IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v89y2025ics0927538x24003494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does non-punitive regulation increase the demand for D&O insurance?

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Qiankun
  • Li, Conggang
  • Li, Yanyin
  • Xu, Rong
  • Xu, Yize

Abstract

As a pivotal element in the evolution of government regulation, the economic consequences of inquiry letters have received significant attention from policymakers and academics. This study examines the impact of inquiry letters issued by stock exchanges on the demand for corporate directors' and officers' liability insurance (D&O insurance). Our findings indicate a significant positive relationship between inquiry letters and future D&O insurance demand, with main conclusions remaining robust across various robustness tests such as difference-in-differences estimation, propensity score matching, and instrumental variables. In addition, both regulatory inquiry pressure and corporate attention significantly increase D&O insurance demand, with notable variations across inquiry types. Channel tests show that inquiry letters function as effective risk warning signals, alerting companies to litigation, governance, and reputation risks. Further analysis reveals that corporate governance mechanisms and political connections dampen the facilitating effect of inquiry letters on firms' D&O insurance demand. Our study provides valuable practical insights for policymakers and corporate managers in emerging markets based on a non-punitive regulation perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Qiankun & Li, Conggang & Li, Yanyin & Xu, Rong & Xu, Yize, 2025. "Does non-punitive regulation increase the demand for D&O insurance?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:89:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x24003494
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24003494
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regulatory inquiry letters; Demand for D&O insurance; Non-punitive regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:89:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x24003494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.