IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837719320113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paths of urban planning in a post-mining area. A case study of a former sandpit in southern Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztofik, Robert
  • Dulias, Renata
  • Kantor-Pietraga, Iwona
  • Spórna, Tomasz
  • Dragan, Weronika

Abstract

Decision-making on the directions of spatial development are particularly visible in post-mining areas in large cities. This issue is one of the key themes in a discourse that focuses on how to reconcile strategic urban planning and urban policy in post-mining towns, and is based on the concepts of brownfield regeneration and just transition. This paper approaches the issue by taking the redevelopment of the site of a large former stowing sand pit, operated for the needs of coal mining in Sosnowiec near Krakow (southern Poland), as an example. The dilemma concerns turning the former mining area into a new zone for industrial investment or transforming it into a leisure area around a new reservoir. An important part of the study involved obtaining, via a questionnaire survey, the opinions of residents as to their vision for how the former sandpit should be redeveloped. The paper underlines that due to limited social participation in this regard, this is a challenging issue for local urban policy. In post-mining towns, in which sustainable development is particularly important, the changeability of socio-economic phenomena on the one hand and residents' opinions on the other merit special attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztofik, Robert & Dulias, Renata & Kantor-Pietraga, Iwona & Spórna, Tomasz & Dragan, Weronika, 2020. "Paths of urban planning in a post-mining area. A case study of a former sandpit in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719320113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719320113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliveira, Eduardo & Hersperger, Anna M., 2018. "Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 623-633.
    2. Unruh, Gregory C., 2002. "Escaping carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 317-325, March.
    3. Barbier, Edward B., 2014. "The challenges for environment and development economics," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 287-290, June.
    4. Robert Krzysztofik & Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Tomasz Spórna & Weronika Dragan & Valentin Mihaylov, 2019. "Beyond ‘logistics sprawl’ and ‘logistics anti-sprawl’. Case of the Katowice region, Poland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 1646-1660, August.
    5. Guy Baeten & Erik Swyngedouw & Louis Albrechts, 1999. "Politics, Institutions and Regional Restructuring Processes: From Managed Growth to Planned Fragmentation in the Reconversion of Belgium's Last Coal Mining Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 247-258.
    6. Campbell, Gary & Roberts, Mark, 2010. "Permitting a new mine: Insights from the community debate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 210-217, September.
    7. Louis Albrechts, 2006. "Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(6), pages 1149-1170, June.
    8. Xunmin Ou & Zhiyi Yuan & Tianduo Peng & Zhenqing Sun & Sheng Zhou, 2017. "The Low-Carbon Transition toward Sustainability of Regional Coal-Dominated Energy Consumption Structure: A Case of Hebei Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Hilson, Gavin & Murck, Barbara, 2000. "Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 227-238, December.
    10. Dieter Rink & Chris Couch & Annegret Haase & Robert Krzysztofik & Bogdan Nadolu & Petr Rumpel, 2014. "The governance of urban shrinkage in cities of post-socialist Europe: policies, strategies and actors," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 258-277, September.
    11. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    12. Kacper Szulecki & Severin Fischer & Anne Therese Gullberg & Oliver Sartor, 2016. "Shaping the ‘Energy Union': between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 548-567, July.
    13. Farah Mneimneh & Issam Srour & Isam Kaysi & Mona Harb, 2017. "Eco-City Projects: Incorporating Sustainability Requirements during Pre-Project Planning," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 47-74, January.
    14. McCauley, Darren & Heffron, Raphael, 2018. "Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-7.
    15. Karel Prach & Kl�ra Řehounkov� & Jiř� Řehounek & Petra Konvalinkov�, 2011. "Ecological Restoration of Central European Mining Sites: A Summary of a Multi-site Analysis," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 263-268, April.
    16. Julia Bachtrögler & Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2020. "The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 21-34, January.
    17. Navratil, Josef & Picha, Kamil & Martinat, Stanislav & Nathanail, Paul C. & Tureckova, Kamila & Holesinska, Andrea, 2018. "Resident’s preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 224-234.
    18. Sílvia Sousa & Paulo Pinho, 2015. "Planning for Shrinkage: Paradox or Paradigm," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 12-32, January.
    19. Xiaohui Hu & Robert Hassink, 2017. "Exploring adaptation and adaptability in uneven economic resilience: a tale of two Chinese mining regions," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 527-541.
