IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v102y2026ics0047235225002429.html

Assessing judicial responses of judges to stalking in South Korea: A focal concerns perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Noh, Hyeseon
  • Lee, Soojung
  • Burrow, John

Abstract

Stalking did not attract much attention in South Korea until two homicides motivated by stalking occurred in 2016 and 2021. These two events spurred calls for anti-stalking legislation that would better protect victims. With the passage of the Act on the Punishment of Crime of Stalking in 2021 (the Act), South Korea took an important step forward. However, we have no knowledge of its effectiveness. This study attempts to fill gaps in our knowledge about stalking by focusing on defendants who have been adjudicated and found guilty in the District Court of South Korea. Through the focal concerns theoretical lens, we examine 465 stalking cases adjudicated by the District Court of South Korea to better understand the sentencing outcomes of stalking defendants. The findings suggest District Court judges are equally likely to use incarceration for both idiosyncratic and spatial stalking cases. Several important legal and theoretical considerations will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Noh, Hyeseon & Lee, Soojung & Burrow, John, 2026. "Assessing judicial responses of judges to stalking in South Korea: A focal concerns perspective," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s0047235225002429
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225002429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynda Cheshire & Shannon Buglar, 2016. "Anti-social or intensively sociable? The local context of neighbour disputes and complaints among social housing tenants," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 729-748, September.
    2. Sharma, Madhuri & Stolzenberg, Lisa & D'Alessio, Stewart J., 2022. "Evaluating the cumulative impact of indigent defense attorneys on criminal justice outcomes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Riccardo Ferraresso & Chunrye Kim, 2024. "Cyber Dating Abuse Among Korean College Students: An Exploratory Study of Risk and Protective Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    4. Brady, Patrick Q. & Reyns, Bradford W. & Landhuis, Jennifer & Griffin, Vanessa Woodward, 2023. "APPlied stalking: What the next generation of stalking victims consider to be ‘stalking’ and why victims report their experiences to the police," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Carlos Cinelli & Chad Hazlett, 2020. "Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(1), pages 39-67, February.
    6. Stephen Demuth & Darrell Steffensmeier, 2004. "Ethnicity Effects on Sentence Outcomes in Large Urban Courts: Comparisons Among White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(4), pages 994-1011, December.
    7. Petersen, Kevin, 2025. "Is it all relative? Proposing the use of marginal effects for meta-analysis of binary outcomes in criminology and criminal justice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Hunnicutt & Kou Gbaintor-Johnson, 2024. "The Missing Link: Informal Political Elites and Protest in Areas of Limited Statehood," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(10), pages 1941-1967, November.
    2. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    3. Christoph Dworschak, 2024. "Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 462-476, May.
    4. Johnen, Constantin & Parlasca, Martin & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2023. "Mobile money adoption in Kenya: The role of mobile money agents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Heng Chen & Daniel F. Heitjan, 2022. "Analysis of local sensitivity to nonignorability with missing outcomes and predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1342-1352, December.
    6. Indra de Soysa, 2022. "Economic freedom vs. egalitarianism: An empirical test of weak & strong sustainability, 1970–2017," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 236-268, May.
    7. Garz, Marcel & Maaß, Sabrina, 2021. "Cartels in the European Union, antitrust action, and public attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 533-547.
    8. Linda Argote & Jerry Guo & Ki-Won Haan & Matthew R. Rosengart & Cindy Y. Teng & Jeremy M. Kahn, 2026. "Transactive Memory Systems and Hospital Trauma Team Performance: Shared Experience in Action Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 48-70, January.
    9. Gebka, Bartosz & Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Wildman, John, 2024. "The transition from COVID-19 infections to deaths: Do governance quality and corruption affect it?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 235-253.
    10. Belén González & Richard Traunmüller, 2024. "The political consequences of wartime sexual violence: Evidence from a list experiment," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(6), pages 1035-1050, November.
    11. Chung, Seung-hun, 2024. "Impact of fundamentalism on human capital, women's social status and demographics: Evidence from Islamic state of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Iraq," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Colnet Bénédicte & Josse Julie & Varoquaux Gaël & Scornet Erwan, 2022. "Causal effect on a target population: A sensitivity analysis to handle missing covariates," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 372-414, January.
    13. Marbach, Moritz, 2025. "Compositional Effects, Internal Migration and Electoral Outcomes," SocArXiv pq3bd_v1, Center for Open Science.
    14. Dimiter Toshkov, 2024. "The political effects of intra-EU migration: Evidence from national and European elections in seven countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(4), pages 723-747, December.
    15. Jean Philippe Décieux & Alexandra Mergener, 2021. "German Labor Emigration in Times of Technological Change: Occupational Characteristics and Geographical Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Hao, Shiming, 2021. "True structure change, spurious treatment effect? A novel approach to disentangle treatment effects from structure changes," MPRA Paper 108679, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Tang, Lianzhou & Xu, Wenli, 2025. "Patronage and pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Luo, Erga & Yan, Ru & He, Yaping & Han, Zhen & Feng, Yiyu & Qian, Wenrong & Li, Jinkai, 2024. "Does biogas industrial policy promote the industrial transformation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Maria Tackett, 2022. "The Effect of Presidential Particularism on Economic Well-Being: A County-Level Analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 135-168, March.
    20. Wang-Ly, Nathan & Newell, Ben R., 2022. "Allowing early access to retirement savings: Lessons from Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 716-733.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s0047235225002429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.