Plans in a Fishery with Habitat Effect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 359-369.
    15. Parés, Claudio & Dresdner, Jorge & Salgado, Hugo, 2015. "Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 36-43.
    16. Basak Bayramoglu & Brian Copeland & Jean-François Jacques, 2018. "Trade and fisheries subsidies [Le commerce international et les subventions à la pêche]," Post-Print hal-02624649, HAL.
    17. Zachary D Hughes & Eli P Fenichel & Leah R Gerber, 2011. "The Potential Impact of Labor Choices on the Efficacy of Marine Conservation Strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-10, August.
    18. Egoh, Benis N. & O'Farrell, Patrick J. & Charef, Aymen & Josephine Gurney, Leigh & Koellner, Thomas & Nibam Abi, Henry & Egoh, Mody & Willemen, Louise, 2012. "An African account of ecosystem service provision: Use, threats and policy options for sustainable livelihoods," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 71-81.
    19. Jules Selles, 2018. "Fisheries management: what uncertainties matter?," Working Papers hal-01824238, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:452-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.