IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v90y2024ics0301420724002265.html

Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Measham, Thomas
  • Walker, Jim
  • Haslam McKenzie, Fiona
  • Kirby, Jason
  • Williams, Caroline
  • D'Urso, Jillian
  • Littleboy, Anna
  • Samper, Agnes
  • Rey, Rebecca
  • Maybee, Bryan
  • Brereton, David
  • Boggs, Guy

Abstract

Post-mining transition is a growing area of interest in research, policy and practice. One of the key reasons for this growing attention is the increasing number of mines closing, and expected to close, in coming decades around the world. Another reason for the heightened focus on closure and transition stems from the poor track record of closure and relinquishment of mines. Thousands of mines sit in an idle state of ‘care and maintenance’ partly because of the difficulties involved in closing a mine and concerns about transfer of residual liability for sites. The growing importance of successful closure and post-mining transition can be conceptualised in relation to recent phenomena. These include the development of just transition narratives which are strongly tied to the de-carbonisation agenda. Another is the focus within industry on post-mining land use (PMLU). There are few examples of successful post-mining transition to learn from. One such example - the post-coal transition in Germany - offers some lessons however there are limits to the transferability of these lessons to other contexts. In response to these challenges, this paper puts forward a research agenda comprising four key areas. The first of these is the need for research and deliberation on what post-mining means in different contexts, as there is a lack of shared understanding of what post-mining is or should be. The second is the need to incorporate a wider range of values and perspectives into analysis, planning, decision-making and actions about closure and transitions. The third area is the need for greater attention to integration between the technical, biophysical and engineering dimensions of closure and transition, and how these intersect with cultural, social and economic dimensions. A fourth need is to elevate the scale at which research and decision-making about closure occurs, from the site to the regional scale and beyond. Collectively, these four areas underpin a shift in thinking beyond notions of returning to prior state and instead focus on the opportunities for post-mining communities and economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Measham, Thomas & Walker, Jim & Haslam McKenzie, Fiona & Kirby, Jason & Williams, Caroline & D'Urso, Jillian & Littleboy, Anna & Samper, Agnes & Rey, Rebecca & Maybee, Bryan & Brereton, David & Boggs,, 2024. "Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724002265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cansu Perdeli Demirkan & Nicole M. Smith & Sebnem Duzgun, 2022. "A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment for Mine Closure and Repurposing Alternatives in Colorado, USA," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Brauers, Hanna & Oei, Pao-Yu & Walk, Paula, 2020. "Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 37, pages 238-253.
    3. Oei, Pao-Yu & Brauers, Hanna & Herpich, Philipp, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979.
    4. Everingham, Jo-Anne & Rolfe, John & Lechner, Alex Mark & Kinnear, Susan & Akbar, Delwar, 2018. "A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 397-406.
    5. Bainton, Nicholas & Holcombe, Sarah, 2018. "A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 468-478.
    6. Pao-Yu Oei & Hanna Brauers & Philipp Herpich, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979, September.
    7. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Amirshenava, Sina & Osanloo, Morteza, 2022. "Strategic planning of post-mining land uses: A semi-quantitative approach based on the SWOT analysis and IE matrix," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Hendrychová, Markéta & Svobodova, Kamila & Kabrna, Martin, 2020. "Mine reclamation planning and management: Integrating natural habitats into post-mining land use," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Worden, Sandy & Svobodova, Kamila & Côte, Claire & Bolz, Pascal, 2024. "Regional post-mining land use assessment: An interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Kelly, J. Andrew & Clinch, J. Peter & Kelleher, L. & Shahab, S., 2020. "Enabling a just transition: A composite indicator for assessing home-heating energy-poverty risk and the impact of environmental policy measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Aristizabal-H, Gustavo & Goerke-Mallet, Peter & Kretschmann, Jürgen & Restrepo-Baena, Oscar Jaime, 2023. "Sustainability of coal mining. Is Germany a post-mining model for Colombia?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Fernandez, Viviana, 2019. "Assessing cycles of mine production and prices of industrial metals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Tim Schwanen, 2021. "Achieving just transitions to low-carbon urban mobility," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 685-687, July.
    15. Simshauser, Paul & Gilmore, Joel, 2022. "Climate change policy discontinuity & Australia's 2016-2021 renewable investment supercycle," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Szewczyk-Świątek, 2025. "Sustainable Transformation of Post-Mining Areas: Discreet Alliance of Stakeholders in Influencing the Public Perception of Heavy Industry in Germany and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Aleksandra Wyrzykowska & Monika Janiszek, 2025. "Models of Post-Mining Land Reuse in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-37, October.
