IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13961-d954841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage in Shandong Province

Author

Listed:
  • Aihui Jiang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Jun Cai

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Fulong Chen

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Baolei Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Zhiwei Wang

    (School of Surveying and Geo-Infomatics, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Qiaoyun Xie

    (School of Life Science, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Sisi Yu

    (Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Public Administration, Law School, Institute of Local Government Development, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)

Abstract

Although the sustainability of cultural heritage plays important roles in the inheritance of humans’ civilization and history, assessments of such fields is still limited. In this paper, the spatiotemporal analysis method and coupling coordination model were applied to assess the sustainability of cultural heritage in Shandong Province. Results show that (1) the National Key Cultural Relics Protection Units (“cultural units“ hereinafter) of Shandong Province have obvious convergence of spatiotemporal and city distribution; (2) although the tourism response degree of each city vary greatly, their tourism income exhibits positive correlation (i.e., correlation coefficient reaches 0.6639) with cultural units; (3) the coordination between cultural units, capital inputs, and tourism income in different cities is different, mainly shows three levels of well coordination (Jinan, Jining, Qingdao, Yantai, Weifang, and Zibo), general coordination (Zaozhuang, Weihai, Tai’an, Liaocheng, Heze, Linyi, and Rizhao), and poor coordination (Dezhou, Binzhou, and Dongying). These findings imply that the SDGs 11.4.1 is an effective indicator to promote the sustainable development of cultural heritage. However, there are still shortcomings at the city level, and the distribution of heritage and tourism response in the area should be considered in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihui Jiang & Jun Cai & Fulong Chen & Baolei Zhang & Zhiwei Wang & Qiaoyun Xie & Sisi Yu, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Cultural Heritage in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13961-:d:954841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sevasti Chalkidou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Petros Patias & Charalampos Georgiadis, 2021. "Spatially Enabled Web Application for Urban Cultural Heritage Monitoring and Metrics Reporting for the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Regina Grazuleviciene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Aurimas Rapalavicius, 2021. "Measuring the Outcomes of a Participatory Research Study: Findings from an Environmental Epidemiological Study in Kaunas City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Zainab Binti Roslan & Zuliskandar Ramli & Muhammad Rizal Razman & M. R. M. Asyraf & M. R. Ishak & R. A. Ilyas & N. M. Nurazzi, 2021. "Reflections on Local Community Identity by Evaluating Heritage Sustainability Protection in Jugra, Selangor, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Jeanette Snowball & Sinead Courtney, 2010. "Cultural heritage routes in South Africa: Effective tools for heritage conservation and local economic development?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 563-576.
    5. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Taher Osman & Emad Kenawy & Karim I. Abdrabo & David Shaw & Aref Alshamndy & Mohamed Elsharif & Muhammad Salem & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Reda M. Aly & Bahaa Elboshy, 2021. "Voluntary Local Review Framework to Monitor and Evaluate the Progress towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals at a City Level: Buraidah City, KSA and SDG11 as A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Blanka Škrabić Perić & Blanka Šimundić & Vinko Muštra & Marijana Vugdelija, 2021. "The Role of UNESCO Cultural Heritage and Cultural Sector in Tourism Development: The Case of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Ya Yao & Xinyuan Wang & Linlin Lu & Chuansheng Liu & Qiang Wu & Hongge Ren & Shu Yang & Ruiqi Sun & Lei Luo & Kai Wu, 2021. "Proportionated Distributions in Spatiotemporal Structure of the World Cultural Heritage Sites: Analysis and Countermeasures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Piera Buonincontri & Roberto Micera, 2016. "The experience co-creation in smart tourism destinations: a multiple case analysis of European destinations," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 285-315, September.
    10. María García-Hernández & Manuel De la Calle-Vaquero & Claudia Yubero, 2017. "Cultural Heritage and Urban Tourism: Historic City Centres under Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karol Król, 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Ernestyna Szpakowska-Loranc, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Analysis of Contemporary Cultural Buildings in the Historic Urban Fabric as Sustainable Spaces—Krakow Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    3. José Manuel Ordóñez-de-Haro & Jordi Perdiguero & Juan-Luis Jiménez, 2020. "Fuel prices at petrol stations in touristic cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 45-69, February.
    4. Mercè Roca & Jaume Albertí & Alba Bala & Laura Batlle-Bayer & Joan Ribas-Tur & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer, 2021. "Sustainability in the Opera Sector: Main Drivers and Limitations to Improve the Environmental Performance of Scenography," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Junjie Gao & Younghwan Pan, 2022. "Evaluating Influencing Factors of Tourists’ Experiences with Smart Tour Guide System: A Mixed Method Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Kristine Kern & Janne Irmisch & Colette Odermatt & Wolfgang Haupt & Ingrid Kissling-Näf, 2021. "Cultural Heritage, Sustainable Development, and Climate Policy: Comparing the UNESCO World Heritage Cities of Potsdam and Bern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Joris Van Doorsselaere, 2021. "Connecting Sustainable Development and Heritage Education? An Analysis of the Curriculum Reform in Flemish Public Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Giotis Georgios, 2022. "Preliminary Results on the Employment Effect of Tourism. A meta-analysis," Papers 2206.00174, arXiv.org.
    9. Antonella Lerario & Silvia Di Turi, 2018. "Sustainable Urban Tourism: Reflections on the Need for Building-Related Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno & Jordi Pascual, 2021. "Place Branding for Smart Cities and Smart Tourism Destinations: Do They Communicate Their Smartness?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Xingshan Wang & Lu Tang & Wei Chen & Jianxin Zhang, 2022. "Impact and Recovery of Coastal Tourism Amid COVID-19: Tourism Flow Networks in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Rogerson Christian M., 2014. "Rethinking slum tourism: tourism in South Africa’s rural slumlands," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(26), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Viccaro, Mauro & Romano, Severino & Prete, Carmelina & Cozzi, Mario, 2021. "Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Stoffelen, Arie, 2018. "Tourism trails as tools for cross-border integration: A best practice case study of the Vennbahn cycling route," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 91-102.
    15. Mirabela-Constanta MATEI & Alexandru-David ABRUDAN & Leonard-Calin ABRUDAN & Maria-Madela ABRUDAN, 2021. "Modelling Tourism And Culture Expenditure In Romania €“ Evidence Of Change In Cultural Values," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 119-128, November.
    16. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Dana Badau & Adela Badau, 2018. "The motric, Educational, Recreational and Satisfaction Impact of Adventure Education Activities in the Urban Tourism Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & Beata Bal-Domańska, 2019. "The National Parks in the Context of Tourist Function Development in Territorially Linked Municipalities in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Edward Ayebeng Botchway & Kofi Agyekum & Jenefailus Nikoi Kotei-Martin & Hayford Pittri & Annabel Morkporkpor Ami Dompey & Samuel Owusu Afram & Nathaniel Elikplim Asare, 2023. "Achieving Healthy City Development in Ghana: Referencing Sustainable Development Goal 11," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Stefania Środa-Murawska & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Jadwiga Biegańska & Leszek S. Dąbrowski, 2021. "Culture and Sustainable Tourism: Does the Pair Pay in Medium-Sized Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13961-:d:954841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.