IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v154y2025ics0264837725000997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy

Author

Listed:
  • Shwababa, Siviwe
  • Child, Matthew F.
  • de Vos, Alta
  • Mneno, Naledi
  • Clements, Hayley S.

Abstract

Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Shwababa, Siviwe & Child, Matthew F. & de Vos, Alta & Mneno, Naledi & Clements, Hayley S., 2025. "Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adeoye O. Akinola, 2019. "Africa and the Land Reform Question," Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, in: Adeoye O. Akinola & Henry Wissink (ed.), Trajectory of Land Reform in Post-Colonial African States, chapter 0, pages 1-12, Springer.
    2. Hayley S. Clements & Matthew F. Child & Lehman Lindeque & Kyra Lunderstedt & Alta Vos, 2022. "Lessons from COVID-19 for wildlife ranching in a changing world," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1040-1048, December.
    3. Peter A Lindsey & Jonathan Barnes & Vincent Nyirenda & Belinda Pumfrett & Craig J Tambling & W Andrew Taylor & Michael t’Sas Rolfes, 2013. "The Zambian Wildlife Ranching Industry: Scale, Associated Benefits, and Limitations Affecting Its Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Judith Sitters & Duncan M. Kimuyu & Truman P. Young & Philippe Claeys & Harry Olde Venterink, 2020. "Negative effects of cattle on soil carbon and nutrient pools reversed by megaherbivores," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 360-366, May.
    5. Ruth Hall, 2004. "A Political economy of land reform in South Africa," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(100), pages 213-227, June.
    6. Therezah Achieng & Kristine Maciejewski & Michelle Dyer & Reinette Biggs, 2020. "Using a Social-ecological Regime Shift Approach to Understand the Transition from Livestock to Game Farming in the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Felicia Keesing & Richard S. Ostfeld & Sharon Okanga & Steven Huckett & Brett R. Bayles & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & L. Page Fredericks & Tyler Hedlund & Virginia Kowal & Heather Tallis & Charles M. War, 2018. "Consequences of integrating livestock and wildlife in an African savanna," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 566-573, October.
    8. Jun Han, 2020. "How to promote rural revitalization via introducing skilled labor, deepening land reform and facilitating investment?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 577-582, July.
    9. Jun Han, 2020. "How to promote rural revitalization via introducing skilled labor, deepening land reform and facilitating investment?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 577-582, July.
    10. Valente, Christine, 2009. "The Food (In)Security Impact of Land Redistribution in South Africa: Microeconometric Evidence from National Data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1540-1553, September.
    11. Alston, Lee J. & Libecap, Gary D. & Mueller, Bernardo, 2000. "Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 162-188, March.
    12. Clements, Hayley S. & De Vos, Alta & Bezerra, Joana Carlos & Coetzer, Kaera & Maciejewski, Kristine & Mograbi, Penelope J. & Shackleton, Charlie, 2021. "The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clements, Hayley S. & De Vos, Alta & Bezerra, Joana Carlos & Coetzer, Kaera & Maciejewski, Kristine & Mograbi, Penelope J. & Shackleton, Charlie, 2021. "The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Gong, Maogang & Zhong, Yanan & Zhang, Yun & Elahi, Ehsan & Yang, Yuanxi, 2023. "Have the new round of agricultural land system reform improved farmers' agricultural inputs in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Ren, Tiantian & Wang, Na & Xiao, Helu & Zhou, Zhongbao, 2024. "Efficiency of funding to rural revitalization and regional heterogeneity of technologies in China: Dynamic network nonconvex metafrontiers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Jinxia Wang & Yunfeng Tan & Qiong Hu & Huarong Cheng & Fang Gao, 2024. "Research on talent cultivation for rural revitalization based on three-party evolutionary game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Jiang, Youxue, 2024. "Public service equalization, digital financial inclusion and the rural revitalization: Evidence from Chinese 283 prefecture-level cities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    6. Xujun Zhai & Lian Zheng & Hong Lin, 2024. "Four-party evolutionary game analysis of enterprise environmental behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Thiemo Fetzer & Samuel Marden, 2017. "Take What You Can: Property Rights, Contestability and Conflict," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 757-783, May.
    8. Gersbach, Hans & Siemers, Lars-H. R., 2010. "Land Reforms And Economic Development," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 527-547, September.
    9. Miranda, Bruno Varella & de Oliveira, Gustavo Magalhães, 2023. "Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental agreements under high monitoring costs: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. Shafi, Ahsan & Wang, Zhanqi & Ehsan, Muhsan & Riaz, Faizan Ahmed & Ali, Muhammad Rashid & Xu, Feng, 2023. "A game theory approach to land acquisition conflicts in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Chowdhury, Prabal Roy, 2013. "Land acquisition: Political intervention, fragmentation and voice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 63-78.
    12. Dufwenberg, Martin & Köhlin, Gunnar & Martinsson, Peter & Medhin, Haileselassie, 2016. "Thanks but no thanks: A new policy to reduce land conflict," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 31-50.
    13. Claudio Ferraz, 2015. "Explaining Agriculture Expansion and Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon – 1980/98," Discussion Papers 0106, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    14. Edward B. Barbier, 2005. "Frontier Expansion and Economic Development," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 286-303, April.
    15. Mueller, Bernardo, 2022. "Property rights and violence in indigenous land in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. María Cubel & Santiago Sanchez-Pages, 2020. "Property Out of Conflict: A Survey and Some New Results," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 130(6), pages 891-927.
    17. Grainger, Corbett A. & Costello, Christopher J., 2014. "Capitalizing property rights insecurity in natural resource assets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 224-240.
    18. Amanzhuli Yerkenhazi & Kerim Mamat & Abudukeyimu Abulizi & Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Xuemei Wei & Shanshan Tang & Junxia Wang & Shaojie Bai & Le Yuan, 2025. "Identification of Production–Living–Ecological Spatial Conflicts and Multi-Scenario Simulations in Extreme Arid Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Gudibande, Rohan & Nandy, Abhinaba & Srivastava, Vatsalya, 2024. "Land-redistribution and coercive violence," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1502, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer & Janvry, Alain de & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2005. "A Tale of Two Communities: Explaining Deforestation in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 219-235, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.