IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v47y2017icp29-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Governance restricts”: A contextual assessment of the wastewater treatment policy in the Guadalupe River Basin, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Casiano Flores, Cesar
  • Özerol, Gül
  • Bressers, Hans

Abstract

Lack of wastewater treatment is among the main water problems worldwide. The implementation of wastewater treatment policies faces varying challenges given the many different contexts. Therefore, context-sensitive approaches are required from a governance perspective. This paper aims to improve the understanding of the role of contextual factors in water and wastewater governance drawing on empirical evidence from Latin America, with a focus on the Guadalupe River Basin in Mexico. The findings indicate that the governance context restricts the implementation of wastewater treatment policy. Thus, future reforms should consider the top-down nature of the policy implementation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Casiano Flores, Cesar & Özerol, Gül & Bressers, Hans, 2017. "“Governance restricts”: A contextual assessment of the wastewater treatment policy in the Guadalupe River Basin, Mexico," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 29-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:47:y:2017:i:c:p:29-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178716302880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2017.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Thiel & Catrin Egerton, 2011. "Re-scaling of resource governance as institutional change: the case of water governance in Portugal," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 383-402.
    2. Marleen van Rijswick & Jurian Edelenbos & Petra Hellegers & Matthijs Kok & Stefan Kuks, 2014. "Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: an integrated method to assess the governance of water," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 725-742, September.
    3. Akhmouch, Aziza & Correia, Francisco Nunes, 2016. "The 12 OECD principles on water governance – When science meets policy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(PA), pages 14-20.
    4. Pinto, Francisco Silva & Marques, Rui Cuhna, 2015. "Tariff recommendations: A Panacea for the Portuguese water sector?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 36-44.
    5. Tariq Judeh & Marwan Haddad & Gül Özerol, 2017. "Assessment of water governance in the West Bank, Palestine," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2/3), pages 119-134.
    6. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Governance and Governance Networks in Europe," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 505-525, July.
    7. Meier, Kenneth J. & McFarlane, Deborah R., 1995. "Statutory Coherence and Policy Implementation: The Case of Family Planning," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 281-298, September.
    8. Nasser Al-Khatib & Jawad A.H. Shoqeir & Gül Özerol & Linda Majaj, 2017. "Governing the reuse of treated wastewater in irrigation: the case study of Jericho, Palestine," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2/3), pages 135-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cesar Casiano Flores & Joep Crompvoets & Maria Eugenia Ibarraran Viniegra & Megan Farrelly, 2019. "Governance Assessment of the Flood’s Infrastructure Policy in San Pedro Cholula, Mexico: Potential for a Leapfrog to Water Sensitive," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Buntinx, Ine & Crompvoets, Joep & Stöcker, Claudia & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2020. "Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Vélez-Ramírez, Alberto & Rivera-Castañeda, Patricia & Muñoz-Pizza, Dalia M., 2022. "Institutional capacity determinants in a global south city: the case of a wastewater utility in Zacatecas, Mexico," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. D'Amore, Gabriella & Landriani, Loris & Lepore, Luigi, 2021. "Ownership and sustainability of Italian water utilities: The stakeholder role," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Massimiliano Agovino & Massimiliano Cerciello & Antonio Garofalo & Loris Landriani & Luigi Lepore, 2021. "Corporate governance and sustainability in water utilities. The effects of decorporatisation in the city of Naples, Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 874-890, February.
    7. S. Jalal Mirnezami & Cheryl de Boer & Ali Bagheri, 2020. "Groundwater governance and implementing the conservation policy: the case study of Rafsanjan Plain in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 8183-8210, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grilli, Gianluca & Curtis, John, 2021. "Knowledge and awareness of water quality protection issues within Local Authorities," Papers WP712, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    2. Cesar Casiano Flores & Joep Crompvoets & Maria Eugenia Ibarraran Viniegra & Megan Farrelly, 2019. "Governance Assessment of the Flood’s Infrastructure Policy in San Pedro Cholula, Mexico: Potential for a Leapfrog to Water Sensitive," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    3. D'Amore, Gabriella & Landriani, Loris & Lepore, Luigi, 2021. "Ownership and sustainability of Italian water utilities: The stakeholder role," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Buntinx, Ine & Crompvoets, Joep & Stöcker, Claudia & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2020. "Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Oghenekaro Nelson Odume & Blessing Nonye Onyima & Chika Felicitas Nnadozie & Gift Ochonogor Omovoh & Thandi Mmachaka & Blessing Odafe Omovoh & Jude Edafe Uku & Frank Chukwuzuoke Akamagwuna & Francis O, 2022. "Governance and Institutional Drivers of Ecological Degradation in Urban River Ecosystems: Insights from Case Studies in African Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    7. Henriques, Alda A. & Camanho, Ana S. & Amorim, Pedro & Silva, Jaime G., 2020. "Performance benchmarking using composite indicators to support regulation of the Portuguese wastewater sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Bhatti, Muhammad Tousif & Anwar, Arif A. & Ali Shah, Muhammad Azeem, 2019. "Revisiting telemetry in Pakistan’s Indus Basin Irrigation System," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 11(11):1-20.
    9. Costa, Mirella Motta e & Neto, Susana, 2023. "Exploratory analysis of the water governance frameworks regarding the OECD principles in two river basins in Brazil and Portugal," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Doyle, Mary-Alice & Schurer, Stefanie & Silburn, Sven, 2022. "Unintended consequences of welfare reform: Evidence from birthweight of Aboriginal children in Australia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Kherbache, Nabil & Oukaci, Kamal, 2020. "Assessment of capital expenditure in achieving sanitation-related MDG targets and the uncertainties of the SDG targets in Algeria," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    12. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2016. "Gouverner sans les instruments ? La difficile construction des politiques relatives à la perte d'autonomie des personnes âgées," Post-Print hal-01258274, HAL.
    13. Seijger, Chris & Hellegers, Petra, 2023. "How do societies reform their agricultural water management towards new priorities for water, agriculture, and the environment?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    14. Oliver Maaß & Philipp Grundmann, 2018. "Governing Transactions and Interdependences between Linked Value Chains in a Circular Economy: The Case of Wastewater Reuse in Braunschweig (Germany)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Patel, Vijay K. & Manley, Scott C. & Hair, Joseph F. & Ferrell, O.C. & Pieper, Torsten M., 2016. "Is stakeholder orientation relevant for European firms?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 650-660.
    16. Mbzibain, Aurelian & Ongolo, Symphorien, 2019. "Complementarity, rivalry and substitution in the governance of forests: Learning from independent forest monitoring system in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Mbzibain, Aurelian & Tchoudjen, Teodyl Nkuintchua, 2021. "NGO-state relations in the monitoring of illegal forest logging and wildlife trafficking in Central Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Susanne Wuijts & Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick & Peter P. J. Driessen, 2021. "Achieving European Water Quality Ambitions: Governance Conditions for More Effective Approaches at the Local-Regional Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Landriani, Loris & Agrifoglio, Rocco & Metallo, Concetta & Lepore, Luigi, 2022. "The role of knowledge in water service coproduction and policy implications," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Nathalie Brender & Bledi Yzeiraj & Florian Dupuy, 2017. "Risk and accountability: Drivers for change in network governance. The case of school restaurants governance in a Swiss city," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1384636-138, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:47:y:2017:i:c:p:29-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.