IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6637-d572822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Karol Król

    (Digital Cultural Heritage Laboratory, Department of Land Management and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Balicka 253c, 30-198 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Cultural heritage is a complex and multi-faceted concept, thus eluding a definition. Consequently, it is a daunting task to assess the cultural heritage potential of a country, region, or community unambiguously. The paper defines “cultural heritage potential” and presents an example of a synthetic assessment of the potential with Poland as an example. The assessment involved several normalised diagnostic variables grouped into four thematic fields. This way, cultural heritage potential could be represented by a “synthetic quality index”. The analysis yielded a ranked list of voivodeships (third-tier subdivision units) and their classification (typology) regarding cultural heritage potential. An in-depth analysis demonstrated that the cultural heritage potential rank of a voivodeship could be determined by values of selected diagnostic valuables, such as the number of heritage objects, number of food products of documented quality and particular cultural significance, and extensive cultural infrastructure. The typology can be a background for decision-making with the consequences of voivodeship classification depending on the context of a specific analysis. The proposed method for assessing cultural heritage potential is not related to the territorial extent of the area. Any quantifiable attribute of cultural heritage can be used in the assessment regardless of the unit of measure. Such an assessment can be useful for the identification of trouble areas, areas of concern, and model areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6637-:d:572822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6637/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6637/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elzbieta Rogalska, 2018. "Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 707-723, December.
    2. Wójcik-Leń, Justyna & Leń, Przemysław & Mika, Monika & Kryszk, Hubert & Kotlarz, Paweł, 2019. "Studies regarding correct selection of statistical methods for the needs of increasing the efficiency of identification of land for consolidation—A case study in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Aitziber Egusquiza & Mikel Zubiaga & Alessandra Gandini & Claudia de Luca & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Systemic Innovation Areas for Heritage-Led Rural Regeneration: A Multilevel Repository of Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Chiara Manfriani & Giovanni Gualdani & Giacomo Goli & Bruce Carlson & Anna Rita Certo & Paola Mazzanti & Marco Fioravanti, 2021. "The Contribution of IoT to the Implementation of Preventive Conservation According to European Standards: The Case Study of the “Cannone” Violin and Its Historical Copy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Jaafar, Mastura & Noor, Shuhaida Md & Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa, 2015. "Perception of young local residents toward sustainable conservation programmes: A case study of the Lenggong World Cultural Heritage Site," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 154-163.
    6. Blanka Škrabić Perić & Blanka Šimundić & Vinko Muštra & Marijana Vugdelija, 2021. "The Role of UNESCO Cultural Heritage and Cultural Sector in Tourism Development: The Case of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Milada Šťastná & Antonín Vaishar & Jiří Brychta & Kristýna Tuzová & Jan Zloch & Veronika Stodolová, 2020. "Cultural Tourism as a Driver of Rural Development. Case Study: Southern Moravia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Jeanette Snowball & Sinead Courtney, 2010. "Cultural heritage routes in South Africa: Effective tools for heritage conservation and local economic development?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 563-576.
    9. Kukula, Karol & Bogocz, Danuta, 2014. "Zero Unitarization Method And Its Application In Ranking Research In Agriculture," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 7(3), July.
    10. Piera Buonincontri & Alessandra Marasco & Haywantee Ramkissoon, 2017. "Visitors’ Experience, Place Attachment and Sustainable Behaviour at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Alfred Krogmann & Peter Ivanič & Hilda Kramáreková & Lucia Petrikovičová & František Petrovič & Henrich Grežo, 2021. "Cultural Tourism in Nitra, Slovakia: Overview of Current and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Sunwoo Park & Namho Chung & Won Seok Lee, 2020. "Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Haywantee Ramkissoon, 2015. "Authenticity, satisfaction, and place attachment: A conceptual framework for cultural tourism in African island economies," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 292-302, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wioletta Knapik & Karol Król, 2023. "Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Alper Bozkurt & Ferhat Şeker, 2023. "Harmonizing Heritage and Artificial Neural Networks: The Role of Sustainable Tourism in UNESCO World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Paweł Dziekański & Adam Wyszkowski & Piotr Prus & Andrzej Pawlik & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2022. "Zero Waste as a Determinant of Shaping Green Economy Processes on the Example of Communes of Eastern Poland in 2010–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Aihui Jiang & Jun Cai & Fulong Chen & Baolei Zhang & Zhiwei Wang & Qiaoyun Xie & Sisi Yu, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Joana Gonçalves & Ricardo Mateus & José Dinis Silvestre & Ana Pereira Roders, 2020. "Going beyond Good Intentions for the Sustainable Conservation of Built Heritage: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Wilawan Jansri, 2019. "Perception of Residents, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development in the Old Town Muang Songkhla, Thailand," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 07WJ, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    7. Patrik Maturkanič & Ivana Tomanová Čergeťová & Roman Králik & Ľubomír Hlad & Marie Roubalová & Jose Garcia Martin & Viliam Judák & Amantius Akimjak & Lucia Petrikovičová, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Social and Pastoral Service in Eastern Slovakia and Northwestern Czech Republic during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Two Selected Units of Former Czechoslovakia in the Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Beata Raszka & Halina Dzieżyc & Maria Hełdak, 2021. "Assessment of the Development Potential of Post-Industrial Areas in Terms of Social, Economic and Environmental Aspects: The Case of Wałbrzych Region (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Wenxi (Bella) Bai & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Jose Weng Chou Wong, 2023. "Memorable Tourism Experience Research: A Systematic Citation Review (2009–2021)," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    11. Bart Neuts & Senne Kimps & Jan van der Borg, 2021. "Resident Support for Tourism Development: Application of a Simplified Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale on Developing Destinations in Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Giotis Georgios, 2022. "Preliminary Results on the Employment Effect of Tourism. A meta-analysis," Papers 2206.00174, arXiv.org.
    13. Rogerson Christian M., 2014. "Rethinking slum tourism: tourism in South Africa’s rural slumlands," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(26), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Yi Lu, 2022. "The Measurement of High-Quality Development Level of Tourism: Based on the Perspective of Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Maddalena Ferretti & Maria Giada Di Baldassarre & Caterina Rigo, 2022. "Reactivating Built Heritage with Shared, Creative, and Transcalar Approaches: An Exploration of the Marche Apennine Inner Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Mariusz Czupich & Justyna Łapińska & Vojtěch Bartoš, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of the European Union’s Capital Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Stoffelen, Arie, 2018. "Tourism trails as tools for cross-border integration: A best practice case study of the Vennbahn cycling route," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 91-102.
    18. Mirabela-Constanta MATEI & Alexandru-David ABRUDAN & Leonard-Calin ABRUDAN & Maria-Madela ABRUDAN, 2021. "Modelling Tourism And Culture Expenditure In Romania €“ Evidence Of Change In Cultural Values," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 119-128, November.
    19. Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Przemysław Leń, 2021. "Evaluation of the Symmetry of Statistical Methods Applied for the Identification of Agricultural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6637-:d:572822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.