IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The art of justifying new technology to top management

Listed author(s):
  • Currie, WL
Registered author(s):

    Empirical research on the selection and implementation of new technology suggests that the use of traditional cost accounting methods to justify technology are outdated. This is evident in the situation where top managers require detailed cost-benefit information to demonstrate the short-term returns from new technology. The root of the problem lies in the formal budgetary control system whereby top managers require 'proof' based on simple cost-accounting methods that expenditure on new technology is worthwhile. This leads many engineering managers to admit to providing 'spurious' accounting information to support their proposal documents for new technology which suggests that decision-making on technology is a fragmented process where responsibilities rest with different levels of management. It appears that communication difficulties arise because those with the necessary technical expertise are not given access to company resources without satisfying the stringent controls imposed by accountants. This was highlighted by many engineers who claimed that whilst their technical expertise was 'crucial' in the introduction of new technology, this alone was insufficient to allow them entry into managerial hierarchies. It is suggested that companies where senior engineering managers were given greater powers in the disposal of company resources for new technology experienced fewer post-implementation problems unlike those companies where progress in technological change was inhibited by the short-term and traditional budgetary control system.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(89)90038-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Omega.

    Volume (Year): 17 (1989)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 409-418

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:409-418
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description

    Order Information: Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
    Web: https://shop.elsevier.com/order?id=375&ref=375_01_ooc_1&version=01

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:409-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.