IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v154y2025ics0264837725000997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy

Author

Listed:
  • Shwababa, Siviwe
  • Child, Matthew F.
  • de Vos, Alta
  • Mneno, Naledi
  • Clements, Hayley S.

Abstract

Land reform is a key social justice movement across the world, typically focused on agricultural land uses. However, in many parts of the world, land reform properties exist in regions that have high biodiversity value, where options exist for integrating land reform with wildlife-based land uses to promote both conservation and socio-economic development. To effectively design and implement policies aimed at unlocking this under-explored pathway towards inclusive wildlife economies, we need information on the opportunities and barriers confronting the establishment and operation of viable wildlife enterprises on redistributed land. We conducted a survey of 19 landholders awarded land through reform in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. We aimed to understand the state of wildlife economy development and assess investment needs for these market entrants. Their characteristics were contrasted with data on 74 established wildlife ranches and 21 conventional livestock farms. Despite all land reform properties listing wildlife-based economic activities in their business plans and most (84 %) having wildlife, only 42 % were generating (very limited) income from their wildlife. Common barriers to upscaling revenues from wildlife were a lack of infrastructure (particularly fencing, water, accommodation) and wildlife stocks. Engagement in the wildlife economy is further hindered by lack of decision-support on viable wildlife business models and subsequent lack of access to skills development and market information. Our results show mismatches between activities that are supported by government and property business plans, and those that are context-appropriate and viable. We suggest that South Africa’s land reform programmes need to develop targeted infrastructure and skills development that consider the most appropriate business model for a given site. The barriers and opportunities outlined here could inform strategies that leverage state and private investment to more effectively create viable wildlife-based business models and achieve the dual goals of social justice and biodiversity conservation in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Shwababa, Siviwe & Child, Matthew F. & de Vos, Alta & Mneno, Naledi & Clements, Hayley S., 2025. "Unlocking opportunities for meaningful participation of land reform beneficiaries in the wildlife economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.