IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3656-d1070849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Wioletta Knapik

    (Department of Statistics and Social Policy, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Karol Król

    (Department of Land Management and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 253c, 30-198 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Cultural heritage consolidates regional cultural identity, expands social capital, and stimulates local communities. These functions make it an important component of sustainable socioeconomic development. The objective of the article is to identify vanishing components of cultural heritage in Małopolskie Voivodeship and propose ways to use them to enhance regional development and promote rural cultural heritage. Moreover, the article aims at identifying such components of cultural heritage that could be included and presented more extensively in future strategic documents despite being disregarded or only superficially acknowledged to date. The research involved a representative sample of the adult residents of rural areas in Małopolskie Voivodeship, Poland ( n = 400) using the computer-aided telephone interviewing method (CATI). The research shows that the awareness of the people in Małopolskie Voivodeship is dominated by the ‘classical’ perception of cultural heritage components. The respondents confirmed that traditional professions were still practiced in the voivodeship, and that artisan products were available. The most common of these were beekeeping, sculpture, carpentry, lacemaking and embroidery, smithery, pottery, plaiting, weaving, and musical instrument production. According to the respondents, the most frequent components of vanishing cultural heritage were shrines on trees, old barns (69%), wells (55%) and old root cellars (40%). The respondents most often mentioned farmers’ wives’ associations as independent social and professional organizations in rural areas that promote food traditions. A survey, literature review, and study of strategic documents demonstrated that digital cultural heritage was absent in the responses and strategic documents, even though it is found in rural Małopolskie Voivodeship as rustic cyberfolklore, for example. It is a research gap worth investigating.

Suggested Citation

  • Wioletta Knapik & Karol Król, 2023. "Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3656-:d:1070849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong Lu & Yide Liu & Ivan Lai & Li Yang, 2017. "Awe: An Important Emotional Experience in Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2022. "Initiatives to Preserve the Content of Vanishing Web Hosting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Olczak, Barbara & Wilkosz-mamcarczyk, Magdalena & Prus, Barbara & Hodor, Katarzyna & Dixon-gough, Robert, 2022. "Application of the building cohesion method in spatial planning to shape patterns of the development in a suburban historical landscape of a 'village within Kraków'," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Fodil Fadli & Mahmoud AlSaeed, 2019. "Digitizing Vanishing Architectural Heritage; The Design and Development of Qatar Historic Buildings Information Modeling [Q-HBIM] Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Aitziber Egusquiza & Mikel Zubiaga & Alessandra Gandini & Claudia de Luca & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Systemic Innovation Areas for Heritage-Led Rural Regeneration: A Multilevel Repository of Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2020. "Culture and Place-Based Development: A Socio-Economic Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 130-159, July.
    7. Milada Šťastná & Antonín Vaishar & Jiří Brychta & Kristýna Tuzová & Jan Zloch & Veronika Stodolová, 2020. "Cultural Tourism as a Driver of Rural Development. Case Study: Southern Moravia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Chiara Garau, 2015. "Perspectives on Cultural and Sustainable Rural Tourism in a Smart Region: The Case Study of Marmilla in Sardinia (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Karol Król & Robert Kao & Józef Hernik, 2019. "The Scarecrow as an Indicator of Changes in the Cultural Heritage of Rural Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Ammar Azzouz, 2019. "A tale of a Syrian city at war," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 107-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dauro M. Zocchi & Naji Sulaiman & Julia Prakofjewa & Renata Sõukand & Andrea Pieroni, 2024. "Local Wild Food Plants and Food Products in a Multi-Cultural Region: An Exploratory Study among Diverse Ethnic Groups in Bessarabia, Southern Moldova," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-35, February.
    2. Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Rățulea & Monica Defta & Florina-Mădălina Harabagiu & Daniela Sorea, 2024. "The Potential for Sustainable Local Development through Digital Communication and Digitization of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources in Făgăraș Land, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Ruggiero Sardaro & Piermichele La Sala, 2022. "Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Monica C. M. Parlato & Francesca Valenti & Simona M. C. Porto, 2022. "Sustainable Promotion of Traditional Rural Buildings as Built Heritage Attractions: A Heritage Interpretation Methodology Applied in South Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 687-720, May.
    5. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    7. Bart Neuts & Senne Kimps & Jan van der Borg, 2021. "Resident Support for Tourism Development: Application of a Simplified Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale on Developing Destinations in Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Ni Sheng & U Wa Tang, 2015. "Spatial Techniques to Visualize Acoustic Comfort along Cultural and Heritage Routes for a World Heritage City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Xiaokang Wang & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yue Tang & Yilin Sun & Honglin Wu & Chuang Cheng, 2023. "Architectural Continuity Assessment of Rural Settlement Houses: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Luca Salvati & Marco Zitti, 2017. "Urban Concentration, Agglomeration Economies and the Spatial Structure of Italian Local Labor Market Areas," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Lars Mewes & Leonie Tuitjer & Peter Dirksmeier, 2024. "Exploring the variances of climate change opinions in Germany at a fine-grained local scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2023. "Cultural Heritage Topics in Online Queries: A Comparison between English- and Polish-Speaking Internet Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Maddalena Ferretti & Maria Giada Di Baldassarre & Caterina Rigo, 2022. "Reactivating Built Heritage with Shared, Creative, and Transcalar Approaches: An Exploration of the Marche Apennine Inner Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Revisiting the Balassa–Samuelson effect: International tourism and cultural proximity," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(8), pages 915-944, December.
    15. Carmen Bizzarri & Roberto Micera, 2021. "The Valorization of Italian “Borghi” as a Tool for the Tourism Development of Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1, June.
    16. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Silvia Cerisola & Elisa Panzera, 2021. "Cultural and Creative Cities and Regional Economic Efficiency: Context Conditions as Catalyzers of Cultural Vibrancy and Creative Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Rui Zhang & Chang Zhang, 2022. "Classification and Application of Digital Technologies in Landscape Heritage Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & He Zhu & Zhe Cheng, 2016. "Culture Sustainability: Culture Quotient (CQ) and Its Quantitative Empirical Application to Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Lee, Sang-Hee & Park, Cheol-Min, 2022. "The effect of hunter-wild boar interactions and landscape heterogeneity on wild boar population size: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3656-:d:1070849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.