IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v84y2023ics030142072300507x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative assessment of geoheritage with the GAM and MEREC-based PROMETHEE-GAIA method

Author

Listed:
  • Zorlu, Kuttusi
  • Dede, Volkan
  • Zorlu, Burçin Şeyda
  • Serin, Soner

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the geoheritage potentials of various landforms with quantitative methods. For this purpose, five districts of Erzurum province (Narman, Oltu, Olur, Uzundere, and Tortum) located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye were selected. In these districts, high-diversity topographies have been formed due to geological and geomorphological processes. Thirteen landforms have been identified through field studies. Quantitative evaluation of these elements was carried out with the integrated use of GAM and MEREC-based PROMETHEE-GAIA methods. According to the results obtained, Narman Valley and Fairy Chimneys, Tortum Lake and Waterfall, Oltu Rainbow Hills, Tortum Zökün Lake and Floating Islands, and Kilimli Fairy Chimneys have been identified as positive value geosites of high importance. The research results are thought to make various contributions theoretically and practically.

Suggested Citation

  • Zorlu, Kuttusi & Dede, Volkan & Zorlu, Burçin Şeyda & Serin, Soner, 2023. "Quantitative assessment of geoheritage with the GAM and MEREC-based PROMETHEE-GAIA method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300507x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072300507X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sema Kayapinar Kaya & Ejder Ayçin & Dragan Pamucar, 2023. "Evaluation of social factors within the circular economy concept for European countries," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 73-108, March.
    2. Mustafa Özgeriş & Faris Karahan, 2021. "Use of geopark resource values for a sustainable tourism: a case study from Turkey (Cittaslow Uzundere)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4270-4284, March.
    3. Ľubomír Štrba & Jana Kolačkovská & Dušan Kudelas & Branislav Kršák & Csaba Sidor, 2020. "Geoheritage and Geotourism Contribution to Tourism Development in Protected Areas of Slovakia—Theoretical Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Homogenous Groups’ Preferences by Using AIP and AIJ Group AHP-PROMETHEE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Michele Sisto & Antonio Di Lisio & Filippo Russo, 2022. "Geosite Assessment as a Tool for the Promotion and Conservation of Irpinia Landscape Geoheritage (Southern Italy)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Nasrollahi, Sadaf & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Jahangir, Mohammad-Hossein & Aryaee, Sara, 2023. "Selecting suitable wave energy technology for sustainable development, an MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 756-772.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alicja K. Zawadzka, 2021. "Architectural and Urban Attractiveness of Small Towns: A Case Study of Polish Coastal Cittaslow Towns on the Pomeranian Way of St. James," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Rucitarahma Ristiawan & Edward Huijbens & Karin Peters, 2023. "Projecting Development through Tourism: Patrimonial Governance in Indonesian Geoparks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sudhanshu Joshi & Manu Sharma & Banu Y. Ekren & Yigit Kazancoglu & Sunil Luthra & Mukesh Prasad, 2023. "Assessing Supply Chain Innovations for Building Resilient Food Supply Chains: An Emerging Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. África de la Hera-Portillo & Julio López-Gutiérrez & Luis Moreno-Merino & Miguel Llorente-Isidro & Rod Fensham & Mario Fernández & Marwan Ghanem & Karmah Salman & Jose Ángel Sánchez-Fabián & Nicolás G, 2023. "Geodiversity of Las Loras UNESCO Global Geopark: Hydrogeological Significance of Groundwater and Landscape Interaction and Conceptual Model of Functioning," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, January.
    5. José Luis Sánchez-Cortez & Kathleen Vélez-Macías & Vinicio Macas-Espinosa & Clelia Naranjo-Freire, 2023. "Characterization of Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of the Fluvial-Glacial Landscapes in the Culebrillas Lagoon (Ecuador)," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Jorge Manuel Prieto-Ballester & Vanessa Miguel-Barrado, 2022. "Perceived Rural Development in UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Canan Cengiz & Şükran Şahin & Bülent Cengiz & Mükerrem Bahar Başkır & Pelin Keçecioğlu Dağlı, 2021. "Evaluation of the Visitor Understanding of Coastal Geotourism and Geoheritage Potential Based on Sustainable Regional Development in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Aslı Bozdağ, 2023. "A spatial analysis for sustainable planning of tourism impacts using GIS: Çesme (Cyssus), İzmir, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9877-9902, September.
    9. Sanaz Davardoust & Faris Karahan, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Rural Tourism. The Case of Uzundere District, Erzurum, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Mária Barančoková & Daniela Hutárová & Maroš Nikolaj, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity for Conservation Purposes in Slovenské rudohorie Mountains (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Daniela Hutárová & Ivana Kozelová & Jana Špulerová, 2021. "Tourism Development Options in Marginal and Less-Favored Regions: A Case Study of Slovakia´s Gemer Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Maria Triassi & Bruna De Simone & Paolo Montuori & Immacolata Russo & Elvira De Rosa & Fabiana Di Duca & Claudio Crivaro & Vittorio Cerullo & Patrizia Pontillo & Sergi Díez, 2023. "Determination of Residual Municipal Solid Waste Composition from Rural and Urban Areas: A Step toward the Optimization of a Waste Management System for Efficient Material Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Gokhan Ozkaya & Ayse Demirhan, 2023. "Analysis of Countries in Terms of Artificial Intelligence Technologies: PROMETHEE and GAIA Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Sallam, Emad S. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Ermolaev, Vladimir A., 2022. "Geoheritage resources and new direction of infrastructural growth in Egypt: From geosite assessment to policy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Janetta Nestorová Dická & Alena Gessert & Lenka Bryndzová & Tamás Telbisz, 2020. "Behavioural Survey of Local Inhabitants’ Views and Attitudes about Slovak Karst National Park in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Svetlana O. Zorina & Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2023. "Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Marián Lukáč & Ľubomír Štrba & Alexander Černega & Samer Khouri, 2021. "Recent State Policy and Its Impact on Geopark Establishment and Operation in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Mengdi Wang & Kaixuan Tan & Yongmei Li & Yanshi Xie & Wenzhou Xiao & Yang Xu & Yunting Tian, 2022. "Study on the Sustainable Development of Popular Science Tourism Based on the SWOT Analysis for the Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Geanella Herrera-Narváez & Nelson Jiménez-Orellana & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2020. "Puyango, Ecuador Petrified Forest, a Geological Heritage of the Cretaceous Albian-Middle, and Its Relevance for the Sustainable Development of Geotourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Aditi Acharya & Biraj Kanti Mondal & Tuhin Bhadra & Kamal Abdelrahman & Prabuddh Kumar Mishra & Anuj Tiwari & Rima Das, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis of Geo-Ecotourism Site Suitability Using AHP and GIS for Sustainable and Resilient Tourism Planning in West Bengal, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300507x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.