IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v165y2026ics0264837726000918.html

Risk governance in urban planning: A comprehensive policy analysis in the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Plan, London

Author

Listed:
  • Ataee, Sina
  • Abdolabadi, Hamid
  • Aval, Farzaneh Abedian
  • Bhandari, Santosh
  • Mahjoobi, Emad
  • Relvas, Hélder
  • Lopes, Myriam

Abstract

Effective risk management is essential for large-scale urban development projects to mitigate potential threats and enhance resilience. This study examines the risk governance strategies embedded in the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) plan in London, England, providing a structured analysis of its risk management framework. The research categorizes risks into five core areas, identification, assessment, mitigation, response, and monitoring, aligning with contemporary risk governance models. The OPDC plan demonstrates a strong commitment to proactive and adaptive risk strategies by integrating sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and contingency planning. Key risk factors, including environmental hazards, infrastructure vulnerabilities, housing policies, and socio-economic uncertainties, are systematically assessed.Findings indicate that the OPDC plan effectively incorporates both preventative and responsive risk measures, emphasizing sustainable urban design, environmental resilience, and regulatory compliance. Additionally, risk response mechanisms such as contingency planning and crisis management enhance adaptability to evolving urban challenges. However, gaps remain in adaptive governance, particularly in real-time risk tracking and cross-sectoral coordination. This study highlights the necessity of continuous risk evaluation and dynamic policy adjustments to strengthen urban resilience. Insights from this research offer valuable lessons for policymakers, urban planners, and practitioners seeking to integrate robust risk governance frameworks into urban development initiatives. The findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive, stakeholder-inclusive, and sustainability-driven approach to urban risk management, contributing to long-term urban resilience and effective policy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ataee, Sina & Abdolabadi, Hamid & Aval, Farzaneh Abedian & Bhandari, Santosh & Mahjoobi, Emad & Relvas, Hélder & Lopes, Myriam, 2026. "Risk governance in urban planning: A comprehensive policy analysis in the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Plan, London," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000918
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000918
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gordon & Patricia Warren, 2022. "Canary Wharf's transformation from planning disaster to London's second business district," Chapters, in: John Landis (ed.), Megaprojects for Megacities, chapter 12, pages 382-406, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Gregory S. Parnell, 2009. "Evaluation of Risks in Complex Problems," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Terry M. Williams & Knut Samset & Kjell J. Sunnevåg (ed.), Making Essential Choices with Scant Information, chapter 12, pages 230-256, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Xiuquan Deng & Zhu Lu & Xinmiao Yang & Qiuhong Zhao & Dehua Gao & Bing Bai, 2018. "Formation Mechanism and Coping Strategy of Public Emergency for Urban Sustainability: A Perspective of Risk Propagation in the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Martha-Liliana Carreño & Omar Cardona & Alex Barbat, 2007. "Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 40(1), pages 137-172, January.
    5. repec:wbk:wbpubs:12356 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jan Corfee-Morlot & Ian Cochran & Stéphane Hallegatte & Pierre-Jonathan Teasdale, 2011. "Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 169-197, January.
    7. J. Birkmann & P. Buckle & J. Jaeger & M. Pelling & N. Setiadi & M. Garschagen & N. Fernando & J. Kropp, 2010. "Extreme events and disasters: a window of opportunity for change? Analysis of organizational, institutional and political changes, formal and informal responses after mega-disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(3), pages 637-655, December.
    8. Claire A. Dunlop & Claudio M. Radaelli, 2013. "Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(3), pages 599-619, October.
    9. Busenberg, George J., 2001. "Learning in Organizations and Public Policy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 173-189, May.
    10. Haile, Kaleab K. & Nillesen, Eleonora & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Impact of formal climate risk transfer mechanisms on risk-aversion: Empirical evidence from rural Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Andreas Klinke & Ortwin Renn, 2012. "Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 273-292, March.
    12. Scott Baker & David Ponniah & Simon Smith, 1999. "Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 205-213.
    13. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496, December.
    14. Valerie November, 2008. "Spatiality of Risk," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(7), pages 1523-1527, July.
    15. Katrina Hinsberg & Majia Nadesan & Anthony Lamanna, 2024. "Communicative Framework Development for Construction Risk Governance: An Analysis of Risk and Trust Perception for Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Siyu Zhang & Hao Wang & Yuexi Zhou & Mohammadreza Kamali & Xuwen He & Mohammadreza Khalaj & Yu Xia, 2022. "Catalytic Ozonation of the Secondary Effluents from the Largest Chinese Petrochemical Wastewater Treatment Plant—A Stability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Gavin Shatkin, 2014. "Reinterpreting the Meaning of the ‘Singapore Model’: State Capitalism and Urban Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 116-137, January.
    18. Gaspare D’Amico & Roberta Arbolino & Lei Shi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    20. Eric Dickson & Judy L. Baker & Daniel Hoornweg & Asmita Tiwari, 2012. "Urban Risk Assessments : Understanding Disaster and Climate Risk in Cities," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Page & Lisa Dilling, 2020. "How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 499-516, August.
    2. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    3. Aigner, Philipp & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2023. "Enhancing gradient capital allocation with orthogonal convexity scenarios," ICIR Working Paper Series 47/23, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    4. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    5. Eling, Martin & Wirfs, Jan, 2019. "What are the actual costs of cyber risk events?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1109-1119.
    6. Felix Riede, 2014. "Towards a science of past disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(1), pages 335-362, March.
    7. Meng Hsuan Chou & Michael Howlett & Kei Koga, 2016. "Image and Substance Failures in Regional Organisations: Causes, Consequences, Learning and Change?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 50-61.
    8. Lazar, Emese & Zhang, Ning, 2025. "Model Risk of Volatility Models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-22.
    9. Daniel Nohrstedt & Jacob Hileman & Maurizio Mazzoleni & Giuliano Baldassarre & Charles F. Parker, 2022. "Exploring disaster impacts on adaptation actions in 549 cities worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas & Wang, Ruodu, 2024. "A theory of multivariate stress testing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 851-866.
    11. McDermott, T.K.J. & Surminski, S., 2018. "Normative interpretations of climate risk assessment and how it affects local decision making – a study at the city scale in Cork, Ireland," Working Papers 309607, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    12. Michele Bonollo & Martino Grasselli & Gianmarco Mori & Havva Nilsu Oz, 2025. "Informative Risk Measures in the Banking Industry: A Proposal based on the Magnitude-Propensity Approach," Papers 2511.21556, arXiv.org.
    13. Cornwell, Nikki & Bilson, Christopher & Gepp, Adrian & Stern, Steven & Vanstone, Bruce J., 2023. "Modernising operational risk management in financial institutions via data-driven causal factors analysis: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Meng Hsuan Chou & Michael Howlett & Kei Koga, 2016. "Image and Substance Failures in Regional Organisations: Causes, Consequences, Learning and Change?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 50-61.
    15. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Salvatore D. Tomarchio & Michael P. B. Gallaugher, 2026. "Mixtures of regressions using matrix-variate heavy-tailed distributions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 20(1), pages 11-38, March.
    17. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    18. Masahiko Egami & Rusudan Kevkhishvili, 2020. "Time reversal and last passage time of diffusions with applications to credit risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 795-825, July.
    19. Stephanie E. Austin & Robbert Biesbroek & Lea Berrang-Ford & James D. Ford & Stephen Parker & Manon D. Fleury, 2016. "Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change in OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.