The importance of county context in the measurement of sentence disparity: The search for routinization
No abstract is available for this item.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Heckman, James, 2013.
"Sample selection bias as a specification error,"
Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
- Gertz, Marc G. & Myers, Laura B., 1990. "Prosecutorial decisionmaking in the Netherlands: A research note," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 359-368.
- Gertz, Marc G. & Price, Albert C., 1985. "Variables influencing sentencing severity: Intercourt differences in Connecticut," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 131-139.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:23:y:1995:i:3:p:223-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.