Author
Listed:
- Fan, Xiaojun
- Tao, Wenxia
- Yu, Haowei
- Wang, Zheng
Abstract
Research on live streaming engagement has long focused on its positive aspect of promoting consumer conversion but has neglected the potential loss of post-transaction value due to high interaction intensity. This study reveals the “engagement paradox†through a mixed study of actual live streaming and post-purchase evaluation data and survey-based research: although high engagement enhances immediate purchase intention, it significantly reduces post-purchase satisfaction through the dynamic imbalance of cognitive-emotional resources. Based on the integrated framework of elaboration likelihood model, expectation confirmation theory, information overload theory, and flow theory, it is found that the paradox stems from the contextual differentiation of dual paths contextual differentiation, i.e., information dissemination and high interactivity features in live sales contexts trigger information overload and flow experiences, which can lead to satisfaction decay by amplifying the expectation-confirmation gap. This finding bridges the perceived divide in the existing literature on the paradoxical validity of engagement. Further applying gender schema theory, the study breaks new ground by finding that male consumers exhibit more significant flow attrition effects in high-engagement live streaming due to heuristic decision-making tendencies, providing key boundary conditions for gender marketing theory in digital contexts. And these findings also provide practical guidance for designing consumer engagement strategies on live-streaming platforms.
Suggested Citation
Fan, Xiaojun & Tao, Wenxia & Yu, Haowei & Wang, Zheng, 2025.
"The higher the better? A study on the dark side of high engagement atmosphere in live streaming sales on consumer post-purchase satisfaction,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925000827
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104303
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925000827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.