IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v93y2024ics0301420724004252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking state-led formalisation of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM): Towards mining licence categorisation, women empowerment and environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur-Holmes, Francis
  • Ofosu, George

Abstract

Securing a mining licence or permit is seen as the gateway for conducting artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) operations. Yet, the policy and the academic discourse on the environmental impacts of ASM and formalisation policies inadequately capture the diverse perspectives of institutional and local stakeholders regarding the regulatory and legal framework for the heterogeneous nature of ASM operations. This paper, therefore, addresses this gap by providing critical, empirical evidence and interpretations of institutional and local stakeholders’ perspectives of Ghana’s state-led ASM formalisation framework and its impacts on mining licence acquisition. Drawing on findings from multiple qualitative studies in Ghana, we found that the one ‘small-scale’ mining licence regime was problematic and took no account of the diverse environmental impacts, the safety concerns, and the uneven economic returns from the various mining methods (alluvial, underground, and surface/open-pit mining) employed for ASM operations. The findings also showed that the one-size-fits-all mining licence hinders a) the development of appropriate environmental regulations and mine waste management practices for the various local ASM operations, b) the designing of context-specific land reclamation approaches, c) the provision of logistics, training, and technical assistance to address the divergent environmental impacts, and d) the economic empowerment of women who seek to have economic visibility in the sector. The findings further demonstrated that the current ASM formalisation framework needs to be reformed through categorisation of the mining licence to reflect the dimensions of ASM operations, such as the multi-tier licence classification we propose – underground‘ghetto’licence, alluvial licence, surface/open-pit licence, medium-scale licence, and co-existence/partnership licence. This classification could help the country’s minerals regulatory body, the Minerals Commission, provide specific guidelines for mining operations, environmental management practices, and occupational health and safety protocols/practices for miners in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur-Holmes, Francis & Ofosu, George, 2024. "Rethinking state-led formalisation of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM): Towards mining licence categorisation, women empowerment and environmental sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724004252
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724004252
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724004252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.