IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jocaae/v21y2025i3s1815566925000529.html

The spillover effects of auditor sanctions on clients: evidence from stock exchange comment letters in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Xiao
  • Lau, Yeng Wai
  • bin Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi

Abstract

This study investigates the spillover effects of auditor sanctions on client firms. Using the DID model, results of listed Chinese A-share firms for the 2015–2022 period provide evidence of an adverse spillover effects of auditor sanctions where client firms have a higher probability of receiving exchange comment letters that are more severe, indicating that corporate regulators value the reputational damage of auditor sanctions. The spillover effects are more pronounced when auditor sanctions are more severe, news reports of sanction events are higher, or the audit firm is smaller. Additional analyses suggest that such adverse spillover effects are reflected in increased clients’ negative media attention and lower assessment of the quality of client firms’ accounting information. However, client firms’ online information disclosures on regulated, exchange interactive platforms can mitigate such adverse spillover effects. This study expands the boundaries of extant literature on the consequences of auditor sanctions in an emerging market and sheds light on how client firms can cope with the resultant reputation loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Xiao & Lau, Yeng Wai & bin Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi, 2025. "The spillover effects of auditor sanctions on clients: evidence from stock exchange comment letters in China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:21:y:2025:i:3:s1815566925000529
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566925000529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Weber & Michael Willenborg & Jieying Zhang, 2008. "Does Auditor Reputation Matter? The Case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 941-972, September.
    2. Lisic, Ling Lei & Silveri, Sabatino (Dino) & Song, Yanheng & Wang, Kun, 2015. "Accounting fraud, auditing, and the role of government sanctions in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1186-1195.
    3. Lennox, Clive & Pittman, Jeffrey, 2010. "Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 84-103, February.
    4. Srinivasan Krishnamurthy & Jian Zhou & Nan Zhou, 2006. "Auditor Reputation, Auditor Independence, and the Stock†Market Impact of Andersen's Indictment on Its Client Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 465-490, June.
    5. Hongqi Yuan & Chujun Zhang & Desong Kong & Haina Shi, 2019. "The consequence of audit failure on audit firms: evidence from IPO approval in China," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 245-269, April.
    6. Michael Firth, 1990. "Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(3), pages 374-387, Autumn.
    7. Chen, Gongmeng & Firth, Michael & Gao, Daniel N. & Rui, Oliver M., 2005. "Is China's securities regulatory agency a toothless tiger? Evidence from enforcement actions," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 451-488.
    8. Kedia, Simi & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2011. "Do the SEC's enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 259-278, April.
    9. Gregory S. Miller & Douglas J. Skinner, 2015. "The Evolving Disclosure Landscape: How Changes in Technology, the Media, and Capital Markets Are Affecting Disclosure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(2), pages 221-239, May.
    10. Stefan Sundgren & Tobias Svanström, 2017. "Is the Public Oversight of Auditors Effective? The Impact of Sanctions on Loss of Clients, Salary and Audit Reporting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 787-818, October.
    11. Cade, Nicole L., 2018. "Corporate social media: How two-way disclosure channels influence investors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 63-79.
    12. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2023. "A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2555-2591.
    13. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    14. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Balakrishnan, Karthik & Cohen, Daniel, 2012. "Corporate governance and the information environment: Evidence from state antitakeover laws," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 185-204.
    15. Barbara Biasi & Heather Sarsons, 2022. "Flexible Wages, Bargaining, and the Gender Gap," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(1), pages 215-266.
    16. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    17. Zhanchi Wu & Yu Yuan, 2022. "Exchange Inquiry Letters and Stock Price Informativeness: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(13), pages 3813-3823, October.
    18. Yinju Nie & Ming Jia, 2021. "The power of crowds: can minority shareholder activism promote management earnings forecast accuracy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6333-6385, December.
    19. Qifa Xu & Qianqian Li & Cuixia Jiang & Jun Wu & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Social media, interaction information and stock market efficiency: evidence from the Shenzhen stock exchange easy interaction platform in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 1469-1496, November.
    20. Yao, Youfu & Hong, Yun, 2023. "Can comment letters impact excess cash holdings? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 900-922.
    21. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    22. W. Kip Viscusi & Joseph E. Harrington & John M. Vernon, 2005. "Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 4th Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 4, volume 1, number 026222075x, December.
    23. K. Hung Chan & Donghui Wu, 2011. "Aggregate Quasi Rents and Auditor Independence: Evidence from Audit Firm Mergers in China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 175-213, March.
    24. Gilles Hilary & Clive Lennox, 2005. "The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review," Post-Print hal-00482306, HAL.
