IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v103y2025ics0301420725000947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans

Author

Listed:
  • Daly, Christine A.
  • Grandjambe, Ryan
  • L’Hommecourt, Jean
  • Donald, Gillian
  • Arrobo, Bori
  • Gerlach, S. Craig
  • McCarthy, Dan
  • McIntyre, Don AhnAhnsisi

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of traditional land use planning in mine closure and reclamation at seven oil sands mines operating in the traditional territory of Fort McKay First Nation, Alberta, Canada. Life of Mine Closure Plans lacked evidence that consultation and engagement with local Indigenous communities on mine closure and reclamation was guided by principles and actions towards truth and reconciliation. While all plans stated that traditional land use was one of the planned outcomes, there was limited evidence of planning for the renewal of cultural landscapes and relationships. A critical gap and opportunity for reclaiming Indigenous homelands is to align provincial mine closure and reclamation policy and law with national and international Indigenous rights law and policy. This is an essential step to sustain the community and culture of local Indigenous communities, like Fort McKay First Nation, who are interconnected with their traditional lands, waters, and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Daly, Christine A. & Grandjambe, Ryan & L’Hommecourt, Jean & Donald, Gillian & Arrobo, Bori & Gerlach, S. Craig & McCarthy, Dan & McIntyre, Don AhnAhnsisi, 2025. "Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725000947
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725000947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.