IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ierequ/v13y2018i4p707-723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Elzbieta Rogalska

    (University of Wamia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Research background: Building effective conditions for doing business and sup-porting entrepreneurs is currently considered as a basic growth determinant. It is a policy objective not only at the national level, but also an important factor influencing the competitive potential of regions and local communities. It is especially important in the case of Central European countries and regions that face the problem of closing development gap. Therefore, comparative research with regard to entrepreneurship conditions, especially at spatially lower aggregation level, can provide important background for proposing policy guidelines. Purpose of the article: The main objective of the article is to analyse changes in disparities in regard to entrepreneurship conditions in Poland at NUTS 3 level in the years 2010 and 2015. Methods: The entrepreneurship conditions are analysed based on 5 criteria. As a result, they are considered as a multiple-criteria phenomenon. Therefore, in the article the dynamic analysis was implemented, where taxonomic measure of development was assessed with TOPSIS method based on median vector Weber. The obtained taxonomic measure allowed to rank the NUTS 3 regions starting with the ones characterised with the best conditions for entrepreneurs to the ones with the worst conditions, to group then into relatively homogenous subsets, and finally to verify the changes in the disparities between the regions in the analysed period. Findings & Value added: The research confirms that in spite of visible improvements significant disparities at the regional level in regard to entrepreneurial conditions should be considered as an actual and important problem for regional policy in Poland. This factor can negatively affect the possibilities of reaching spatially sustainable growth objectives. From the long-term perspective, the disparities can still negatively affects social and political growth environment in Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Elzbieta Rogalska, 2018. "Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 707-723, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:707-723
    DOI: 10.24136/eq.2018.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/eq.2018.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaromir VRBKA & Vojtech STEHEL, 2019. "The Issue Of Multicriteria Decision-Making: Model Example Of Business Partner Risk Assessment," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 738-749, November.
    2. Katarzyna Cheba & Iwona Bąk, 2021. "Environmental Production Efficiency in the European Union Countries as a Tool for the Implementation of Goal 7 of the 2030 Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Samuele Lo Piano & Andrea Saltelli, 2020. "Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 775-802, June.
    5. Hrivnák Michal & Roháčiková Oľga & Schwarcz Pavol, 2020. "What Drives the Private Innovation in Rural Areas? In-Depth Case Study of Slovak Rural Region," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Katarzyna Chrobocińska, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Regional Competitiveness in Poland from 2010–2019 in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Kenyon MacGregor Robert & MacGregor Pelikánová Radka, 2019. "The nature and meaning of the Directive 2013/34/EU on financial statements according to the CJ EU," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(53), pages 246-261, January.
    8. Janusz Grabara & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Marek Szajt, 2020. "Sustainable University Development through Sustainable Human Resources and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Role of Sustainable Innovation and Work Environment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(54), pages 480-480, April.
    9. Michael Olumekor & Hossam Haddad & Nidal Mahmoud Al-Ramahi, 2023. "The Relationship between Search Engines and Entrepreneurship Development: A Granger-VECM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurship; multiple-criteria analysis; TOPSIS; median vector Weber; NUTS 3; Poland; region;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:707-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.