    25. Haidong Li & Ziming Qian & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Qian Wang, 2023. "Do green concerns promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from Chinese stock exchange interactive platforms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1786-1801, April.
    26. Stephen V. Brown & Xiaoli (Shaolee) Tian & Jennifer Wu Tucker, 2018. "The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 622-656, June.
    27. Kam-Wah Lai & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2021. "Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1190, April.
    28. Lennox, Clive & Li, Bing, 2014. "Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 58-75.
    29. Lamoreaux, Phillip T., 2016. "Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 313-337.
    30. Brian J. Bushee & John E. Core & Wayne Guay & Sophia J.W. Hamm, 2010. "The Role of the Business Press as an Information Intermediary," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, March.
    31. Hilary, Gilles & Lennox, Clive, 2005. "The credibility of self-regulation: Evidence from the accounting profession's peer review program," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 211-229, December.
    32. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 420-445.
    33. Paul K. Chaney & Kirk L. Philipich, 2002. "Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1221-1245, September.
    34. Jingru Hou & Xin Shi & Ran Tao, 2023. "Exchange Comment Letters and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 1140-1160, March.
    35. Rick Johnston & Reining Petacchi, 2017. "Regulatory Oversight of Financial Reporting: Securities and Exchange Commission Comment Letters," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 1128-1155, June.
    36. Thorsten Beck & Ross Levine & Alexey Levkov, 2010. "Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1637-1667, October.
    37. Lu, Jing & Qiu, Yuhang, 2023. "Does non-punitive regulation diminish stock price crash risk?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    38. Jerry Sun & Steven F. Cahan & Jing Xu, 2016. "Individual Auditor Conservatism After CSRC Sanctions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 133-146, June.
    39. Miles B. Gietzmann & Angela K. Pettinicchio, 2014. "External Auditor Reassessment of Client Business Risk Following the Issuance of a Comment Letter by the SEC," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-85, May.
    40. Meyer, Bruce D, 1995. "Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 151-161, April.
    41. Liuchuang Li & Baolei Qi & Ashok Robin & Rong Yang, 2022. "The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 38-66, January.
    42. Paul Hribar & Todd Kravet & Ryan Wilson, 2014. "A new measure of accounting quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 506-538, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aobdia, Daniel & Shroff, Nemit, 2017. "Regulatory oversight and auditor market share," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 262-287.
    2. Aobdia, Daniel & Liu, Xuejiao & Na, Ke & Wu, Hong, 2025. "Client restatement announcement, audit office human capital investment, and audit quality improvements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2).
    3. Chang, Wen-Ching & Chen, Jui-Pin, 2020. "Auditor sanction and reputation damage: Evidence from changes in non-client-company directorships," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    4. Li, Xuelian & Dong, Liang & Kot, Hung Wan & Liu, Ming, 2024. "Regulatory investigations, media coverage, and audit opinions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    6. Matthew Ege & Dechun Wang & Nina Xu, 2025. "The consequences of reputation-damaging events for Big Four auditors: evidence from 110 cases with media coverage between 2007 and 2019," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 2015-2070, June.
    7. Li, Wanfu & Pittman, Jeffrey & Wang, Zi-Tian & Zhao, Ziye, 2025. "The importance of information flow within auditors’ client portfolios to audit quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Kam-Wah Lai & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2021. "Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1190, April.
    9. Ma, Rui & Guo, Fei & Li, Dongdong, 2024. "Can public data availability affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Xiong, Jiacai & Yang, Zelin & Wang, Qing Sophie, 2025. "Can non-punitive regulation curb corporate greenwashing?Evidence from a word embedding model," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Stefano Azzali & Tatiana Mazza & Fernanda Alberto, 2021. "Effects of disclosed audit sanctions on audit firm’s market share in Italy and Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2477-2505, April.
    12. Gu, Qiankun & Li, Conggang & Li, Yanyin & Xu, Rong & Xu, Yize, 2025. "Does non-punitive regulation increase the demand for D&O insurance?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Hu, Wen-Quan & Su, Yunqing & Fang, Hongsheng, 2025. "Constraints and incentives: Promoting air pollution governance through performance evaluation system," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Wainberg, James S. & Kida, Thomas & David Piercey, M. & Smith, James F., 2013. "The impact of anecdotal data in regulatory audit firm inspection reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 621-636.
    15. DeFond, Mark L. & Lennox, Clive S., 2011. "The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 21-40, June.
    16. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2024. "Estimating Causal Effects with Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," IFRO Working Paper 2024/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    17. Lennox, Clive & Pittman, Jeffrey, 2010. "Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 84-103, February.
    18. Ray Ball, 2009. "Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(2), pages 277-323, May.
    19. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Stefan Sundgren & Tobias Svanström, 2013. "Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing: evidence from small- and medium-sized enterprises," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 31-55, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:21:y:2025:i:3:s1815566925000529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-contemporary-accounting-and-economics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.