IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v95y2020ics026483771932037x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criteria model for land valuation in the land consolidation

Author

Listed:
  • Tezcan, Ahmet
  • Büyüktaş, Kenan
  • Akkaya Aslan, Şerife Tülin

Abstract

Land consolidation is an effective technique in land management that contributes to sustainable rural development. Land valuation is one of the most important steps in land consolidation because it plays an important role in the reallocation process. Land valuation is also an important problem in Turkey as in many countries in the world. Because the lands will be reallocated at the end of the consolidation process, it is very important to determine the precise value of each parcel. However, the methods used in land valuation in many countries lag behind current techniques and technologies. For this reason, a new method for land valuation is needed. The purpose of this study was to develop a new model based on multi-criteria calculations that is suitable for today's technologies and addresses the weakness in the current land valuation methods. In a case study of Solak, Antalya, Turkey, we identified fourteen key land value factors. Those factors were assigned weights by the Land Valuation Committee, academic staff, engineers, and local landowners. The weights were then integrated into a framework called the Land Quality Index. The land quality index factors are the criteria for evaluating the geographical, physical, and socio-economic structure of the region. The scores for each factor on each parcel were determined using GIS software. The total score of fourteen factors was then converted to a 100-point scale, that comprised the Land Quality Index. The land value of each parcel was determined by adding the soil index to the Land Quality Index. In our study, we also created three different models to investigate how the parameters were apportioned during the land valuation. We found that, while the current method used by the government agency (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works) classified the lands into five groups, our methods classified the lands into 17, 20, 24 groups, respectively. In addition, while the deduction rate was 4.97 % in the current method, they were 4.89 %, 4.86 % and 4.85 % in our new models, respectively. The method we proposed in this study determined land values more accurately, precisely, and fairly compared to current method used by General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works. It is suggested that our models could be used instead of the current method in the land consolidation works in Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Tezcan, Ahmet & Büyüktaş, Kenan & Akkaya Aslan, Şerife Tülin, 2020. "A multi-criteria model for land valuation in the land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:95:y:2020:i:c:s026483771932037x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771932037X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choumert, Johanna & Phélinas, Pascale, 2015. "Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 134-140.
    2. Demetriou, Demetris, 2018. "Automating the land valuation process carried out in land consolidation schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 21-32.
    3. Coruhlu, Yakup Emre & Yildiz, Okan, 2017. "Geographical database for object-oriented land division modelling in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 212-221.
    4. Shoemaker, Robbin, 1990. "How Technological Progress and Government Programs Influence Agricultural Land Values," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309521, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Glumac, Brano & Herrera-Gomez, Marcos & Licheron, Julien, 2019. "A hedonic urban land price index," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 802-812.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2022. "Towards a full automation of land consolidation projects: Fast land partitioning algorithm using the land value map," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Ertunç, Ela & Karkınlı, Ahmet Emin & Bozdağ, Aslı, 2021. "A clustering-based approach to land valuation in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Josef Slaboch & Michal Malý, 2022. "Approaches towards Land Valuation and Land Pricing under the Influence of Geo-Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Chen, Hang & Meng, Fei & Yu, Zhenning & Tan, Yongzhong, 2022. "Spatial–temporal characteristics and influencing factors of farmland expansion in different agricultural regions of Heilongjiang Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Ela Ertunç, 2023. "The Effect of Land Consolidation Projects on Carbon Footprint," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Ezequiel Lote & Fernando Oliveira Tavares, 2023. "Influential Factors in the Evaluation of Agricultural Lands in the Huambo Province, Angola," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ertunç, Ela & Karkınlı, Ahmet Emin & Bozdağ, Aslı, 2021. "A clustering-based approach to land valuation in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    4. Shaik, Saleem & Atwood, Joseph A. & Helmers, Glenn A., 2012. "Did 1933 new deal legislation contribute to farm real estate values: A regional analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 801-816.
    5. Kazak Jan K. & Hendricks Andreas & Simeunović Nataša, 2019. "Hidden Public Value Identification of Real Estate Management Decisions," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 96-104, December.
    6. Johanna CHOUMERT & Pascale PHELINAS, 2015. "Farmland Rental Values in GM Soybean Areas of Argentina: Do Contractual Arrangements Matter?," Working Papers 201532, CERDI.
    7. Mariusz Dacko & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Jacek Pijanowski & Jarosław Taszakowski & Aneta Dacko & Jarosław Janus, 2021. "Increase in the Value of Agricultural Parcels—Modelling and Simulation of the Effects of Land Consolidation Project," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2019. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size," FORLand Working Papers 08 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    9. Yu-Hui Chen & Chun-Lin Lee & Guan-Rui Chen & Chiung-Hsin Wang & Ya-Hui Chen, 2018. "Factors Causing Farmland Price-Value Distortion and Their Implications for Peri-Urban Growth Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Marcelo Caffera & Felipe Vásquez & Daniel Rodríguez & Leonidas Carrasco-Letelier & José Ignacio Hernández & Mariela Buonomo, 2019. "Spatial Spillovers in the Implicit Market Price of Soil Erosion: An Estimation using a Spatio-temporal Hedonic Model," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1909, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    11. Asad Aziz & Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Hussein Almohamad & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Motrih Al-Mutiry, 2023. "Proximity to Neighborhood Services and Property Values in Urban Area: An Evaluation through the Hedonic Pricing Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Elena Bykowa & Maria Hełdak & Julia Sishchuk, 2020. "Cadastral Land Value Modelling Based on Zoning by Prestige: A Case Study of a Resort Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Glumac, Brano & Herrera-Gomez, Marcos & Licheron, Julien, 2019. "A hedonic urban land price index," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 802-812.
    14. Virginia, Aparicio & Zamora, Martín & Barbera, Agustín & Castro-Franco, Mauricio & Domenech, Marisa & De Gerónimo, Eduardo & Costa, José Luis, 2018. "Industrial agriculture and agroecological transition systems: A comparative analysis of productivity results, organic matter and glyphosate in soil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 103-112.
    15. Denbaly, Mark & Vroomen, Harry, 1991. "Elasticities of Fertilizer Demands for Corn in the Short and the Long Run: A Cointegrated and Error-Correcting System," Staff Reports 278575, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. François Koulischer & Pauline Perray & Thi Thu Huyen Tran, 2022. "COVID-19 and the Mortgage Market in Luxembourg," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Marija Opačak & Erda Wang, 2019. "Estimating Willingness to Pay for a Future Recreational Park Atop the Current Jakuševec Landfill in Zagreb, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Zeng, Zhongping & Li, Siqi & Lian, Jiunn-Woei & Li, Jiang & Chen, Tao & Li, Yujia, 2021. "Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Sen Chakraborty, Kritika & Chakraborty, Avinandan & Berrens, Robert P., 2023. "Valuing soil erosion control investments in Nigerian agricultural lands: A hedonic pricing model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Ayala Wineman & Thomas S Jayne, 2018. "Land Prices Heading Skyward? An Analysis of Farmland Values across Tanzania," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 187-214.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:95:y:2020:i:c:s026483771932037x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.