IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v38yi4p580-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences

Author

Listed:
  • Payne, Brian K.
  • Tewksbury, Richard
  • Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt

Abstract

In this study, attention was given to how demographic, victimization, and community-level factors contribute to the belief that sex offenders can be rehabilitated. A survey was conducted with 746 residents of Norfolk and Virginia Beach, Virginia. A vast majority of the sample thought it was impossible to rehabilitate sex offenders, and a sizeable proportion of respondents indicated that they did not know whether sex offenders could be rehabilitated. Results showed that very few factors predicted attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders. The implications call for expanded efforts to educate the public about sex offenders, as well as strategies for strengthening support for rehabilitation. In particular, it is argued that more attention should be given to identifying the punitive aspects of rehabilitation and increasing awareness about treatment strategies among policymakers. The authors also call for reconceptualizing rehabilitation so the concept is driven by practical matters rather than politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Payne, Brian K. & Tewksbury, Richard & Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt, 2010. "Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 580-588, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:4:p:580-588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(10)00084-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cochran, John K. & Chamlin, Mitchell B., 2006. "The enduring racial divide in death penalty support," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 85-99.
    2. Sun, Ivan Y. & Payne, Brian K. & Wu, Yuning, 2008. "The impact of situational factors, officer characteristics, and neighborhood context on police behavior: A multilevel analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 22-32, March.
    3. Applegate, Brandon K. & Cullen, Francis T. & Fisher, Bonnie S., 2002. "Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 89-100.
    4. Cochran, John K. & Chamlin, Mitchell B., 2005. "Can information change public opinion? Another test of the Marshall hypotheses," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 573-584.
    5. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    6. Sprott, Jane B., 1999. "Are members of the public tough on crime?: The dimensions of public "punitiveness"," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 467-474, September.
    7. Priest, Thomas B. & Carter, Deborah Brown, 1999. "Evaluations of police performance in an african american sample," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 457-465, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mancini, Christina & Shields, Ryan T., 2014. "Notes on a (sex crime) scandal: The impact of media coverage of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church on public opinion," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 221-232.
    2. Koon-Magnin, Sarah, 2015. "Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 80-88.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buckler, Kevin & Cullen, Francis T. & Unnever, James D., 2007. "Citizen assessment of local criminal courts: Does fairness matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-536.
    2. Cochran, John K. & Sanders, Beth A., 2009. "The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 525-533, November.
    3. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    4. Mancini, Christina & Mears, Daniel P., 2010. "To execute or not to execute? Examining public support for capital punishment of sex offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 959-968, September.
    5. de Vries, Ieke & Farrell, Amy & Bouché, Vanessa & Wittmer-Wolfe, Dana E., 2020. "Crime frames and gender differences in the activation of crime concern and crime responses," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Douhou, Salima & Magnus, Jan R. & van Soest, Arthur, 2011. "The perception of small crime," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 749-763.
    7. Flory, Christopher M. & May, David C. & Minor, Kevin I. & Wood, Peter B., 2006. "A comparison of punishment exchange rates between offenders under supervision and their supervising officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 39-50.
    8. Erica B. Russell & James C. Garand, 2023. "Race, linked fate, and attitudes toward the police," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(2), pages 110-124, March.
    9. Ajilore, Olugbenga, 2017. "Is There a 1033 Effect? Police Militarization and Aggressive Policing," MPRA Paper 82543, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rief, Rachael & Huff, Jessica, 2023. "Revisiting the influence of police response time: Examining the effects of response time on arrest and how it varies by call type," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Tyagi, Akansha & Dhar, Rajib Lochan & Sharma, Jyoti, 2016. "Police culture, tourists and destinations: A study of Uttarakhand, India," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 563-573.
    12. James E. Larsen & John P. Blair, 2009. "The Importance of Police Performance as a Determinant of Satisfaction with Police," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10, March.
    13. Martin, Allison & Wright, Emily M. & Steiner, Benjamin, 2016. "Formal controls, neighborhood disadvantage, and violent crime in U.S. cities: Examining (un)intended consequences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 58-65.
    14. Aizpurua, Eva & Applegate, Brandon K. & Bolin, Riane M. & Vuk, Mateja & Ouellette, Heather M., 2020. "The sins of the child: Public opinion about parental responsibility for juvenile crime," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Raj Sethuraju & Jason Sole & Brian E. Oliver, 2016. "Understanding Death Penalty Support and Opposition Among Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    16. Payne, Brian K. & Time, Victoria & Gainey, Randy R., 2006. "Police chiefs' and students' attitudes about the Miranda warnings," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 653-660.
    17. Applegate, Brandon K. & Cullen, Francis T. & Fisher, Bonnie S., 2002. "Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 89-100.
    18. Nouri, Seyvan, 2021. "Police use of force at street segments: Do street-level characteristics matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Martina Bavastrelli, 2015. "(English) Democracy and deliberation. Can discussion changes opinions? (Italiano) Democrazia e deliberazione. Discutere fa cambiare opinione?," IRPPS Working Papers 76:2015, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
    20. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Nathan, Vincent M., 2009. "Reasons for death penalty attitudes among Chinese citizens: Retributive or instrumental?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 225-233, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:4:p:580-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.