IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p898-d1637713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Feasibility of PPPs for Cultural Heritage Enhancement in UNESCO Sites: The Case of Matera (Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Torrieri

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. Ponzio 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Alessia Crisopulli

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. Ponzio 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Marco Rossitti

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. Ponzio 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The complexity of decision making about cultural heritage has drawn attention to hybrid and innovative models to support the challenge of its enhancement. In this context, public–private partnership (PPP) has emerged as a promising tool to address the public administration’s lack of financial resources. However, several barriers have hindered the wide application of PPPs to support heritage enhancement initiatives, thus highlighting the need to provide decision-making processes with appropriate methodological tools, especially in contexts such as UNESCO sites, where heritage conservation rises to a global challenge. Based on these premises, the paper proposes a methodological approach to support decision making about implementing PPPs for heritage enhancement in UNESCO sites by evaluating the financial sustainability of different PPP scenarios, while considering their ability to ensure a fair distribution of benefits between the public and the private. After providing a comprehensive picture of the relationship between PPPs and UNESCO sites in Italy, such an approach was tested on a case study, the “I Sassi di Matera” site that, over the last decades, has made PPPs a central tool for its enhancement strategy. The test results reveal the opportunities of the proposed approach to inform decision making and delve into PPP’s potential for heritage enhancement while outlining the related future research perspectives to ensure its broad scalability to other UNESCO contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Torrieri & Alessia Crisopulli & Marco Rossitti, 2025. "Assessing the Feasibility of PPPs for Cultural Heritage Enhancement in UNESCO Sites: The Case of Matera (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:898-:d:1637713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Torrieri & Marina Fumo & Michele Sarnataro & Gigliola Ausiello, 2019. "An Integrated Decision Support System for the Sustainable Reuse of the Former Monastery of “Ritiro del Carmine” in Campania Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    2. L. E. Limonov & M. V. Nesena & A. A. Semenov, 2020. "Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Evaluate the Efficiency of Cultural Heritage Preservation Projects in Historic Towns of Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 530-537, October.
    3. Michael Klaver & Bianca Currie & James George Sekonya & Kaera Coetzer, 2024. "Learning through Place-Based Implementation of the UNESCO MAB Program in South Africa’s Oldest Biosphere Reserve: A Case Study of the Kogelberg Biosphere Reserve," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Jeanette Snowball & Sinead Courtney, 2010. "Cultural heritage routes in South Africa: Effective tools for heritage conservation and local economic development?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 563-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Reuse Projects: An Integrated Approach for the Historical Rural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Rogerson Christian M., 2014. "Rethinking slum tourism: tourism in South Africa’s rural slumlands," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(26), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Stoffelen, Arie, 2018. "Tourism trails as tools for cross-border integration: A best practice case study of the Vennbahn cycling route," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 91-102.
    4. Agnese Amato & Maria Andreoli & Massimo Rovai, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building by Introducing New Functions: A Scenario Evaluation Based on Participatory MCA Applied to a Former Carthusian Monastery in Tuscany, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Aihui Jiang & Jun Cai & Fulong Chen & Baolei Zhang & Zhiwei Wang & Qiaoyun Xie & Sisi Yu, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Jen D. Snowball, 2013. "The economic, social and cultural impact of cultural heritage: methods and examples," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 22, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Li, Guo & Hu, Wenmin, 2019. "A network-based approach for landscape integration of traditional settlements: A case study in the Wuling Mountain area, southwestern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 105-112.
    9. Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Nadia Pintossi & Gamze Dane, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Natacha Klein & Tomás B. Ramos & Pauline Deutz, 2022. "Advancing the Circular Economy in Public Sector Organisations: Employees’ Perspectives on Practices," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 759-781, June.
    11. Merwe Clinton David van der, 2016. "Tourist guides’ perceptions of cultural heritage tourism in South Africa," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 34(34), pages 117-130, December.
    12. Zijie Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2022. "A Cultural Route Perspective on Rural Revitalization of Traditional Villages: A Case Study from Chishui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. He Zhang & Yutong Wang & Yu Qi & Siwei Chen & Zhengkai Zhang, 2024. "Assessment of Yellow River Region Cultural Heritage Value and Corridor Construction across Urban Scales: A Case Study in Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Nancy M. P. Bocken & Ilka Weissbrod & Maria Antikainen, 2021. "Business Model Experimentation for the Circular Economy: Definition and Approaches," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 49-81, June.
    15. Marta Dell’Ovo & Federico Dell’Anna & Raffaella Simonelli & Leopoldo Sdino, 2021. "Enhancing the Cultural Heritage through Adaptive Reuse. A Multicriteria Approach to Evaluate the Castello Visconteo in Cusago (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:898-:d:1637713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.