IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v23y1995i1p79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of maintenance technology implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Hipkin, I. B.
  • Lockett, A. G.

Abstract

The benefits and impact of new manufacturing technology have been documented extensively in the literature. Management of the maintenance function is receiving more attention in the trade journals, but limited studies have been published in the academic literature. This study (following the general approach adopted by Meredith in an earlier paper) considers the implementation of the reliability-centred maintenance technology by identifying some generally accepted 'postulates' taken from the literature and analysing these in terms of six cases. Some postulates are accepted, while others provide scope for further consideration. Analysis of postulates comparable with those of Meredith show that all but one corroborate his findings. The study concludes with the identification of some key success factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hipkin, I. B. & Lockett, A. G., 1995. "A study of maintenance technology implementation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 79-88, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:1:p:79-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(94)00062-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doll, WJ & Vonderembse, MA, 1991. "The evolution of manufacturing systems: Towards the post-industrial enterprise," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 401-411.
    2. Dimnik, TP & Johnston, DA, 1993. "Manufacturing managers and the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 155-162, March.
    3. Dorothy Leonard-Barton, 1987. "Implementing Structured Software Methodologies: A Case of Innovation in Process Technology," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 6-17, June.
    4. Currie, WL, 1989. "The art of justifying new technology to top management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 409-418.
    5. McLoughlin, Ian & Rose, Howard & Clark, Jon, 1985. "Managing the introduction of new technology," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 251-262.
    6. Pintelon, LM & Van Wassenhove, LN, 1990. "A maintenance management tool," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 59-70.
    7. Bennett, D. J. & Jenney, B. W., 1980. "Reliability: Its implications in production systems design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 433-440.
    8. Efraim Turban, 1967. "The Use of Mathematical Models in Plant Maintenance Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 342-358, February.
    9. Eliezer Geisler & Albert H. Rubenstein, 1987. "The Successful Implementation of Application Software in New Production Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 18-24, June.
    10. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carnero Moya, M. Carmen, 2004. "The control of the setting up of a predictive maintenance programme using a system of indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 57-75, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hipkin, I. B. & De Cock, C., 2000. "TQM and BPR: lessons for maintenance management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 277-292, June.
    2. Vanneste, S. G. & Van Wassenhove, L. N., 1995. "An integrated and structured approach to improve maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 241-257, April.
    3. Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Gupta, Jatinder N.D., 2006. "Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 313-326, June.
    4. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    5. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    6. Bruns, Peter, 2002. "Optimal maintenance strategies for systems with partial repair options and without assuming bounded costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 146-165, May.
    7. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    8. Vineyard, Michael & Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi & Meredith, Jack R., 1999. "Failure rate distributions for flexible manufacturing systems: An empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 139-155, July.
    9. Formaneck, Steven D. & Cozzarin, Brian P., 2013. "Technology adoption and training practices as a constrained shortest path problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 459-472.
    10. de Brito, Marisa P. & Dekker, Rommert, 2003. "Modelling product returns in inventory control--exploring the validity of general assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 225-241, January.
    11. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    12. Zhu, Mixin & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2023. "Hybrid opportunistic maintenance policy for serial-parallel multi-station manufacturing systems with spare part overlap," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Thomas Bittar & Pierre Carpentier & Jean-Philippe Chancelier & Jérôme Lonchampt, 2022. "A decomposition method by interaction prediction for the optimization of maintenance scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 229-267, September.
    14. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    15. Salari, Nooshin & Makis, Viliam, 2017. "Comparison of two maintenance policies for a multi-unit system considering production and demand rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 381-391.
    16. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    18. Hoskins, R. P. & Brint, A. T. & Strbac, G., 1999. "A structured approach to Asset Management within the electricity industry," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 221-232, February.
    19. Haque, Lani & Armstrong, Michael J., 2007. "A survey of the machine interference problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 469-482, June.
    20. Min-Tsai Lai, 2007. "Periodical Replacement Model for a Multi-Unit System Subject to Failure Rate Interaction," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 401-411, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:1:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.