    20. Maarten Wolsink & Jeroen Devilee, 2009. "The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners' perspective to fairness and community commitment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 217-236.
    21. Eujin Julia Kim & Patrick Miller, 2017. "Residents' perception of local brownfields in rail corridor area in the City of Roanoke: the effect of people's preconception and health concerns factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(5), pages 862-882, May.
    22. Eduardo Oliveira & Silvia Tobias & Anna M. Hersperger, 2018. "Can Strategic Spatial Planning Contribute to Land Degradation Reduction in Urban Regions? State of the Art and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
    23. Yizhou Wu & Peilei Fan & Bo Li & Zutao Ouyang & Yong Liu & Heyuan You, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Planning Control on Urban Growth: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maksymilian Solarski & Robert Krzysztofik, 2021. "Is the Naturalization of the Townscape a Condition of De-Industrialization? An Example of Bytom in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2022. "The Economic Situation of Polish Cities in Post-Mining Regions. Long-Term Analysis on the Example of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Robert Krzysztofik & Oimahmad Rahmonov & Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Weronika Dragan, 2022. "The Perception of Urban Forests in Post-Mining Areas: A Case Study of Sosnowiec-Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Marian Łupieżowiec & Jarosław Rybak & Zenon Różański & Przemysław Dobrzycki & Witold Jędrzejczyk, 2022. "Design and Construction of Foundations for Industrial Facilities in the Areas of Former Post-Mining Waste Dumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Karolina Dmochowska-Dudek & Marcin Wójcik, 2022. "Socio-Economic Resilience of Poland’s Lignite Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Dagmara Adamkiewicz & Bartłomiej Szewczyk & Olga Kania, 2022. "Decision-Making Support for Housing Projects in Post-Industrial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Eduardo Oliveira & Silvia Tobias & Anna M. Hersperger, 2018. "Can Strategic Spatial Planning Contribute to Land Degradation Reduction in Urban Regions? State of the Art and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Daunt, Ana Beatriz Pierri & Inostroza, Luis & Hersperger, Anna M., 2021. "The role of spatial planning in land change: An assessment of urban planning and nature conservation efficiency at the southeastern coast of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga, 2021. "Does One Decade of Urban Policy for the Shrinking City Make Visible Progress in Urban Re-Urbanization? A Case Study of Bytom, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Aklin, Michaël, 2021. "Do high electricity bills undermine public support for renewables? Evidence from the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Kowalska, Izabela Jonek, 2014. "Risk management in the hard coal mining industry: Social and environmental aspects of collieries’ liquidation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 124-134.
    8. Ondřej Slach & Vojtěch Bosák & Luděk Krtička & Alexandr Nováček & Petr Rumpel, 2019. "Urban Shrinkage and Sustainability: Assessing the Nexus between Population Density, Urban Structures and Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Wolsink, Maarten, 2012. "Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 83-87.
    10. Gianluca Egidi & Ilaria Zambon & Ilaria Tombolin & Luca Salvati & Sirio Cividino & Samaneh Seifollahi-Aghmiuni & Zahra Kalantari, 2020. "Unraveling Latent Aspects of Urban Expansion: Desertification Risk Reveals More," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Ahmad, Naveed & Zhu, Yuming & Ullah, Zia & Iqbal, Muzaffar & Hussain, Kramat & Ahmed, Rahil Irfan, 2021. "Sustainable solutions to facilitate brownfield redevelopment projects in emerging countries – Pakistani scenario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Aleksandra Zdyrko & Jakub Bednarczyk, 2021. "Semi-Natural Areas on Post-Mining Brownfields as an Opportunity to Strengthen the Attractiveness of a Small Town. An Example of Radzionków in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    14. McCauley, Darren & Pettigrew, Kerry, 2023. "Building a just transition in asia-pacific: Four strategies for reducing fossil fuel dependence and investing in clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. John A. Mathews, 2020. "Schumpeterian economic dynamics of greening: propagation of green eco-platforms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 929-948, September.
    16. Lyhne, Ivar & Aaen, Sara Bjørn & Nielsen, Helle & Kørnøv, Lone & Larsen, Sanne Vammen, 2018. "Citizens’ self-mobilization, motivational factors, and the group of most engaged citizens: The case of a radioactive waste repository in Denmark," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 433-442.
    17. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    20. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719320113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.