IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v75y2022ics0301420721004700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalized model for assessing and intensifying the recycling of metal-bearing industrial waste: A new approach to the resource policy of manganese industry in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Jandieri, Gigo

Abstract

A generalized model for assessing the overall, techno-economic-ecological efficiency of recycling metal-bearing technogeneous resources has been developed, based on a mathematical model for analyzing the break-even point, specially improved for this purpose. An algorithm for theoretical calculations has been compiled, which also incorporates a sequence of techno-organizational operations for maximizing the efficiency of the recycling system. As a particular case, an example of assessing the effectiveness and the possibility of intensifying recycling of manufacturing waste of the manganese industry of Georgia was considered. It is shown that the intensification of the internal industrial recycling of manganese-bearing wastes is associated with the need for their preliminary treatment, bringing to the condition necessary for break-even processing. Through theoretical-computational analysis of the recycling efficiency index (REI), it is determined that in the case of pyrometallurgical processing, the condition of break-even is the presence of manganese in the recycled raw material in the amount not less than 24%. In the case of hydrometallurgical processing, this threshold is reduced up to 7%. Consequently, resources that satisfy these conditions or can satisfy them after pretreatment should be classified as suitable for recycling and included in the special state register of metal-bearing technogenic deposits. Only that part of industrial waste, in which it is technically impossible or economically unprofitable to provide the specified threshold concentrations, can be disposed of in other industries. The proposed approach to assessing and intensifying the efficiency of recycling will make it possible to significantly expand the resource base of metallurgical production in Georgia. Herewith, on average, the degree of beneficial use of manganese will be increased by 45–50%. Depending on the quality of currently consumed manganese concentrates (Mn 48-28%) the degree of reduction of their consumption rate will reach 30–60%. This will extend the life cycle of the Chiatura manganese mine by 25–30 years. Harmful anthropogenic impact on the environment will be reduced by 3.4–3.5 times.

Suggested Citation

  • Jandieri, Gigo, 2022. "A generalized model for assessing and intensifying the recycling of metal-bearing industrial waste: A new approach to the resource policy of manganese industry in Georgia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0301420721004700
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721004700
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dino, Giovanna Antonella & Mehta, Neha & Rossetti, Piergiorgio & Ajmone-Marsan, Franco & De Luca, Domenico Antonio, 2018. "Sustainable approach towards extractive waste management: Two case studies from Italy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 33-43.
    2. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Sam Mitra, 2019. "Depletion, technology, and productivity growth in the metallic minerals industry," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 19-37, April.
    4. Upadhyay, Arvind & Laing, Tim & Kumar, Vikas & Dora, Manoj, 2021. "Exploring barriers and drivers to the implementation of circular economy practices in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Yolandi Schoeman & Paul Oberholster & Vernon Somerset, 2021. "A Zero-Waste Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Model for the Iron and Steel Industry in Developing Countries: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Garbarino, Elena & Orveillon, Glenn & Saveyn, Hans G.M., 2020. "Management of waste from extractive industries: The new European reference document on the Best Available Techniques," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Lanyan & Liu, Shi Qiang & Kozan, Erhan & Corry, Paul & Masoud, Mahmoud, 2021. "A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of mine supply chain management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. António Mateus & Luís Martins, 2021. "Building a mineral-based value chain in Europe: the balance between social acceptance and secure supply," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 239-261, July.
    3. Upadhyay, Saurabh, 2022. "Drivers for sustainable mining waste management – A mixed-method study on the Indian Mining Industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Luthra, Sunil & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Sarkis, Joseph & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2022. "Resources melioration and the circular economy: Sustainability potentials for mineral, mining and extraction sector in emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Gilbert Silvius & Aydan Ismayilova & Vicente Sales-Vivó & Micol Costi, 2021. "Exploring Barriers for Circularity in the EU Furniture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Adedoyin, Festus Fatai & Abbas, Jaffar & Hussain, Khadim, 2021. "The impact of energy depletion and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Thailand: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1439-1450.
    7. Mathivathanan, Deepak & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Khorana, Sangeeta & Rana, Nripendra P. & Arora, Bimal, 2022. "Drivers of circular economy for small and medium enterprises: Case study on the Indian state of Tamil Nadu," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 997-1015.
    8. Zauresh Atakhanova, 2021. "Support services in the extractive industries and the role of innovation," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 141-150, April.
    9. Shuying Li & Guoping Tu, 2022. "Probabilistic Linguistic Matrix Game Based on Fuzzy Envelope and Prospect Theory with Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, March.
    10. She, Weijun & Mabrouk, Fatma, 2023. "Impact of natural resources and globalization on green economic recovery: Role of FDI and green innovations in BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Julia Romano Sanches & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Camila Gonçalves Castro & Roberta Souza Piao & Henrique Rozenfeld & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Li, Ying & Cen, Hongyi & Lin, Tai-Yu & Lin, Yi-Nuo & Chiu, Yung-Ho, 2022. "Sustainable coal mine and coal land development in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Matthew Quayson & Chunguang Bai & Lihua Sun & Joseph Sarkis, 2023. "Building blockchain‐driven dynamic capabilities for developing circular supply chain: Rethinking the role of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4821-4840, November.
    14. Kasmaeeyazdi, Sara & Abdolmaleki, Mehdi & Ibrahim, Elsy & Jiang, Jingyi & Marzan, Ignacio & Rodríguez, Irene Benito, 2021. "Copernicus data to boost raw material source management: Illustrations from the RawMatCop programme," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Celina Bade & Alexandra Olsacher & Philip Boehme & Hubert Truebel & Lena Bürger & Leonard Fehring, 2024. "Sustainability in the pharmaceutical industry—An assessment of sustainability maturity and effects of sustainability measure implementation on supply chain security," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 224-242, January.
    16. Zhengai Dong & Lichen Zhang & Houjian Li & Yanhui Gong & Yue Jiang & Qiumei Peng, 2022. "Knowledge Mapping and Institutional Prospects on Circular Carbon Economy Based on Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Larisa Vazhenina & Elena Magaril & Igor Mayburov, 2023. "Digital Management of Resource Efficiency of Fuel and Energy Companies in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Moritz Böhmecke‐Schwafert & Marie Wehinger & Robin Teigland, 2022. "Blockchain for the circular economy: Theorizing blockchain's role in the transition to a circular economy through an empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3786-3801, December.
    19. Quayson, Matthew & Bai, Chunguang & Mahmoudi, Amin & Hu, Weihao & Chen, Wei & Omoruyi, Osayuwamen, 2023. "Designing a decision support tool for integrating ESG into the natural resource extraction industry for sustainable development using the ordinal priority approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    20. Joanna Kulczycka & Ewa Dziobek & Anita Szmiłyk, 2020. "Challenges in the management of data on extractive waste—the Polish case," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(3), pages 341-347, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0301420721004700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.