IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The art of justifying new technology to top management


  • Currie, WL


Empirical research on the selection and implementation of new technology suggests that the use of traditional cost accounting methods to justify technology are outdated. This is evident in the situation where top managers require detailed cost-benefit information to demonstrate the short-term returns from new technology. The root of the problem lies in the formal budgetary control system whereby top managers require 'proof' based on simple cost-accounting methods that expenditure on new technology is worthwhile. This leads many engineering managers to admit to providing 'spurious' accounting information to support their proposal documents for new technology which suggests that decision-making on technology is a fragmented process where responsibilities rest with different levels of management. It appears that communication difficulties arise because those with the necessary technical expertise are not given access to company resources without satisfying the stringent controls imposed by accountants. This was highlighted by many engineers who claimed that whilst their technical expertise was 'crucial' in the introduction of new technology, this alone was insufficient to allow them entry into managerial hierarchies. It is suggested that companies where senior engineering managers were given greater powers in the disposal of company resources for new technology experienced fewer post-implementation problems unlike those companies where progress in technological change was inhibited by the short-term and traditional budgetary control system.

Suggested Citation

  • Currie, WL, 1989. "The art of justifying new technology to top management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 409-418.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:409-418

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Hipkin, I. B. & Lockett, A. G., 1995. "A study of maintenance technology implementation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 79-88, February.
    2. Jones, TC & Lee, B, 1998. "Accounting, strategy and AMT investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 769-783, December.
    3. Kearns, Grover S., 2006. "The effect of top management support of SISP on strategic IS management: insights from the US electric power industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 236-253, June.
    4. Torkkeli, Marko & Tuominen, Markku, 2002. "The contribution of technology selection to core competencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 271-284, June.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:409-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.