IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v83y2019icp105-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A network-based approach for landscape integration of traditional settlements: A case study in the Wuling Mountain area, southwestern China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Guo
  • Hu, Wenmin

Abstract

A trans-regional landscape network of traditional settlements (LNTS) can be used to integrate scattered landscapes and ensure the unified protection of natural and cultural landscapes. The LNTS is superior to traditional settlement protection in local areas, which is not conducive to maintaining the integrity and order of traditional settlement landscapes at the regional level. The main purpose of this research was to construct the LNTS, and three main steps were involved: the selection of the traditional settlements, the restoration of the connectivity of cultural routes, and the identification of the landscape areas. The landscape areas were identified based on the spatial coupling of the landscape character areas and the core areas of traditional settlement cultural diffusion. The landscape character areas were determined based on the identification of landscape characteristics, while the core areas of traditional settlement cultural diffusion were calculated by the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model. The LNTS could support the overall protection of the traditional settlement landscapes, enhance the cultural, ecological, tourism and educational values, and promote the cross-regional coordination and cooperation among different management and protection departments. Finally, the LNTS was conducive to protecting the virtuous cycle of traditional settlement protection and regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Guo & Hu, Wenmin, 2019. "A network-based approach for landscape integration of traditional settlements: A case study in the Wuling Mountain area, southwestern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 105-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:83:y:2019:i:c:p:105-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771831562X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Jeanette Snowball & Sinead Courtney, 2010. "Cultural heritage routes in South Africa: Effective tools for heritage conservation and local economic development?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 563-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingyu Zhang & Chenying Shen & Weicheng Gu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2023. "Identification of Traditional Village Aggregation Areas from the Perspective of Historic Layering: Evidence from Hilly Regions in Zhejiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Huanhuan Hua & Amare Wondirad, 2020. "Tourism Network in Urban Agglomerated Destinations: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Destination Development through a Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Denis Dirin & Elena Rasputina & Maria Kuklina & Natalia Krasnoshtanova & Andrey Trufanov & Eduard Batosirenov & Galina Lysanova, 2023. "Potential for Tourism and Recreation in the Todzhinsky Kozhuun (District), Republic of Tyva, RF," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Daimou Wei & Zhexiao Wang & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Traditional Village Landscape Integration Based on Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of the Yuan River Basin in South-Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Juan Xu & Mengsheng Yang & Ziliang Lu & Dan Liu & Yan Wu, 2021. "Quality Analysis on Spatial Planning Pattern of Rural Area in Southern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Zizhen Hong & Wentao Cao & Ying Chen & Sijia Zhu & Wenjun Zheng, 2024. "Identifying Rural Landscape Heritage Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Li River Basin in Guilin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Jieyong Wang & Yu Zhang, 2021. "Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Settlement Pattern and Its Influencing Factors in China from 1995 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Yuchun Xiao & Shuiliang Liu & Jinyou Zuo & Ningling Yin & Jilin Wu & Wenhai Xie, 2022. "Farmer Households’ Livelihood Resilience in Ethnic Tourism Villages: A Case Study of the Wuling Mountain Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Yulian Pan & Yunong Wu & Xi Xu & Bin Zhang & Weifu Li, 2022. "Identifying Terrestrial Landscape Character Types in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rogerson Christian M., 2014. "Rethinking slum tourism: tourism in South Africa’s rural slumlands," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(26), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Stoffelen, Arie, 2018. "Tourism trails as tools for cross-border integration: A best practice case study of the Vennbahn cycling route," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 91-102.
    4. Liu Yang & Mengmeng Suo & Shunqian Gao & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Aihui Jiang & Jun Cai & Fulong Chen & Baolei Zhang & Zhiwei Wang & Qiaoyun Xie & Sisi Yu, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Ren Yang & Baoqing Qin & Yuancheng Lin, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Land Use Change on Spatial Differentiation of Landscape and Ecosystem Service Values in the Case of Study the Pearl River Delta in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Guanglong Dong & Zhonghao Liu & Yuanzhao Niu & Wenya Jiang, 2022. "Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Jing Xie & Binggeng Xie & Kaichun Zhou & Junhan Li & Jianyong Xiao & Changchang Liu & Xuemao Zhang, 2023. "Multiple Probability Ecological Network and County-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Pingxing Li & Jinlong Gao & Jianglong Chen, 2020. "Quantitative assessment of ecological stress of construction lands by quantity and location: case study in Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1559-1578, February.
    10. Yu Han & Chaoyue Yu & Zhe Feng & Hanchu Du & Caisi Huang & Kening Wu, 2021. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern Based on Spatial Syntax Classification—Taking Ningbo, China, as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Xi Chen & Dawei Xu & Safa Fadelelseed & Lianying Li, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis and Control of Landscape Eco-Security at the Urban Fringe in Shrinking Resource Cities: A Case Study in Daqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Yanzhen Hou & Zhenlong Zhang & Yuerong Wang & Honghu Sun & Chang Xu, 2022. "Function Evaluation and Coordination Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the Perspective of Type–Intensity–Connection: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Jen D. Snowball, 2013. "The economic, social and cultural impact of cultural heritage: methods and examples," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 22, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Su, Kai & Yu, Qiang & Yue, Depeng & Zhang, Qibin & Yang, Lan & Liu, Zhili & Niu, Teng & Sun, Xiaoting, 2019. "Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    16. Rong Guo & Tong Wu & Mengran Liu & Mengshi Huang & Luigi Stendardo & Yutong Zhang, 2019. "The Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in the Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:83:y:2019:i:c:p:105-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.