    3. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2025. "Rehabilitation costs paid by mining enterprises in Turkey: Comparison of rehabilitation costs with their shares in mining operation costs and other environmental costs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Alonzo, Dennis & Tabelin, Carlito Baltazar & Dalona, Irish Mae & Abril, Jan Michael Vincent & Beltran, Arnel & Orbecido, Aileen & Villacorte-Tabelin, Mylah & Resabal, Vannie Joy & Promentilla, Michael, 2024. "Working with the community for the rehabilitation of legacy mines: Approaches and lessons learned from the literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Kozłowska-Woszczycka, Aleksandra & Pactwa, Katarzyna & Konieczna-Fuławka, Martyna, 2025. "From black gold to green goals: The uneven path of just transition in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Kamila Svobodova & Jo‐Anne Everingham & Sarah Mackenzie & Kathy Witt, 2026. "Designing Community Participation for Mine Closure and Social Transition," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 197-209, January.
    7. Daly, Christine A. & Grandjambe, Ryan & L’Hommecourt, Jean & Donald, Gillian & Arrobo, Bori & Gerlach, S. Craig & McCarthy, Dan & McIntyre, Don AhnAhnsisi, 2025. "Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. de Azevedo Ruchkys, Úrsula & Ferreira, Eduardo Evangelista & do Amaral Figueiredo, Múcio & Ruchkys, Alice, 2025. "Governing mined landscapes through memory: Afro-centred approaches to post-extractive transitions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Santos, Cecília Santiago & Praça Leite, Mariangela Garcia & Mota de Lima, Hernani, 2025. "Integrated mine closure planning adherence Index: a new approach for evaluating mine closure plans," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2025. "Spatial Variations in Perceptions of Decarbonization Impacts and Public Acceptance of the Bioeconomy in Western Macedonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2025. "Rehabilitation costs paid by mining enterprises in Turkey: Comparison of rehabilitation costs with their shares in mining operation costs and other environmental costs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Gruenhagen, Jan Henrik & Terrill, Janice & Cox, Stephen, 2025. "Igniting sparks for the transition of a coal mining region: The role of firm- and system-level agency to innovate, diversify and create new growth paths in a regional innovation system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Andrea Furnaro, 2023. "Geographies of devaluation: Spatialities of the German coal exit," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(6), pages 1355-1371, September.
    5. Albulut, Koray, 2026. "Addressing social vulnerabilities resulting from low-carbon energy transition policies in EU-27 countries: A systematic survey of the literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).
    6. Jarosław Kaczmarek, 2022. "The Balance of Outlays and Effects of Restructuring Hard Coal Mining Companies in Terms of Energy Policy of Poland PEP 2040," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Kamila Svobodova & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Vítězslav Moudrý & Éléonore Lèbre & Martin Stringer & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2022. "Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Colvin, R.M. & Przybyszewski, E., 2022. "Local residents' policy preferences in an energy contested region – The Upper Hunter, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. de Azevedo Ruchkys, Úrsula & Ferreira, Eduardo Evangelista & do Amaral Figueiredo, Múcio & Ruchkys, Alice, 2025. "Governing mined landscapes through memory: Afro-centred approaches to post-extractive transitions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Worden, Sandy & Svobodova, Kamila & Côte, Claire & Bolz, Pascal, 2024. "Regional post-mining land use assessment: An interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Marius R. Busemeyer & Sophia Stutzmann & Tobias Tober, 2025. "Digitalization and the green transition: Different challenges, same policy responses?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 422-447, April.
    12. Bruns, Daniel & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2025. "The Impact of Germany's Coal Phase-Out on Local Property Values," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325450, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2024. "Demonstrating the need for a just transition: Socioeconomic diagnosis of polish cities living on hard coal mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Gholami, Alireza & Tokac, Batur & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Gao, Yajuan & Zhang, Congqing & Wang, Yilin & Wang, Shuaihao & Zou, Yunjin & Gao, Junhong & Wang, Zeyu, 2023. "Fiscal decentralization and rural resource utilization efficiency: Evidence from quasi-natural experiment in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    18. Milan Babić & Daniel Mertens, 2025. "Decarbonization under geoeconomic distress? Energy shocks, carbon lock‐ins, and Germany's pathway toward net zero," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 448-468, April.
    19. Marina Blohm, 2021. "An Enabling Framework to Support the Sustainable Energy Transition at the National Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak & Wes Grebski, 2024. "Empirical Assessment of the Efficiency of Poland’s Energy Transition Process in the Context of Implementing the European Union’s Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-36, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.